Dr.Spaceman Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Us on a daily basis via our preferred media partners and the dribbler at the Chronicle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 What club denies every rumour in the press? If you think the club has never lied to us intentionally in order to help season ticket sales that's fair enough. Last word wins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Rooney? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The last one was claiming interest in Charlie Austin when anyone with half a brain knew he only wanted to go to Southampton or Bournmouth due to the circumstances. We were never truly in for him let's be honest. So no proof whatsoever that the club created Austin rumours to appease the fans? I've got no problem criticising this regime but let's actually use things they have done rather than rumours, gossip and exaggeration. Rooney? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Never mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The last one was claiming interest in Charlie Austin when anyone with half a brain knew he only wanted to go to Southampton or Bournmouth due to the circumstances. We were never truly in for him let's be honest. So no proof whatsoever that the club created Austin rumours to appease the fans? I've got no problem criticising this regime but let's actually use things they have done rather than rumours, gossip and exaggeration. Rooney? Rooney? You mean that SD shite. Or do you mean in 2003? When we ACTUALLY made a bid for a player we had no hope in signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 The last one was claiming interest in Charlie Austin when anyone with half a brain knew he only wanted to go to Southampton or Bournmouth due to the circumstances. We were never truly in for him let's be honest. So no proof whatsoever that the club created Austin rumours to appease the fans? I've got no problem criticising this regime but let's actually use things they have done rather than rumours, gossip and exaggeration. Rooney? Rooney? You mean that SD shite. Or do you mean in 2003? When we ACTUALLY made a bid for a player we had no hope in signing. This club is the football team arm of SD. Of course the club put that story out! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 TBF if you thought that rumour about Rooney was true you deserve to be lied to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Lee Ryder: However, the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more than the £14million that Tottenham Hotspur are asking for. Thought this was hilarious until i read the actual article this evening. Why miss off the last 5 words of the sentence? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 TBF if you thought that rumour about Rooney was true you deserve to be lied to Rooney says it happened personally?! If you don't believe it you must be mad! Shepherd definitely made a bid like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 TBF if you thought that rumour about Rooney was true you deserve to be lied to Rooney says it happened personally?! If you don't believe it you must be mad! Shepherd definitely made a bid like The Sports Direct rumour one a few years ago, not that one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Lee Ryder: However, the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more than the £14million that Tottenham Hotspur are asking for. Thought this was hilarious until i read the actual article this evening. Why miss off the last 5 words of the sentence? What? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Lee Ryder: However, the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more than the £14million that Tottenham Hotspur are asking for. Thought this was hilarious until i read the actual article this evening. Why miss off the last 5 words of the sentence? What? The actual quote in the Chronicle is- However the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more that the current Spurs asking price of £14million if a bidding war develops Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Lee Ryder: However, the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more than the £14million that Tottenham Hotspur are asking for. Thought this was hilarious until i read the actual article this evening. Why miss off the last 5 words of the sentence? What? The actual quote in the Chronicle is- However the Chronicle understands the Magpies are not prepared to bid more that the current Spurs asking price of £14million if a bidding war develops It wasn't when i posted the first quote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Chance of a conspiracy theory here then. Who's trying to discredit Ryder? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 That assumes he has any to begin with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Well like most conspiracy theories it's flawed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 The fact this thread hasnt been used in 15 hours just 5 days from the transfer deadline says it all about this club Really is going to be Remy on loan or absolutely nothing isnt it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Banaloona Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 If its nothing then the club really needs to be hung out to dry irrespective of the spending that has already took place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 If its nothing then the club really needs to be hung out to dry irrespective of the spending that has already took place. Next summer is the real test though. Not to mention the fact that 40000+ wouldnt give a shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 The fact this thread hasnt been used in 15 hours just 5 days from the transfer deadline says it all about this club Really is going to be Remy on loan or absolutely nothing isnt it? If we don't get Remy then of course it will be like a new signing when Cisse returns from injury. Then as soon as he gets crocked again we're fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Doubt it - Mackems just signed a CH as well: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/490612/Exclusive-Sunderland-Newcastle-battle-Leeds-star Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Doubt it - Mackems just signed a CH as well: http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/490612/Exclusive-Sunderland-Newcastle-battle-Leeds-star Us signing a 31-year old Championship player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuy_O Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2016/01/27/report-newcastle-and-crystal-palace-among-premier-league-sides-c/?utm_medium=share%2Bbutton&utm_campaign=social%2Bmedia&utm_content=/en-gb/2016/01/27/report-newcastle-and-crystal-palace-among-premier-league-sides-c/&utm_source=Twitter Gibbs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Can't see that being remotely true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts