AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 About right, expected between 5 and 10. Making them all complete stadium bans would be overly harsh IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:42, Ian W said: About right, expected between 5 and 10. Making them all complete stadium bans would be overly harsh IMO. Agree with this, it's a reasonable middle ground. Still, a pretty shocking thing for our manager to do and for the team to have to deal with. He's an embarrassment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 £160,000 down the pisser for nudging someone with his head. What a plank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The_Optimistic Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:46, Shay's Given Tim Flowers said: £160,000 down the pisser for nudging someone with his head. What a plank Speaking of which, would be a good gesture for the club to either give the £100k to charity or put it in the away supporters fund. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:42, Ian W said: About right, expected between 5 and 10. Making them all complete stadium bans would be overly harsh IMO. my opinion too, I wouldn't have agreed with it if it was all stadium bans as that would imply it was worse than the Ince incident which is just insane, my guess based on absolutely nothing is the 3 stadium ban is the headbutt punishment and 4 touchline for repeated stupidity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Seems very light to me. If an opposition manager did something like that at our place, we'd be fucking disappointed with only 7 games. Brings the game majorly into disrepute and 7 games seems very light for that to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Bailey Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Banned from your workplace. Utterly embarrassing and shocking that he hasn't been dismissed. On 11/03/2014 at 15:40, Robster said: Banned from his own stadium, man. What an absolute c***. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:48, The_Optimistic said: Quote £160,000 down the pisser for nudging someone with his head. What a plank Speaking of which, would be a good gesture for the club to either give the £100k to charity or put it in the away supporters fund. They did IIRC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 7 games is a hell of a long time for a manager not to be able to stand on the touchline TBF. It will definitely get to him in a big way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 He's just so, yuck. An embarrassment of a man really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Cant find myself that able to care about this. Our season needed some drama anyway, be interesting to see how we do without him at the games. What will his position be if we abolutely rinse the league without him on the touchline? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Twitter is full of some utter fucking chin lickers when it comes to our fans, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:51, Ian W said: 7 games is a hell of a long time for a manager not to be able to stand on the touchline TBF. It will definitely get to him in a big way. It'll provide some excellent evidence for the efficacy of his half time team talks though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Meh, it's a sensible ban imo. I think his touchline ban maybe should have been a little longer like to prevent him from nutting people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:57, Happy Face said: Quote 7 games is a hell of a long time for a manager not to be able to stand on the touchline TBF. It will definitely get to him in a big way. It'll provide some excellent evidence for the efficacy of his half time team talks though. You should know 7 games is too small a sample size for Ian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Doesn't make the slightest bit of difference anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 We now have a manager who's probably praying that we lose our next 7 games, and certainly the next 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:59, LRD said: You should know 7 games is too small a sample size for Ian. It's quite a small number statistically like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Be interesting to hear how the stadium ban will work. Does it mean he can't communicate with anyone at the club on the day of the match until the final whistle? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 16:01, Hanskissedhispantz said: We now have a manager who's probably praying that we lose our next 7 games, and certainly the next 3. Interesting philosophical concept. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 16:03, Dave said: Be interesting to hear how the stadium ban will work. Does it mean he can't communicate with anyone at the club on the day of the match until the final whistle? An hour before and after I think. Not 100% mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 15:36, LRD said: Surprised the FA didn't add on any suspended ban in view of his previous. I'm not. I always knew they would be lenient despite all the talk of making an example of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 On 11/03/2014 at 16:03, Dave said: Be interesting to hear how the stadium ban will work. Does it mean he can't communicate with anyone at the club on the day of the match until the final whistle? doubt it, will be literally a ban from ground , be able to do owt he wants, before- with phones,but bear in mind, be very hard for him to judge something he cant watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillClinton Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Just glad it's over. The media reaction somehow ended up being more embarrassing than the act itself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 he will be watching a stream, and on the phone to carver- who wont know he has a 3 min delay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts