U2 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Like when you've just sold your flat and the day before you're handing over the keys you take a shit in the closet. People do that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Like when you've just sold your flat and the day before you're handing over the keys you take a s*** in the closet. People do that? Ashley probably would in some other way, just to fuck with us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I did just do a massive fart in a Sports Direct. Guess people could do worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Day Gadgie Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Only £30m more eexpensive than buying Neymar and Mbappe Well when you put it like that.. no, still a rip off. Half of Everton went for £200m last year; maybe the £400m in itself isn't that bad an asking price. But surely any potential buyer would run as soon as they see the loan he'd instantly want paid back on top of it. And I wouldn't be surprised if he tries to add bullshit sponsorship and merchandise clauses that benefit no one but Sports Direct as a parting shot. Insufferable c***. That's exactly what he'll try and do, which is why it's likely no one will end up buying us. Any potential buyer will probably have their own companies or links to companies that will they want to advertise so there's no way they'd have Shit Direct clogging up all the prime advertising space. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Looking at the potential of the club and with a world class manager here already in Rafa, surely we'd be a good choice, no? Especially when you look at how much money is involved in the PL. We're a good choice but who makes money from owning a Premiership club? The income may have gone up but so have all the transfer fees. It costs a lot more to compete and stay in the Premiership than it did when Ashley bought the club. If any buyer purchases NUFC with the aim to make money we're in trouble. It needs to be a billionaire's prestige boosting ego purchase (like Chelsea) or a promotional purchase for a state run investment vehicle (like PSG and Man City). I thought Ashley was wanting £450m so £380m is an improvement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 More importantly , its an easy excuse for him to not spend in january as he's "trying to sell" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 If there was any truth to the takeover story in the summer, NDA's would have been signed at the very beginning. These things take months to work out. It was never going to be the case that someone would come in and buy the club over space of a few days/weeks like the way Ashley did, that was something out of Wolf of Wall St looking back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 He'll hoy a big 'CLOSING DOWN SALE, EVERYTHING MUST GO' banner on it and leave it there for four years. £20m isn't much really but at least it's a sign he might be getting serious about pissing off. I wonder if this is due to some feedback on the price from some interest in the summer. If someone's come in with an interest and told him he's a greedy fat cunt and they're not paying £400m it might have given him pause for thought. More likely he's been stung by the criticism he's not seriously wanting to sell otherwise he'd drop the price. That criticism still holds though as he needs to offer it at a price which will make it an attractive buy and a 5% discount is probably deliberately small so he can keep the club while looking like he's trying to sell it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 People might be interested given the new negotiations possibly involving Facebook and Amazon. Sky and BT have deep pockets but both of those companies could buy them lock, stock and barrel without blinking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I wonder where this has come from he must be up to something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hog Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I'm afraid I'm at the stage now where I just take any takeover talk with a pinch of salt. It's wishful thinking but until it's actually happening it just looks like excuses to me for the Fat Turd not to let Rafa spend on new players in each transfer window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 380m for a Premier League club with a big(ish)stadium, a world class manager, no debt, and a large, loyal fan base is not a bad price. There is still growth coming in the TV rights, especially internationally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Can’t really say this time it’s a smokescreen to divert attention from some other crisis. The three straight wins have dulled any negativity from the transfer window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pons Alias Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 We’re in the top half with minimum spend. The iron is hot now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I wonder where this has come from he must be up to something Like someone else said it's just dripfeeding hope to people that he wants to sell when he obviously fucking doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 380m for a Premier League club with a big(ish)stadium, a world class manager, no debt, and a large, loyal fan base is not a bad price. There is still growth coming in the TV rights, especially internationally. Are NUFC as a company not in debt to Ashley? Thats the way I thought it was. I wonder if the price would include the debt too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I’m assuming that number includes the debt, or at least a significant portion of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Imagine if it doesn't include the debt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Or this could be the media trying to cause a bit of unsettling. Be great if there was a way to pinpoint where these stories started. "Newcastle in 4th and no scandals to write about... we can't be having that" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Or this could be the media trying to cause a bit of unsettling. Be great if there was a way to pinpoint where these stories started. "Newcastle in 4th and no scandals to write about... we can't be having that" What's unsettling about it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 In fact this morning around 7am this gets written.. no more than an opinion piece.. https://newcastletoons.com/2017/09/23/newcastle-united-mike-ashley-silent-benefits/ Then HITC start quoting an article by the times about 8.30 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/sport/ashley-cuts-newcastle-asking-price-to-380m-029rv7ch6 So who the fuck is Matt Hughes of The Times? Where's his HP? It's not unsettling news for us but the players can often be affected by stories like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Wrong thread but I wonder what the deal is with this reported Facebook and Amazon interest in the pl rights. Would they only broadcast online? I'd love to see it personally, Sky would shit the bed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Wrong thread but I wonder what the deal is with this reported Facebook and Amazon interest in the pl rights. Would they only broadcast online? I'd love to see it personally, Sky would s*** the bed. I can't see it personally, reckon they might be interested in the highlights part of what the PL selling but not full on coverage like BT/Sky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Wrong thread but I wonder what the deal is with this reported Facebook and Amazon interest in the pl rights. Would they only broadcast online? I'd love to see it personally, Sky would s*** the bed. I can't see it personally, reckon they might be interested in the highlights part of what the PL selling but not full on coverage like BT/Sky. Would be mint to see Sky fucked out of it like but yeah, stinks of them trying to drive the price up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Only £30m more eexpensive than buying Neymar and Mbappe Well when you put it like that.. no, still a rip off. Half of Everton went for £200m last year; maybe the £400m in itself isn't that bad an asking price. But surely any potential buyer would run as soon as they see the loan he'd instantly want paid back on top of it. And I wouldn't be surprised if he tries to add bullshit sponsorship and merchandise clauses that benefit no one but Sports Direct as a parting shot. Insufferable cunt. Everton had a £80m external debt so the £200m for half doesn't tell the full story. Nobody is going to buy NUFC and accept keeping on a £100m+ loan owed to Ashley so IF the £380m is true it would have to include Ashley's debt and mean they'd have the club debt free (we have no external debt to my knowledge (?)). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts