Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He's a t*** but it's somewhat irrelevant. The only way that's getting extended is if we get taken over by someone who cares and if that happens they can buy the land back.

 

Am I right in thinking the proposed expansion only adds 8k as well? With the TV money nowadays, that's next to nothing in terms of new revenue.

 

What? And break whatever new building was constructed there down?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a t*** but it's somewhat irrelevant. The only way that's getting extended is if we get taken over by someone who cares and if that happens they can buy the land back.

 

Am I right in thinking the proposed expansion only adds 8k as well? With the TV money nowadays, that's next to nothing in terms of new revenue.

 

What? And break whatever new building was constructed there down?

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Aye, but it's not just about the 8000 extra seats. There were plans for a hotel, casino and conference centre (which would be owned by the club) Extra revenue down the pan.

 

:lol: What has Mike Ashley done so far to make you think that money will go back into the club?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

He's a twat but it's somewhat irrelevant. The only way that's getting extended is if we get taken over by someone who cares and if that happens they can buy the land back.

 

Am I right in thinking the proposed expansion only adds 8k as well? With the TV money nowadays, that's next to nothing in terms of new revenue.

 

The Chronicle says £300m to do it(plus the hotel or whatever would have been) which was never going to make money in our lifetime tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

At one time, the club supposedly owned a lot of property and land so it seems as if there will be little left other than the stadium (which seems to be used much less these days than previously outside of match days) and the training ground.  Will there be anything else left to sell off?  Maybe this is how they are going to pay for the training ground re-development?

 

I think we are fortunate that the land the stadium is on is owned by the council.  I always wondered if prospective owners might see the location of the ground and think about how much they could sell the land for (wasn't that one of the reasons people were buying Portsmouth?). 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Do you agree with it being sold?  I'm more than a bit peeved, once it's gone it's gone.

 

I forgot we owned it tbh. I never expected us to build on it if i am honest, if we were realistically going to use it then yes i would be bothered but lets not pretend the money would benefit NUFC in any way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

At one time, the club supposedly owned a lot of property and land so it seems as if there will be little left other than the stadium (which seems to be used much less these days than previously outside of match days) and the training ground.  Will there be anything else left to sell off?  Maybe this is how they are going to pay for the training ground re-development?

 

I think we are fortunate that the land the stadium is on is owned by the council.  I always wondered if prospective owners might see the location of the ground and think about how much they could sell the land for (wasn't that one of the reasons people were buying Portsmouth?). 

 

 

Unless its build on a diamond mine i somehow doubt the money raised selling the land would cover building an entire stadium(after buying the new land to go with it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what I think about this TBH. In theory it's a shame we're losing this land, but in practice I'm not sure it matters that much.

 

We're unlikely to need any extra capacity in the forseeable future. Even if we could fill it, the benefit to doing so would be marginal because of how unimportant ticket revenue has become compared to TV.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what I think about this TBH. In theory it's a shame we're losing this land, but in practice I'm not sure it matters that much.

 

We're unlikely to need any extra capacity in the forseeable future. Even if we could fill it, the benefit to doing so would be marginal because of how unimportant ticket revenue has become compared to TV.

 

You dont say  :yao:

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're unlikely to need any extra capacity in the forseeable future. Even if we could fill it, the benefit to doing so would be marginal because of how unimportant ticket revenue has become compared to TV.

 

Ah, we're always going to be mediocre so why have a scrap of land to capitalise on future success that will never arrive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbh the NUST spiel sums it up pretty well but the point is that one way of growing as a club is to add to your capacity, it's why Arsenal moved, why Spurs are desperate to move, etc.  It's also a way for more people to see the game, which would be excellent if we had a club worth getting excited over ever again.  This is yet more short-termism which will be done with the sole intention of saving cash and adding to Ashley's profit.  Again, once it's gone it's gone - another addition to this guy's horrible legacy.

 

Wonder how much the lease actually costs per year?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind of agree with the sentinment, but is it really as simple as that for us?

 

Arsenal went from 38k at Highbury to getting 60k people to pay £1000+ for their season tickets. We are basically already at Arsenal's level, except for the prices. It's not like we can only get 35k in SJP.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Tbh the NUST spiel sums it up pretty well but the point is that one way of growing as a club is to add to your capacity, it's why Arsenal moved, why Spurs are desperate to move, etc.  It's also a way for more people to see the game, which would be excellent if we had a club worth getting excited over ever again.  This is yet more short-termism which will be done with the sole intention of saving cash and adding to Ashley's profit.

 

Wonder how much the lease actually costs per year?

 

Its not saving cash though, we get £82k a year off the council for land we dont use so short term profit aye. As for the lease for the land i vaguely remember somethng like £1000 being mentioned before(for the term) but i may have invented that :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...