AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 in the meantime Colo/Mapou is still our best option (all things considered). Despite the fact that they're both small, weak and neither of them can mark. OK, Ian. Think you may be exaggerating slightly there Ronaldo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Maybe this is all just a dream. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Does somebody want to explain to me what Mike Williamson does better than Taylor, apart from keep his gob shut in the local press? I'll repeat a point I've made before. Despite his power and athleticism, Taylor does not seem to impose himself enough on the game. He tends to back off, staying goalside to avoid getting beaten, relying on blocking rather than intercepting or tackling. In terms of general ability, Williamson probably doesn't have anything over Taylor. (His distribution may be a bit better, but both are poor so I won't labour that point) In fact Taylor is stronger and quicker. But in terms of his style of defending, Williamson is much more pro-active. Crucially, he gets closer to his opponent. He's less worried about making mistakes and takes more initiative. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 There's no way Williamson's better on the ball than Taylor, like. Taylor's passing's actually come on a tonne. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmymag Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Does somebody want to explain to me what Mike Williamson does better than Taylor, apart from keep his gob shut in the local press? I'll repeat a point I've made before. Despite his power and athleticism, Taylor does not seem to impose himself enough on the game. He tends to back off, staying goalside to avoid getting beaten, relying on blocking rather than intercepting or tackling. In terms of general ability, Williamson probably doesn't have anything over Taylor. (His distribution may be a bit better, but both are poor so I won't labour that point) In fact Taylor is stronger and quicker. But in terms of his style of defending, Williamson is much more pro-active. Crucially, he gets closer to his opponent. He's less worried about making mistakes and takes more initiative. Williamson's distribution is better than Taylor's??? Fucking amazing! Williamson looked OK last night only because Everton were shit in the 2nd half. Williamson is not a Premiership player! So many short memories on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Yep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Williamson in general is a terrible player, Taylor is acceptable with comedy moments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Williamson lumps it when he's not even pressed and has passing options. He's the most blinkered player I've ever seen to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 There's no way Williamson's better on the ball than Taylor, like. Taylor's passing's actually come on a tonne. Well I'm not sure about that, but as I said, that's not a big issue for me. My main point is that Williamson actually defends in a different way. You haven't commented on that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Williamson defends like a Championship player with arthritis. Happy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Williamson defends like a Championship player with arthritis. Happy? I'm looking for some indication that you've actually understood my point about Taylor's style of defending, but disagree with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Taylor will make mistakes but he's physically decent and won't bend over for the opposition like we saw last night. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Thinking back to the last time we were decent defensively in the 5th place season and it's easy to forget we had two stay home full backs in Simpson and for at least about a half of the season R.Taylor. We also had Cabaye who apart from the odd occasion later in the season played very deep and made plenty of tackles. We had the good version of Tiote before he turned shit. We had Jonas who was playing as a very defensive winger most of the time and doing a very good job of it (stoke away as the perfect example). So when you compare that to now it's easy to see that there are far more elements to this poor defence than simply saying our centre backs are poor. Hate to drone on but again most of this is down to the manager and how he setting up the team. We can still field Williamson/Taylor, Colo,Santon,Krul, Cabaye,Tiote and Jonas from those that were here in a defensive sense from the 5th placed season. It is not the personal it is how they are being set up and trained. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Taylor will make mistakes but he's physically decent and won't bend over for the opposition like we saw last night. Yeah he was brilliant in his last performance. I cannot wait until the guy returns so he run around consistently hurting the team, puffing his chest out, playing to the supporters, and suffering another "unfortunate injury". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I could go on all day about that side's simplistic greatness. Including having strikers that can win a header/hold up the ball. But moreover - that side was organised and worked very hard to a man. Real spirit. That's gone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Taylor will make mistakes but he's physically decent and won't bend over for the opposition like we saw last night. Yeah he was brilliant in his last performance. I cannot wait until the guy returns so he run around consistently hurting the team, puffing his chest out, playing to the supporters, and suffering another "unfortunate injury". Who would you play at CB? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Both have played well in our shirt in the past - Taylor more often in the top flight for obvious reasons - but ultimately neither are good enough. Taylor's much better on the ball and offers some semblance of a threat at set pieces, Williamson is relatively dependable at the basics, decent at winning defensive headers and is more acutely aware of his limitations. Doesn't really matter tbh, we'll just be cycling through them all during the season because we're crap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I could go on all day about that side's simplistic greatness. Including having strikers that can win a header/hold up the ball. But moreover - that side was organised and worked very hard to a man. Real spirit. That's gone. We had a very different aide with an entirely different style of play that managed to win something 8 out of 11, six matches in a row, and beat Chelsea (away) and Liverpool in that same season. Stop referencing things from this time like they actually have any correlation to now. The vast majority of those players are still here as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Taylor will make mistakes but he's physically decent and won't bend over for the opposition like we saw last night. Yeah he was brilliant in his last performance. I cannot wait until the guy returns so he run around consistently hurting the team, puffing his chest out, playing to the supporters, and suffering another "unfortunate injury". Who would you play at CB? I think you are overestimating the deficiencies of the two players on one ridiculously poor performance. These two are still our best option. I wish we had a quality player to challenge them but there isn't one. As I said, Taylor was terrible in our first match and has been terrible many times before at a fairly consistent rate. I would change things if there are more performances of this nature or to accommodate Yanga-Mbiwa moving to right back if Debuchy returns to form, but I would rather not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I think putting Mapou to RB in the short-term is the right thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey_C_73 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Just an observation......but I noticed that not a single player in our team ever passes the ball to Williamson, I think he received ONE pass in the second half yesterday. Our players prefer to pass back to Krul or hoof it up field, rather than pass to Williamson in space. I was at the Benfica game at St James last season when I noticed this for the first time - they purposely try to avoid passing to him! It makes you wonder what the other players think of him, they obviously don't rate him! To be fair he didn't do too bad when he came on yesterday, but it's obviously a waste of a position in the team if he can't contribute when we are in possession. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I think putting Mapou to RB in the short-term is the right thing to do. Agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I could go on all day about that side's simplistic greatness. Including having strikers that can win a header/hold up the ball. But moreover - that side was organised and worked very hard to a man. Real spirit. That's gone. We had a very different aide with an entirely different style of play that managed to win something 8 out of 11, six matches in a row, and beat Chelsea (away) and Liverpool in that same season. Stop referencing things from this time like they actually have any correlation to now. The vast majority of those players are still here as well. I hope this reply makes sense to someone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 You could even make out a case for playing Mapou at left back. Why he hasn't attempted 3 at the back with a sweeper and wing backs I don't know. Santon and Debuchy seem ideal wing back types. Still I guess that involves the manager doing a bit of coaching . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiLvOR Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I think putting Mapou to RB in the short-term is the right thing to do. Agreed. Whenever he plays fullback he looks far more comfortable to me, he's also decent at skinning people as we've seen* so it's worth a go. *Can't remember the game exactly, but he was left back and he managed to blitz down the wing a few times and offer some actual width. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now