Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/369068/Newcastle-preparing-for-spell-without-Alan-Pardew-as-boss-awaits-headbutt-punishment

Pardew and his employers are bracing themselves for a stadium ban.

 

He could be ordered to stay away from matches for anything up to 10 games and hit with a touchline ban for even longer.

 

Pardew has already discussed the implications of such a sentence with club officials and his own backroom team.

 

He believes the team will be in safe hands with his No. 2 John Carver taking on managerial duties on matchdays.

 

The manager is expected to travel with the squad for Saturday’s match at Fulham but will not be allowed into Craven Cottage or any other ground they play at, while he serves his ban.

 

Newcastle have already taken steps to install video equipment in a nearby hotel so that Pardew can watch a live stream of the game and the same arrangements will be used for future games both home and away.

 

And while he won’t be allowed any contact with either his coaches or players from an hour before the game until after the final whistle, Pardew will give his team talk at lunchtime.

 

He will then debrief Carver and fellow coaches Steve Stone and Andy Woodman after the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I will once more be a prophet. If Alan Pardew receives a stadium ban and results get even worse for Newcastle United, then the result will not be the slandering of his name and of his character, but some will claim that this is proof of the good work he is doing and of his importance to the football club.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any no-contact ban is stupid anyway as there are infinite ways to circumvent it. You could do it the troll way like Mourinho or go the subtle and technically correct 'relay to secretary who then contacts the coaches'. Provided he's not having fun with the secretary of course.

 

I sure hope the FA adds a hefty suspended ban on top of what he rightly deserves for the offence. It should make the manager and his coaches think twice before they persist in showing indiscipline and seeking confrontations with the opposition teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should Everton have sacked Moyes when they nearly went down?

 

How much money had Moyes been able to spend when Everton were in trouble..?

Remind me again, HOW much did NUFC have to spend to bail out Pardew in January last year and even after that, we just missed going down by ONE point..??

 

What sort of record for being sacked did Moyes have compared to Pardew before they joined their respective clubs..?

 

Has Moyes been involved in as many controversial incidents as Pardew..??

 

You are just a Pardew apologist .

 

 

I thought we should have been spending much more than we were?

 

Which means what in the context of this subject..?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should Everton have sacked Moyes when they nearly went down?

 

How much money had Moyes been able to spend when Everton were in trouble..?

Remind me again, HOW much did NUFC have to spend to bail out Pardew in January last year and even after that, we just missed going down by ONE point..??

 

A paltry amount, I thought was the consensus on here? No matter how much Everton spent, Moyes' target at the start of that season won't have been a million miles from ours.

 

What sort of record for being sacked did Moyes have compared to Pardew before they joined their respective clubs..?

 

Totally irrelevant to whether nearly getting relegated is a sacking offence

 

Has Moyes been involved in as many controversial incidents as Pardew..??

 

Also totally irrelevant

 

You are just a Pardew apologist .

 

No, just not necessarily hell-bent on slaughtering him at every turn.

 

If you really think that the points you call 'totally irrelevant' are indeed that, I wouldn't put you in charge of a whelk stall...I suppose you would think its 'totally irrelevant' if you found out that a Fund manager with dodgy history was in charge of your financial affairs and your investments were struggling...

 

Try harder next time.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

hopefully they throw the f***ing book at the prick, force ashley's hand to sack him

 

 

http://muslimvillage.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Unveiling-ceremony-of-the-worlds-largest-Holy-Quran-8-600x399.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest tollemache

Should Everton have sacked Moyes when they nearly went down?

 

How much money had Moyes been able to spend when Everton were in trouble..?

Remind me again, HOW much did NUFC have to spend to bail out Pardew in January last year and even after that, we just missed going down by ONE point..??

 

A paltry amount, I thought was the consensus on here? No matter how much Everton spent, Moyes' target at the start of that season won't have been a million miles from ours.

 

What sort of record for being sacked did Moyes have compared to Pardew before they joined their respective clubs..?

 

Totally irrelevant to whether nearly getting relegated is a sacking offence

 

Has Moyes been involved in as many controversial incidents as Pardew..??

 

Also totally irrelevant

 

You are just a Pardew apologist .

 

No, just not necessarily hell-bent on slaughtering him at every turn.

 

If you really think that the points you call 'totally irrelevant' are indeed that, I wouldn't put you in charge of a whelk stall...I suppose you would think its 'totally irrelevant' if you found out that a Fund manager with dodgy history was in charge of your financial affairs and your investments were struggling...

 

Try harder next time.....

 

OK, I'll try harder.

 

Almost every football manager has at some point been sacked. Some absolutely fantastic managers have been sacked several times because that is just what usually happens to managers, and you certainly don't hold it against them when appraising their performance in their current job. So whether or not a manager should be sacked for nearly getting relegated has nothing to do with their history of getting sacked from other jobs at all. You're judging them on the job they're doing, not the 2 or 3 jobs they've had before, which you presumably took into account before you chose to give them a crack of the whip at your club.

