Mole_Toonfan Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Stahp. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 There isn't really a conscious decision to 'replace' anyone, because that notion services the idea that the players are signed with the primary focus of playing football for NUFC. That isn't the case and we know that; we know why they're really here: to generate income. Every player is an expendable asset and we fill the roster up as and when we need to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 You think this thread can't get any worse, then it does so good coming back in here these days, i just don't care anymore see he's signed sanogo on loan, is he a big useless lump of shit to fill the shola-shaped hole in alan's life? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 There isn't really a conscious decision to 'replace' anyone, because that notion services the idea that the players are signed with the primary focus of playing football for NUFC. That isn't the case and we know that; we know why they're really here: to generate income. Every player is an expendable asset and we fill the roster up as and when we need to. Yep Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Liverpool have sold one key player but the premise is the same in that they only sold one player but it was their best player and heartbeat of the side, both excuses that Pardew used. It's a myth that we haven't signed players, numbers wise that's been proved in this very thread. Ultimately, if he had any shred of contempt about the transfer sitauation then he would have said it in public. He's a negative, bullshitting cunt who preaches prehistoric football that's generally just about good enough to stay in the division. If that can be called good or positive by some then so be it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackyboy Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 I really miss him already, great manager just misunderstood Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Cabaye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 After Jose Enrique. Makes sense. The buffoon is incapable of identifying his own targets, still using our scouting system to do the work for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Liverpool have sold one key player but the premise is the same in that they only sold one player but it was their best player and heartbeat of the side, both excuses that Pardew used. It's a myth that we haven't signed players, numbers wise that's been proved in this very thread. Ultimately, if he had any shred of contempt about the transfer sitauation then he would have said it in public. He's a negative, bullshitting c*** who preaches prehistoric football that's generally just about good enough to stay in the division. If that can be called good or positive by some then so be it. They're 5 places down from last season. Their a crap example. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 They're Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 They're Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gino14 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What I'm seeing in this thread are just more reasons that Pardew is an absolute stain on the history of this Football club. He's talked us down in the media so much that everyone believes he has had nothing to work with. You'd believe from the media he has no players, we don't replace anyone and we lack the squad to achieve even a mid table finish. That couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that we don't replace people quickly enough and we are relatively tight with our money considering the wealth of the owner. However, in relation to our sales and the way we operate, we're still a good club to manage in comparison with a lot of clubs that get lauded at the moment. Everyone is busy praising Swansea, but they sell Bony without a second thought. Yes they have Gomis already, but he won't replace Bony adequately in the end. They appointed a no experience coach from within as well. Monk has done alright, but that wasn't a sure thing. If they go out and spend all that 28m I'll stand corrected, but they're on a standard self sufficient business model as well. Not a better club to manage than Newcastle, yet have attracted good managers for years. They have more ambition than us relative to wealth but not more overall ambition. The same can be said for Southampton. They sell half their team, get tipped for relegation and yet attract Koeman. They've spent to replace, but considering they got about 100m in and spent about 40m, it doesn't scream mass ambition. They've perhaps got their scouting right, or been a bit fortunate and have had a lot of the new players do well. Those players will be sold in a heart beat again though should a big club come in. Again, more ambitious than us relative to wealth, but really with a main ambition of trying to do okay relative to their means. There's a lot of faults with the club like the cup policy and the Europa policy. In terms of squad, what we're likely to achieve with a good coach and everything else though, we're not actually a bad prospect to take on and manage, especially with the attraction of a good size club in the premier league. There's a talented squad here with potential and we shouldn't be struggling and playing awful Pardew style Football. There's a real chance for a good coach to do something here and make a name. Pardew has literally persuaded people that because we've had the likes of him, it's the best we can do, whereas people see Swansea and Southampton as attractive because they try and get good managers in consistently. The only thing Pardew is a master of is negativity and draining a club of its very life force. Our owner is a dick like a lot of owners, but we're still a good job if we just try for a good manager. Pardew has talked us down so his mates in the media lap it up. If you listen to them you'd believe we're a much worse job than many in the league. It simply isn't the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunning_Linguist Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 To be honest, I don't know why this thread isn't just locked and we forget about this cupid stunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What I'm seeing in this thread are just more reasons that Pardew is an absolute stain on the history of this Football club. He's talked us down in the media so much that everyone believes he has had nothing to work with. You'd believe from the media he has no players, we don't replace anyone and we lack the squad to achieve even a mid table finish. That couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that we don't replace people quickly enough and we are relatively tight with our money considering the wealth of the owner. However, in relation to our sales and the way we operate, we're still a good club to manage in comparison with a lot of clubs that get lauded at the moment. Everyone is busy praising Swansea, but they sell Bony without a second thought. Yes they have Gomis already, but he won't replace Bony adequately in the end. They appointed a no experience coach from within as well. Monk has done alright, but that wasn't a sure thing. If they go out and spend all that 28m I'll stand corrected, but they're on a standard self sufficient business model as well. Not a better club to manage than Newcastle, yet have attracted good managers for years. They have more ambition than us relative to wealth but not more overall ambition. The same can be said for Southampton. They sell half their team, get tipped for relegation and yet attract Koeman. They've spent to replace, but considering they got about 100m in and spent about 40m, it doesn't scream mass ambition. They've perhaps got their scouting right, or been a bit fortunate and have had a lot of the new players do well. Those players will be sold in a heart beat again though should a big club come in. