Paully Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Colo could literally walk off the field 20 minutes into a game in order to catch a flight to Argentina and Paully would still come out with the old 'playing really well until' spiel. Embarrassing. So he wasn't playing well until the penalty incident? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Richard Keys just tweeted that we have won the appeal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 WUT? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Goes without saying. Shocking decision from the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Makes sense. Shame though. But appealing was always the right thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Richard Keys just tweeted that we have won the appeal. I still don't think it was even a foul never mind a red card - if that was given against me in the middle of the park then I'd go nuts with the ref never mind in the box - absolutely s*** decision Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Surprised we won the appeal but it's a tiny moral victory. Whatever shows Madley up for what he really is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Richard Keys just tweeted that we have won the appeal. I still don't think it was even foul never mind a red card - if that was given against me then I'd go nuts with the ref - absolutely s*** decision Yep totally agree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Goes without saying. Shocking decision from the ref. Makes sense. Shame though. But appealing was always the right thing to do. I thought we had no chance. If there's any debate they usually back the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Goes without saying. Shocking decision from the ref. Makes sense. Shame though. But appealing was always the right thing to do. I thought we had no chance. If there's any debate they usually back the ref. Pretty much no one in football thought it was a red apart from Madley and Andy Gray. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Very surprised tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Goes without saying. Shocking decision from the ref. Makes sense. Shame though. But appealing was always the right thing to do. I thought we had no chance. If there's any debate they usually back the ref. Pretty much no one in football thought it was a red apart from Madley and Andy Gray. Apart from everyone on Sky Sports' coverage which is why I expected us to have no chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Thanks ref for a pointless red which massively influenced the result. Fucking prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Very surprised tbh. Not sure why people are surprised. It was fairly obvious especially after actually reading the rules TCD posted on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Maybe it's time to have a fucking sideline review of straight red cards or something to make sure these aren't massively destroying matches. Refs need to be held accountable for gaffs like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Very surprised tbh. Not sure why people are surprised. It was fairly obvious especially after actually reading the rules TCD posted on here. As I mentioned previously, the FA usually go with the ref unless public opinion - as decided by whatever moron happens to be in the SkySports/MoTD studio (think Souness/Robbie Savage etc) - vehemently disagrees. Actually re-examining an incident on its merits is the surprise for me! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Very surprised tbh. Not sure why people are surprised. It was fairly obvious especially after actually reading the rules TCD posted on here. As I mentioned previously, the FA usually go with the ref unless public opinion - as decided by whatever moron happens to be in the SkySports/MoTD studio (think Souness/Robbie Savage etc) - vehemently disagrees. Actually re-examining an incident on its merits is the surprise for me! Usually there's a lot of subjectivity that goes with the decisions, and they're usually revolving around serious foul play or intent to injure, spit or no spit, etc.. This was more cut and dry and all they had to do was take out the rule book and see a couple of replays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This would be very surprising. Basically they would be overruling a subjective decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This would be very surprising. Basically they would be overruling a subjective decision. IMO it would also be saying that it wasn't even a foul to begin with. Seen it a hundred times today and it is so clear that Fletcher runs into Coloccini first before Colo shifts any weight towards the mackem fanny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This would be very surprising. Basically they would be overruling a subjective decision. IMO it would also be saying that it wasn't even a foul to begin with. Seen it a hundred times today and it is so clear that Fletcher runs into Coloccini first before Colo shifts any weight towards the mackem fanny. You need to get out more, mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Also, we all know that this now means Colo's gan get himself sent off against Stoke. Wouldn't be NUFC if that didn't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Will they publish a proper judgement? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This would be very surprising. Basically they would be overruling a subjective decision. IMO it would also be saying that it wasn't even a foul to begin with. Seen it a hundred times today and it is so clear that Fletcher runs into Coloccini first before Colo shifts any weight towards the mackem fanny. You need to get out more, mate. Seen it 6 times today and it is so clear that Fletcher runs into Coloccini first before Colo shifts any weight towards the mackem fanny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Fletcher was looking for a penalty kick and went down with ease. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 http://www.thefa.com/news/governance/equality/2015/oct/fabricio-coloccini-suspension-lifted? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now