 

Whether or not a manager should be sacked for nearly getting relegated also has nothing to do with how controversial they are or have been in the past. Some great managers have attracted a lot of controversy (Mourinho for example) and so have some crappy ones (Paolo Di Canio for example). Again, that is something you look at if you're considering hiring them, rather than suddenly making it part of your reasoning if their performance dips, because that would be weird, stupid and unfair.

 

The only things relevant to whether or not a manager should be sacked for nearly getting relegated are things like this:

 

- How much worse than their expected performance that was

- Whether there are mitigating circumstances for that performance

- Whether you think the next season will be much better

- That's pretty much it

 

You're confusing "things that might influence your decision to hire a manager in the first place" with "things that might influence your decision to sack a manager who nearly got relegated" which is a pretty simple distinction, so you fucking try harder.

 

As for your fund manager analogy, that doesn't really work. If you suddenly found out your fund manager had a dodgy history, but he was absolutely killing it with the fund he was managing for you, you'd probably keep him on. If he was performing in a dodgy way, you'd probably get shot of him - just as with the football manager, you'd judge him on performance. It also doesn't work because you're imagining a world in which you didn't previously know the fund manager's track record (i.e; if you'd known then you wouldn't have hired him, or perhaps he deceived you), but all football managers' CV's are there for all to see before they're hired, and that is the point at which you take their track record into account. So it's an utterly useless analogy from head to toe and here once again I'm going to suggest that you put a bit more effort in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

- How much worse than their expected performance that was

- Whether there are mitigating circumstances for that performance

- Whether you think the next season will be much better

- That's pretty much it

 

so you agree, he should have been sacked?  glad we cleared that up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they allowed to stream the games?

 

Also half time team talks at lunch time :lol: I suppose they are the same every match anyway.

 

They can just record two:

 

Winning - 'Sit deep and pump it long'

Drawing / Losing - 'Pump it long'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they allowed to stream the games?

 

Also half time team talks at lunch time :lol: I suppose they are the same every match anyway.

 

They can just record two:

 

Winning - 'Sit deep and pump it long'

Drawing / Losing - 'Pump it long'

 

Myth

 

Only Arsenal play less long balls than us, we are second bottom of the long ball stats/per game, joint with Man City.

 

http://www.whoscored.com/Regions/252/Tournaments/2/Seasons/3853/Stages/7794/TeamStatistics/England-Premier-League-2013-2014

 

Aston Villa  71

Southampton 70

Fulham         68

Everton         67

Norwich         67

Hull                 66

Cardiff         66

West Ham         66

Swansea         65

Sunderland 65

Tottenham         64

Chelsea         63

Man United 62

WBA            62

Crystal Palace 62

Stoke         60

Liverpool         56

Man City         55

NUFC          55

Arsenal         54

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they allowed to stream the games?

 

Also half time team talks at lunch time :lol: I suppose they are the same every match anyway.

 

They can just record two:

 

Winning - 'Sit deep and pump it long'

Drawing / Losing - 'Pump it long'

 

Myth

 

Only Arsenal play less long balls than us, we are second bottom of the long ball stats/per game, joint with Man City.

 

http://www.whoscored.com/Regions/252/Tournaments/2/Seasons/3853/Stages/7794/TeamStatistics/England-Premier-League-2013-2014

 

Aston Villa  71

Southampton 70

Fulham         68

Everton         67

Norwich         67

Hull                 66

Cardiff         66

West Ham         66

Swansea         65

Sunderland 65

Tottenham         64

Chelsea         63

Man United 62

WBA            62

Crystal Palace 62

Stoke         60

Liverpool         56

Man City         55

NUFC          55

Arsenal         54

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Are they allowed to stream the games?

 

Also half time team talks at lunch time :lol: I suppose they are the same every match anyway.

 

They can just record two:

 

Winning - 'Sit deep and pump it long'

Drawing / Losing - 'Pump it long'

 

Myth

 

Only Arsenal play less long balls than us, we are second bottom of the long ball stats/per game, joint with Man City.

 

http://www.whoscored.com/Regions/252/Tournaments/2/Seasons/3853/Stages/7794/TeamStatistics/England-Premier-League-2013-2014

 

Aston Villa  71

Southampton 70

Fulham         68

Everton         67

Norwich         67

Hull                 66

Cardiff         66

West Ham         66

Swansea         65

Sunderland 65

Tottenham         64

Chelsea         63

Man United 62

WBA            62

Crystal Palace 62

Stoke         60

Liverpool         56

Man City         55

NUFC          55

Arsenal         54

 

Stats! You can prove anything with stats. I can see the long balls with my eyes man. I mean, clearly, they're not actually happening, but I can still see them with my eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...