Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 http://i39.tinypic.com/300tcwm.png :lesbian: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 It was also alarming, IMO, how much better Ben Arfa was than pretty much anyone else on your team when he came on. Not in Pardews opinion unfortunately. My Dad watched the game with me and he was saying to me "how the hell is a player that talented just sat on your bench till the last 10 minutes" He doesn't know my pain Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 Anyone else read this? Didn't know whether to laugh or cry http://www.viewfromablue.com/2014/01/13/newcastle-0-2-man-city-my-thoughts-3/? Really didn't take them long to become as detestable and self entitled as their neighbours did it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 I wonder what the man city fans thought of james milners goal at old trafford, the one when carlos tevez was stood directly in the keepers line of sight. on that occasion they argued that tavez wasn't interefering with play. ity's youtubeable for anyone that wants to watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 Is Nasri the new Phil Jones? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 It was also alarming, IMO, how much better Ben Arfa was than pretty much anyone else on your team when he came on. Not in Pardews opinion unfortunately. My Dad watched the game with me and he was saying to me "how the hell is a player that talented just sat on your bench till the last 10 minutes" He doesn't know my pain And it seems like Pardew's deluded opinion on HBA is working as many fans are seemingly okay with the most talented attacking player we have rotting on the bench. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted January 13, 2014 Share Posted January 13, 2014 Anyone else read this? Didn't know whether to laugh or cry http://www.viewfromablue.com/2014/01/13/newcastle-0-2-man-city-my-thoughts-3/? Really didn't take them long to become as detestable and self entitled as their neighbours did it? That's the Manc psyche though, they think they shit diamonds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Mike Jones isn't reffing a game this weekend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Mike Jones isn't reffing a game this weekend. Neither am i Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Canny annoying how the media can't talk about our goal without talking about the Mapou incident, as if they're somehow the same level of importance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Canny annoying how the media can't talk about our goal without talking about the Mapou incident, as if they're somehow the same level of importance. It's because the media are complicit in the bias towards the 'big' teams. They'll do anything possible to brush this under the carpet and it looks like they've got away with it. Theres not even been any serious debate about the manner in which the goal was ruled out. An incorrect decision is one thing, but this was something else entirely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 The Mapou tackle/pardew outburst have been given ludicrously OTT coverage. Pathetic stuff IMO Totally agree. It's embarrassing now but also completely expected. It was so obvious the media would ignore the offside goal and make non stories from Pardew swearing and Mbiwa tackle, as it was against one of the "big clubs". The thing is, those two events all stem from the complete lack of officiating that went on prior on the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 They were quite fair to Pardew on the Monday Night Club last night, everyone basically admitted that it's the sort of language that gets used all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Our pisspoor ITV regional news programme, which nowadays carries about 5 minutes of local news and is then padded out with generic nonsense, was just as bad last night. Hardly surprising when their sports presenter was seen joyously celebrating Sunderland's derby win a few seasons back. Their thinly veiled pro Sunderland agenda (and consequently as anti-Newcastle as they can feasibly be) had them bigging up our neighbours for no longer being clear bottom last night, and of course celebrated the greatest hat trick in living memory, conveniently omitting any lead up to the goals which would have exposed clear diving. The Newcastle report then focused mainly on Pardew's rant with the disallowed goal and that tackle getting roughly equal coverage thereafter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 But an unusually animated Pellegrini said: "If that is the rule of offside we will never have a player offside because other teams can make a wall for every free-kick inside the six-yard box, allow the goalkeeper to see the ball and when the kick is taken they move, they jump, they duck, they step aside. "I am surprised that someone can say that was not an offside, that's incredible. At the beginning of the season the rules on offside changed and a lot of teams put players in front of the goalkeeper, allow him to see the ball but always be standing there, and the referees said that was offside. "If you have three players and one moves and steps aside so the ball doesn't hit him, I don't understand how one person can say that's not offside." He added: "It was an unfair kick and he didn't need to do it. He just tried to make a foul to stop the counter attack and that is normal but the second kick was unfair and too high also. He didn't need to do it." And he said that Nasri is still fuming, explaining: "Of course he's very upset because he has to stop at this moment for six weeks with a serious injury." http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1681615/referee-correct-disallow-newcastle-goal?cc=4716 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 But an unusually animated Pellegrini said: "If that is the rule of offside we will never have a player offside because other teams can make a wall for every free-kick inside the six-yard box, allow the goalkeeper to see the ball and when the kick is taken they move, they jump, they duck, they step aside. "I am surprised that someone can say that was not an offside, that's incredible. At the beginning of the season the rules on offside changed and a lot of teams put players in front of the goalkeeper, allow him to see the ball but always be standing there, and the referees said that was offside. "If you have three players and one moves and steps aside so the ball doesn't hit him, I don't understand how one person can say that's not offside." He added: "It was an unfair kick and he didn't need to do it. He just tried to make a foul to stop the counter attack and that is normal but the second kick was unfair and too high also. He didn't need to do it." And he said that Nasri is still fuming, explaining: "Of course he's very upset because he has to stop at this moment for six weeks with a serious injury." http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1681615/referee-correct-disallow-newcastle-goal?cc=4716 Pardew was right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
womblemaster Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I hate to say this, but I can see the arguement here: `Had Gouffran not ducked, the shot would have hit him.. making it offside. ` By ducking he was interfering with play by distracting the goal keeper. IF gouff handt been standing in the flight of the ball, then the goal was legit. or at least jones would had to find another excuse to earn his 100k. city pay bonus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 That face. Those clothes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 W.T.F. is he wearing? Emo bitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I hate to say this, but I can see the arguement here: `Had Gouffran not ducked, the shot would have hit him.. making it offside. ` By ducking he was interfering with play by distracting the goal keeper. IF gouff handt been standing in the flight of the ball, then the goal was legit. or at least jones would had to find another excuse to earn his 100k. city pay bonus. It's definitely debatable, up to the ref to form an opinion. There's no definitive answer to these unfortunately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 The jeans are areet, fuck knas what he's playing at with the top and the hat though. Should ask for a refund on his face n'all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 I hate to say this, but I can see the arguement here: `Had Gouffran not ducked, the shot would have hit him.. making it offside. ` By ducking he was interfering with play by distracting the goal keeper. IF gouff handt been standing in the flight of the ball, then the goal was legit. or at least jones would had to find another excuse to earn his 100k. city pay bonus. The goal was legit though. "Interfering with an opponent is defined as: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball. "For example, by clearly obstructing the goalkeeper's line vision or movement. "It was a tough call but the goal that was disallowed does not meet the criteria to disallow the goal. Technically, it should have stood. That is the law." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 The jeans are areet, f*** knas what he's playing at with the top and the hat though. Should ask for a refund on his face n'all. They look like something han solo might wear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Exactly man, get with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now