shintonsghost Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. her meal ticket, she doesnt want to lose it man, why the hell would she stand by him after all this shite, guilty or not, money money money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Because I'm quite obviously taking the piss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 like someone has said earlier.. the poor lass is watching her life crumble around her and her daughter and natural human instinct is to not give up on that surely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. her meal ticket, she doesnt want to lose it man, why the hell would she stand by him after all this shite, guilty or not, money money money From her evidence it would seem her family aren't short of a bob or two anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Aye, they're not married so she gets fuck all and she's got a little baby to take care of. Can't blame the lass for waiting to see what happens before throwing away the security for her and her kid. It's always possible that things just haven't been released publicly anarl. I doubt her first instinct is to rush out and tell the press exactly what's happening between them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Surely her "defence" of him being honest doesn't hold any water when he's spent their entire relationship cheating on her with "multiple other women (girls?)". I've seen plenty of people stick to bad relationships and go back once cheated on because they "love" that person or want to try and make it work. I think it's unfair to immediately label her a gold digger just because you can't see the world through her eyes. It could very well be just about the money but it could just as easily be about failed human nature, I can't judge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Their bairn too, ultimately we should probably just let her get on with it without calling her a slapper. We know nothing about her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I actually have some sympathies with her. She probably believed that she was living the dream, footballers WAG money no object and she now faces being a single mother on child benefit with the stigma of this following her and her daughter for the rest of their lives. From her perspective her (and her daughters) world has fallen apart so for that I feel sorry for her. She has done nothing wrong other than try to keep her dream alive, she may be misguided in that but to crucify her is unnecessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I can't speak for anyone else, but I know that's what I've been hoping for all along. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm only interested in his seeing his ex-gf suffer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm only interested in his seeing his ex-gf suffer. Definitely the only one to blame here. Money grabbing is a serious crime. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 It's enough to drive a man to nonce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. I think the bit that I've put in bold is the main point there tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. I think the bit that I've put in bold is the main point there tbf. We'd not rather anything you fruit, he's already admitted it, it just depends on the extent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I actually have some sympathies with her. She probably believed that she was living the dream, footballers WAG money no object and she now faces being a single mother on child benefit with the stigma of this following her and her daughter for the rest of their lives. From her perspective her (and her daughters) world has fallen apart so for that I feel sorry for her. She has done nothing wrong other than try to keep her dream alive, she may be misguided in that but to crucify her is unnecessary. She'll be entitled to some money from AJ until the bairn is 16 or 18. Probably not the same but better than nothing. This might help her modelling career too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. I think the bit that I've put in bold is the main point there tbf. We'd not rather anything you fruit, he's already admitted it, it just depends on the extent. I'm not pointing at fingers at anyone in particular, but the thread has had that feel to it at times. That it's more about how it's bad for Sunderland than it is for the girl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I actually have some sympathies with her. She probably believed that she was living the dream, footballers WAG money no object and she now faces being a single mother on child benefit with the stigma of this following her and her daughter for the rest of their lives. From her perspective her (and her daughters) world has fallen apart so for that I feel sorry for her. She has done nothing wrong other than try to keep her dream alive, she may be misguided in that but to crucify her is unnecessary. She'll be entitled to some money from AJ until the bairn is 16 or 18. Probably not the same but better than nothing. This might help her modelling career too. Not sure what sort of modelling she does but I can't see how having your partner getting done for noncing can be much of a career boost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I doubt she'd stay with him just for the money as she clearly comes from a wealthy background. It's more likely she was trying to stay with him for the baby. Massive leap to call her a money grabber etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I don't 'hope' he's fingered her, I hope he gets charged for it though as I think he's done it. The girl has said he has and he's calling her a liar and saying she's after money. It has nothing to do with Sunderland though, even if that's the reason I'm interested in the case in the first place. So Taylor has a bit of a point I suppose, but it's a bit different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I don't 'hope' he's fingered her, I hope he gets charged for it though as I think he's done it. The girl has said he has and he's calling her a liar and saying she's after money. It has nothing to do with Sunderland though, even if that's the reason I'm interested in the case in the first place. So Taylor has a bit of a point I suppose, but it's a bit different That's it he's guilty then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts