Danh1 Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Probably back to Wonga. The most ladgeful shirt sponsor going. We cannot have anything nice or classy under Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 It'll be something like Fray Bentos or Lurpak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 If we get a takeover Fun88 wound be binned anyway so don’t see what the fuss is about. I’d expect big car manufacturers to start advertising more prominently now that electric seems to be on the verge of being mainstream? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 On one hand this is good news because gambling is bad on the other hand this seems to favour “the big 6” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Very happy to see gambling sponsors binned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 If it's being banned from shirts then it should be banned from being advertised on TV match broadcasts entirely. And that's before you start looking at the SkySports / Sky bet issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 (edited) £10 on Frasers Group, any takers? Edited September 22, 2021 by HawK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Just now, HawK said: £10 on Frasers Group, any takers? Is that how much they'll be paying? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted September 22, 2021 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Don't be daft, the net will be closer to -£25m as usual Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 (edited) Crypto firms will just take the place of gambling firms. Edited September 23, 2021 by Sima Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 Greggs...has to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed210 Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 It will be aramco or some other branch of the PIF for about a billion million dollar a year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 It will be some turd low life betting company. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 Could see some blatant Ashley, and just go full on "Sports Direct".....0 up front, and 1p per year for the rest of eternity Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 1 hour ago, gjohnson said: Could see some blatant Ashley, and just go full on "Sports Direct".....0 up front, and 1p per year for the rest of eternity I've never understood why Ashley didn't milk SD for NUFCs benefit. He owns 50% of SD and 100% of the club. Why not get SD pay out of the nose for advertising pumping daft money in to the club. SD has become a monster during its time with us. You could easily suggest we've raised their profile and it's money well spent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 1 hour ago, Dokko said: I've never understood why Ashley didn't milk SD for NUFCs benefit. He owns 50% of SD and 100% of the club. Why not get SD pay out of the nose for advertising pumping daft money in to the club. SD has become a monster during its time with us. You could easily suggest we've raised their profile and it's money well spent. Why pay for advertising when it's free all over the stadium. Plus if SD appeared on the shirts attention would be drawn to how much was paid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 3 minutes ago, gjohnson said: Why pay for advertising when it's free all over the stadium. Plus if SD appeared on the shirts attention would be drawn to how much was paid Free SD advertising is only 50% beneficial to MA whereas SD paying is 100% as it's all his. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bintang Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 (edited) NUFC are the equivalent of Sports Direct. SD offer cheapo products at a low price. That is what Ashley has made NUFC into. We are the cheap version of a premier league club. Spend low on players, sell anyone good on for a profit, survive for the TV money. Running it as a business he has made his model and is doing it very well. Just like this sponsorship he is a gambler. He gambled on us and is maximizing his profits. For us, supporters, it is horrendous, but in his view he has a premier league club with TV money and sponsorship potential. All he needs to do is hire an average manager(not a good manager, we have already seen that a good manager with ambition will not get along with Ashley), a few half decent players and he gets 50,000 people turning up every other week and buying merchandise, food, drink, also a sponsorship deal every year. He has a cash cow and will continue to milk it. Too many of our fans confuse turning up on a match day and cheering the team on with loyalty. Blindly following this shit into the abyss is not being a loyal supporter. It takes a lot more to not go and miss out on the days out with your mates in town or the away trips. Edited September 23, 2021 by Bintang Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 3 hours ago, Dokko said: I've never understood why Ashley didn't milk SD for NUFCs benefit. He owns 50% of SD and 100% of the club. Why not get SD pay out of the nose for advertising pumping daft money in to the club. SD has become a monster during its time with us. You could easily suggest we've raised their profile and it's money well spent. Alternatively, you could say they've raised our profile, not that it's done much good. SD is a multi billion pound business so like it or not dwarfs NUFC in terms of value and income to Ashley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted September 23, 2021 Share Posted September 23, 2021 2 hours ago, Dokko said: Free SD advertising is only 50% beneficial to MA whereas SD paying is 100% as it's all his. Wouldn't he have to pay tax on the income for NUFC from SD? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 On 23/09/2021 at 06:08, Sima said: Crypto firms will just take the place of gambling firms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now