Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quick question that popped into my head...

 

If Johnson told Sunderland the full truth when it came out, then why has Fletcher turned his back on Johnson after the guilty verdict and refused to come to court?

Surely, Johnson/Sunderland would not have lied to all of the playing staff - if they have, imagine knowing your employer lied to you for 11 months and allowed a nonce to work alongside you.

 

  If you are summoned to court, you HAVE to go. I'm just summising here, but, perhaps the prosecution think they have enough without his evidence. possibly the defense would rather not have him on the stand. For whatever reason.  BTW are Fletcher and Johnson good mates ?

 

He wasn't a prosecution witness, he was a defence witness.

 

Johnson told the court that Fletcher refused to come to court after his guilty pleas, which begs the question as to why Johnson was "so honest" with SAFC and his girlfriend - but failed to tell one of his good mates.

 

I have no idea why he wasn't summoned to court, especially as he was a witness for Johnson.

 

I tried to cover all points without being too obvious. Perhaps the defence did not want Mr J and Mr M singing from seperate hymn sheets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

today:

 

Judge Jonathan Rose will sum up the evidence for the jurors. After doing that, Judge Rose will send the jury out to consider their verdict

 

 

 

Could there be a verdict this afternoon? Or is that too soon to expect it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going back to football.  These fuckers are going to get out of it, yet again.  Allardyce will get them to grind enough points out and they look far more likely of fluking some results, than we do. 

 

4-1-4-1, though.  With 3 defensive minded midfielders  :anguish:  They may well stay up.  But fuck me.  Having to watch Allardyce football and that setup for the foreseeable future  :kasper:  I almost feel sorry for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going back to football.  These fuckers are going to get out of it, yet again.  Allardyce will get them to grind enough points out and they look far more likely of fluking some results, than we do. 

 

4-1-4-1, though.  With 3 defensive minded midfielders  :anguish:  They may well stay up.  But fuck me.  Having to watch Allardyce football and that setup for the foreseeable future  :kasper:  I almost feel sorry for them.

Comes down to us again in a way, we beat them we could go a long way to saving ourselves and really dumping them in the shit, but they'll probably waltz off with the points as per.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If one charge is 'Digital Penetration', then the 'You felt really turned on' text might swing that one.

 

If the other is a 'BJ', then that might be more difficult. Only thing that could point to that is the text that says 'It was ok, wasn't it?', but that could be anything.

 

However, the jury (or majority) might think if he's done one, he probably did the other.  :dontknow:

 

Either way, hope he still goes down for the charges already admitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been catching up on this mostly through here day by day, as I'm interested in the verdict and the case. I have to say though that I find the repeated discussion of whether his girlfriend is there or not a bit disturbing, some folk seem more interested in whether he loses his partner or not than they do in his guilt or otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

I was in mackem land today and saw a few people wearing AJ tops, one being a lass. I was shocked. I would have taken a photo had I not been driving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...