Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I see there are videos of him and Woodman doing some goalkeeping training shit on youtube. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Happening again. More people complaining about people complaining, than there really is people complaining. I'll bite then... How much are we wasting on this ginger c***? words f***ing fail me I just said a few hours ago that if we spend ANYTHING on a new GK then it would be the most pointless signing ever, and here you go. W. T. F. ?!?!?!?! Is he actually going to play LB? We have three good goalkeepers. Whyyyyyyyy?!?! All well and good until Krul gets injured and then we've got a f***ing League One player in goal. And he's a ginger. Wonderful. Are we seriously going to hand one of our 25 squad places to a league 1 goalkeeper? Maybe because atm it's not the most important department we need. And if free's/wages were included in the £35mil, we've spent more of it. Just seems it's a pointless signing (or a 'job for the boys' considering he's our current GK coachs' mate) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 i would be a little bit concerned if he's back up to krul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 No, the LB bit was edited in today, go look at the revision history. Give him a go anyway. Then Harper up front and we're sorted. Better than doing something stupid like playing Perch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 i would be a little bit concerned if he's back up to krul If Harper leaves and this is all we get as cover, I agree. As it stands though Krul, Harper & Elliot is fine by me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
localshop Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Get in! Break out the WOW signing smilie! http://www.rayesdesign.com/smilies/dancing/d033.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 journal saying they hope to have him on the bench on saturday :s whats up with harper? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 journal saying they hope to have him on the bench on saturday :s whats up with harper? Visa problems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hobshobs Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 journal saying they hope to have him on the bench on saturday :s whats up with harper? He's shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 journal saying they hope to have him on the bench on saturday :s whats up with harper? He wasn't very nice to Derek after the sacking of Hughton apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolution Number 9 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I just don't understand this at all. I can't wrap my head around it. We need a left back and a striker before the derby... I know, lets sign a goalie. I'm not even pissed off any more, I'm just laughing at it all now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 journal saying they hope to have him on the bench on saturday :s whats up with harper? What Caulkin refers to as "the marginalising of senior players". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hobshobs Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 It's one thing opening your mouth when your doing it on the park week in week out. Nolan wasn't, Harper wasn't, Smith wasn't. Not quite the big boys they thought they were. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolution Number 9 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Think its a tad unfair to treat Harper like that after the years of service he's given, if you don't want him to play a role this season then sell him and let him go somewhere where he can. (and free up those valuable wages ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Happening again. More people complaining about people complaining, than there really is people complaining. And? It just shows that there are more level headed folk than idiots? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Didn't click this thread at first because I thought it was about our former defender. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hobshobs Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Think its a tad unfair to treat Harper like that after the years of service he's given, if you don't want him to play a role this season then sell him and let him go somewhere where he can. (and free up those valuable wages ) I guarantee you Harper won't go unless it's somewhere reasonably local. Been in the comfort zone for years. Similar to Shola really. In all honesty who would buy Harper for a half decent amount. Loan possibly but that's about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I just don't understand this at all. I can't wrap my head around it. We need a left back and a striker before the derby... I know, lets sign a goalie. I'm not even pissed off any more, I'm just laughing at it all now. It's not like signing Elliot will suddenly wipe out our interest in other players you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Harper got paid a mint for being second choice keeper under Robson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Think its a tad unfair to treat Harper like that after the years of service he's given, if you don't want him to play a role this season then sell him and let him go somewhere where he can. (and free up those valuable wages ) I guarantee you Harper won't go unless it's somewhere reasonably local. Been in the comfort zone for years. Similar to Shola really. In all honesty who would buy Harper for a half decent amount. Loan possibly but that's about it. I think he'll get a few offers actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I can't see Harper getting a first team spot at any Premier League club tbh. Norwich at a push. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolution Number 9 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I just don't understand this at all. I can't wrap my head around it. We need a left back and a striker before the derby... I know, lets sign a goalie. I'm not even p*ssed off any more, I'm just laughing at it all now. It's not like signing Elliot will suddenly wipe out our interest in other players you know. But it is like signing Elliot could waste valuable time, the one thing we certainly don't have in abundance before the next game, which I don't know if you've noticed is a rather important one. Surely this could have waited till after the derby, with all our efforts focused on bringing in the all-important left back and striker that we absolutely need before the match? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 He was great in the Championship and for the early part of last season but was showing significant signs of decline when he got injured. Haven't seen him recently enough to determine where he's at right now. Given how things are going, I assume the club don't like what they see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 I just don't understand this at all. I can't wrap my head around it. We need a left back and a striker before the derby... I know, lets sign a goalie. I'm not even p*ssed off any more, I'm just laughing at it all now. It's not like signing Elliot will suddenly wipe out our interest in other players you know. But it is like signing Elliot could waste valuable time, the one thing we certainly don't have in abundance before the next game, which I don't know if you've noticed is a rather important one. Surely this could have waited till after the derby, with all our efforts focused on bringing in the all-important left back and striker that we absolutely need before the match? Not sure it wastes any time. It's not impossible to negotiate on multiple deals at one time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Happening again. More people complaining about people complaining, than there really is people complaining. it's bad enough we have people complaining about others complaining. But when we have people complaining about people who complain about others complaining, then what's so much to fuss about complaining in the first place? The blame lies on the the 2nd person who complained.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now