Heron Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 He's an IRA sympathising arsehole and I hope his career gets ended ASAP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Ron Vlaar has done his knee again. http://www.khalidzerrou.com/ron-vlaar-english/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 At a Liverpool press conference in Australia with Kolo Toure and Brendan Rodgers James Pearce @JamesPearceEcho 30m30 minutes ago Toure on running off from a koala: "I'm just not a fan of animals. There's been a dog at home for 7 years and I've never even touched it." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 At a Liverpool press conference in Australia with Kolo Toure and Brendan Rodgers James Pearce @JamesPearceEcho 30m30 minutes ago Toure on running off from a koala: "I'm just not a fan of animals. There's been a dog at home for 7 years and I've never even touched it." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Toure hiding from said dog http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article1455418.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Kolo%20Toure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Won't wear a poppy which is to commemorate all those who have lost their lives in all wars not just British, turns his back on the British national anthem. Lives in Britain getting paid millions playing for British clubs. It's his choice whether or not to wear a poppy. Your post is strikingly similar to a Britain First style "IT'S A DISGRACE, LIKE AND SHARE IF YOU AGREE" Facebook thing that all the pikeys drool over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Club sides playing the national anthem is very strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Why have West Brom bought him ffs? They have no wingers and he hardly cost anything. Decent enough deal for them. Bit of a lie actually, they do have wingers, just none (apart from McManaman) who can actually beat a man. He'll never play. Pulis was dishing up 5 defensive midfielders infront of 4 centre backs that season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 This Thierry Henry advert is fucking awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Won't wear a poppy which is to commemorate all those who have lost their lives in all wars not just British, turns his back on the British national anthem. Lives in Britain getting paid millions playing for British clubs. It's his choice whether or not to wear a poppy. Your post is strikingly similar to a Britain First style "IT'S A DISGRACE, LIKE AND SHARE IF YOU AGREE" Facebook thing that all the pikeys drool over. 6 people from the estate he grew up in were murdered by the British army in Bloody Sunday so I understand him not wearing the poppy but all he had to do here was just turn towards the flag and look at the ground while the anthem was played Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 But why is turning and looking at the ground a valid decision, but not turning isn't? You seem to be admitting he's allowed to show his disapproval. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 But why is turning and looking at the ground a valid decision, but not turning isn't? You seem to be admitting he's allowed to show his disapproval. By doing this it smacks of him just looking for attention IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 I think McClean is a horrid little cunt FYI, but he can do what he wants. Nobody should feel they "have to" do anything, as long as it's not unlawful by not complying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Bet he isn't complaining when he gets paid in pounds that have the Queen's face on. It's an insult to all our brave hero soldiers that have died to ensure his freedom. He should be made to go and apologise to them all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Playing the national anthem for a club team is going to lead to these issues. He's not representing Great Britain, he's representing West Brom. He obviously has particularly strong objections, can't really hold that against him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Playing the national anthem for a club team is going to lead to these issues. He's not representing Great Britain, he's representing West Brom. He obviously has particularly strong objections, can't really hold that against him. You can hold them against him in the same way that he is free to have them. Despite Disco's sarcastic remark, I think there is an element of hypocrisy in what he does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 I'm with the Facebook mongs here like, he's being a complete freak staging a visible political protest before a fucking friendly He needs to get over himself, the small-time bellend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Playing the national anthem for a club team is going to lead to these issues. He's not representing Great Britain, he's representing West Brom. He obviously has particularly strong objections, can't really hold that against him. You can hold them against him in the same way that he is free to have them. Despite Disco's sarcastic remark, I think there is an element of hypocrisy in what he does. What I meant was, if someone has a moral objection then they have to do something about it. I can't object to that. As far as I'm aware you don't need to swear allegiance to the Queen to work in England, so I'm not sure where the hypocrisy could be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Playing the national anthem for a club team is going to lead to these issues. He's not representing Great Britain, he's representing West Brom. He obviously has particularly strong objections, can't really hold that against him. You can hold them against him in the same way that he is free to have them. Despite Disco's sarcastic remark, I think there is an element of hypocrisy in what he does. What I meant was, if someone has a moral objection then they have to do something about it. I can't object to that. As far as I'm aware you don't need to swear allegiance to the Queen to work in England, so I'm not sure where the hypocrisy could be. He was refusing to face the English flag. It's obviously not illegal, it's just absolutely pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 What Triggs said like, attention seeking bellend. Was it right he stood in a game against England and didn't do anything then, if so why now ffs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 I think it's more about not wanting to represent the UK, it wouldn't matter if he was playing against England. I don't see why everyone objects so much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Playing the national anthem for a club team is going to lead to these issues. He's not representing Great Britain, he's representing West Brom. He obviously has particularly strong objections, can't really hold that against him. You can hold them against him in the same way that he is free to have them. Despite Disco's sarcastic remark, I think there is an element of hypocrisy in what he does. What I meant was, if someone has a moral objection then they have to do something about it. I can't object to that. As far as I'm aware you don't need to swear allegiance to the Queen to work in England, so I'm not sure where the hypocrisy could be. What is the meaning of his protest then? He's protesting against the historical actions of a country but then saying well I'm happy to live in it in its current state. It just seems a weird protest considering he seems to have accepted that it is a bad part of history which isn't repeating itself, in the same way. I don't want to get all flippant, and accept that the events in questions are in living memory, but no-one turns their back to the Germans during national anthems etc. Like I say, I understand that could be construed as flippant but the principle is the same isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Didn't Ozil protest against the German national anthem, and he plays for them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted July 19, 2015 Share Posted July 19, 2015 Just doesn't sing it apparently? I wouldn't sing God Save the Queen like on the account of it being lyrically the most embarrassing National Anthem ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts