Disco Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 Just because I wanted the shirt and because it would wind a few people up on here. Also since NUFC buy their stock off SD then does it matter who you get your stuff from or do NUFC still get a higher % if it's via their shop? Get the photos back up Stiffy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 It's actually offensive that this guy still plays for NUFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Just pay up the rest of his contract. . Well, according to the 2017/18 accounts, WE ALREADY FUCKING HAVE!!! Along with Saivet and Lazaar, amongst others. No doubt when the 19/20 accounts get published in 30 months time, everyone will have forgotten, and their wages (which were written off in an extraordinary piece of accounting chicanery) will quietly be added back onto the wage bill, and who would ask by then, as we try to stay in League One? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest covmag Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Clean slate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzgerald Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Fucking ginger dog Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Bombard the cunt’s social media. Let him know how much he’s not fucking wanted. Never known such a talentless arsehole to kick up such a stink at a world class manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 One of the worst things about this fucking shambles is the fact this little scrawny ginger talentless cunt will be smug as fuck. He’s back in the fold and knows the new fat twat in charge. He’ll be running through brick walls to get a new contract and he’ll probably fucking get it too. Hope he dies in fire tonight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 The thought of this prick in the middle, Ritchie on the right and Clark at CB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Just pay up the rest of his contract. . Well, according to the 2017/18 accounts, WE ALREADY FUCKING HAVE!!! Along with Saivet and Lazaar, amongst others. No doubt when the 19/20 accounts get published in 30 months time, everyone will have forgotten, and their wages (which were written off in an extraordinary piece of accounting chicanery) will quietly be added back onto the wage bill, and who would ask by then, as we try to stay in League One? That's a fucking good point actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Just pay up the rest of his contract. . Well, according to the 2017/18 accounts, WE ALREADY FUCKING HAVE!!! Along with Saivet and Lazaar, amongst others. No doubt when the 19/20 accounts get published in 30 months time, everyone will have forgotten, and their wages (which were written off in an extraordinary piece of accounting chicanery) will quietly be added back onto the wage bill, and who would ask by then, as we try to stay in League One? That's a fucking good point actually. Is there a link to this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Just pay up the rest of his contract. . Well, according to the 2017/18 accounts, WE ALREADY FUCKING HAVE!!! Along with Saivet and Lazaar, amongst others. No doubt when the 19/20 accounts get published in 30 months time, everyone will have forgotten, and their wages (which were written off in an extraordinary piece of accounting chicanery) will quietly be added back onto the wage bill, and who would ask by then, as we try to stay in League One? That's a fucking good point actually. Is there a link to this? was part of the £30m they wrote off for erroneous contracts or whatever they called them in those accounts, didn't specifically name players iirc but was basically paying up front (in the accounts) the wages of players the club no longer wanted under rafa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Dislike this guy almost as much as Ashley. Certainly pardew heat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. Yes, but it was used as a "that's used against this seasons transfer budget" excuse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. Our recent Championship season we seemed to burn off (like amortisation?) the full costs of loads of deadwood players wages, and it looked horrific. Then it dropped down from first return to PL accounts, as if wages decreased. Is that what your referring to? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Never forget. I never ever want people to forget how much of a cunt this little wotsit is. Wotsit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 We employ steve Bruce and jack colback ffs. Next level trolling Mike, hats off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. Our recent Championship season we seemed to burn off (like amortisation?) the full costs of loads of deadwood players wages, and it looked horrific. Then it dropped down from first return to PL accounts, as if wages decreased. Is that what your referring to? It was widely belived that Mitrovic and Mbemba's wages were in that figure. Bet those fuckers don't get added back in either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 https://forest.vitalfootball.co.uk/come-home-love-him-these-forest-fans-pine-over-former-player-as-he-appears-for-old-club/ If fans had any say in football.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 https://forest.vitalfootball.co.uk/come-home-love-him-these-forest-fans-pine-over-former-player-as-he-appears-for-old-club/ If fans had any say in football.... What is fucking wrong with them? I'm not having it that he was that good for them, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 They’ve changed manager since last season so it’s fair to assume the new bloke whose name I can’t remember would want him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. So their wages won't appear in the future accounts? What happens with players whose wages were put into that charge who subsequently left before the end of their contract? Will that show up as being repaid? The whole thing seems bloody stupid if i'm honest, what's the point? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 Have the triads in Shanghai seen to this little shitcunt yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 What that charge did was effectively say 'we're committed to paying these guys, but they are of no use to us'. In those cases you have to record the future cost in the current year's income statement, but that doesn't impact the contracted cash flows, that is still paid out as per the contract. So in future years the cost will not be shown on the 'wage bill' per the P&L - that's why our wages / turnover ratio last year looked lower than it probably was in cash terms. The cost had already been recorded but the cash still has to be paid. So their wages won't appear in the future accounts? What happens with players whose wages were put into that charge who subsequently left before the end of their contract? Will that show up as being repaid? The whole thing seems bloody stupid if i'm honest, what's the point? If we don't pay the cash then yes you are correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pons Alias Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 This knacker is In “Lollo Rosso” in Morpeth with Darlow and Voldemort tonight https://www.themag.co.uk/2019/07/newcastle-united-players-involved-in-early-hours-street-fight-before-trip-to-china-the-mail/ Shelvey loves it up here with the peasants, does he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now