BlueStar Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:48, leffe186 said: Quote Based on other events - teams lost all points gained in games where they fielded an illegible player (so minus 1pt from the Southampton tie) and a team was also deducted 1pt for fielding an illegible player in a game that they lost (so minus another 3 points). Which would put them on 21 points Get in. 지동원 Canny illegible like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:49, Toon's Taylor said: Quote Also the point was gained against Crystal Palace, were I them I'd be beyond p*ssed off over it. Thought it was Southampton. Well that would be typical if it actually ended our chances of 8th. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:49, Toon's Taylor said: Quote Also the point was gained against Crystal Palace, were I them I'd be beyond pissed off over it. Thought it was Southampton. indeed it was, read the fixtue list the wrong way round Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 Just read this..... eeesh! Worth remembering that Margaret Byrne sits on the board of the FA Council, she represents the Premier League on that board. From the outside looking in, it could appear that she is using her influence on that board to try and sweep this under the carpet. Don't think we've heard the last of this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 Ah man. It'd be hilarious if they were deducted points Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1265392/Hartlepool-plead-innocence-Brighton-boss-Gus-Poyet-demands-points-deduction-fielding-suspended-Gary-Liddle.html Poyet told his club's official website, www.seagulls.co.uk: 'I am sure Hartlepool did not realise he was suspended. It was not a case of cheating, but they made a mistake and that player should not have been on the pitch so the three points should go to the opposition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:54, cp40 said: Just read this..... eeesh! Worth remembering that Margaret Byrne sits on the board of the FA Council, she represents the Premier League on that board. From the outside looking in, it could appear that she is using her influence on that board to try and sweep this under the carpet. Don't think we've heard the last of this. almost certain to be legal action if sunderland stay up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 Hell on if them 4 points keep them up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:58, bowlingcrofty said: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1265392/Hartlepool-plead-innocence-Brighton-boss-Gus-Poyet-demands-points-deduction-fielding-suspended-Gary-Liddle.html Poyet told his club's official website, www.seagulls.co.uk: 'I am sure Hartlepool did not realise he was suspended. It was not a case of cheating, but they made a mistake and that player should not have been on the pitch so the three points should go to the opposition. "The Football League has to be careful with the decision they make. It does not matter if they did it with intention or not, the only decision they can make in this instance - and I would say the same if my team were the guilty party - is to give the three points to the opposition." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 You couldn't write comedy like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 21:00, David Icke - Son of God said: Quote http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1265392/Hartlepool-plead-innocence-Brighton-boss-Gus-Poyet-demands-points-deduction-fielding-suspended-Gary-Liddle.html Poyet told his club's official website, www.seagulls.co.uk: 'I am sure Hartlepool did not realise he was suspended. It was not a case of cheating, but they made a mistake and that player should not have been on the pitch so the three points should go to the opposition. "The Football League has to be careful with the decision they make. It does not matter if they did it with intention or not, the only decision they can make in this instance - and I would say the same if my team were the guilty party - is to give the three points to the opposition." So effectively in this case, knock one point off Sunderland and give two to Southampton. The battle for 1st between us & Stoke is on! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:31, BlueStar said: So the authorities have known since October, how were they able to continue on the cup? Remember this? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2244501/Bradford-City-appeal-expulsion-FA-Cup-fielding-ineligible-player.html That was overturned though wasn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 21:07, Wullie said: Quote So the authorities have known since October, how were they able to continue on the cup? Remember this? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2244501/Bradford-City-appeal-expulsion-FA-Cup-fielding-ineligible-player.html That was overturned though wasn't it? Hartlepool got docked 3 points mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:48, leffe186 said: Quote Based on other events - teams lost all points gained in games where they fielded an illegible player (so minus 1pt from the Southampton tie) and a team was also deducted 1pt for fielding an illegible player in a game that they lost (so minus another 3 points). Which would put them on 21 points Get in. Dammit!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 I reckon everyone should just forget about it and pretend it never happened. Fielding a player who had no right to be on the park isn't a big deal anyway, happens all of the time. Can't see what the fuss is about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:54, cp40 said: Just read this..... eeesh! Worth remembering that Margaret Byrne sits on the board of the FA Council, she represents the Premier League on that board. From the outside looking in, it could appear that she is using her influence on that board to try and sweep this under the carpet. Don't think we've heard the last of this. Potential conflict of interests there, straightaway. Corruption. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:30, Wilson said: Hope a few of you have taken a leaf from the RTG book of Napolean Complex and wrote a letter of pure disgust to the FA. Or posted an e-mail address to the appropriate body, along with a handy 'cut-n-paste' complaint. Followed by 40 pages of 'done', 'done', 'done', 'done'.... But to be fair, I don't think any points deduction is required, I would rather not give them the excuse of a conspiracy theory. They're going down on their own terms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 21:41, bhoywhonder said: Quote Hope a few of you have taken a leaf from the RTG book of Napolean Complex and wrote a letter of pure disgust to the FA. Or posted an e-mail address to the appropriate body, along with a handy 'cut-n-paste' complaint. Followed by 40 pages of 'done', 'done', 'done', 'done'.... But to be fair, I don't think any points deduction is required, I would rather not give them the excuse of a conspiracy theory. They're going down on their own terms. Then we'd have the Wembo stick to beat them with, swings and roundabouts Cheating spam hampers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 On 03/04/2014 at 20:43, Foluwashola said: Playing the useless nonce was a self-enforced points deduction tbf. This Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 As far as I can see, it once again highlights how biased/corrupt/incompetent/wilfully blind the FA is if they don't enforce a points deduction. Protect the top league because that's where the money is. Shit on the rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Some interesting theories bouncing around on the sunshine coach Quote Happens more often than you'd think. It just isn't usually reported and certainly not in such an overtly sensationalist way. Don't think it's a coincidence that this happened months ago yet has only just been reported after The Sun were banned. Reading between the lines, I think it's a story a journo got hold of a while back but was sitting on to incur a little good will from the club, but now the gloves are considered off with regard the nationals. Quote Worth remembering that Margaret Byrne sits on the board of the FA Council, she represents the Premier League on that board. From the outside looking in, it could appear that she is using her influence on that board to try and sweep this under the carpet. Don't think we've heard the last of this. Either way this looks like it could turn into a shitstorm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 I think the fairest would be deduct points gained for the games he played. So basically deduct Sunderland a point. Not harder than that really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 On 04/04/2014 at 06:22, Felipão said: I think the fairest would be deduct points gained for the games he played. So basically deduct Sunderland a point. Not harder than that really. No. A point deduction and replaying the game/s Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 On 04/04/2014 at 06:45, DebuchyAndTheBeast said: Quote I think the fairest would be deduct points gained for the games he played. So basically deduct Sunderland a point. Not harder than that really. No. A point deduction and replaying the game/s Not sure if serious, but why replay the game? That's moronic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Make him do another job he's not eligible for? Like be a fireman for a day or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts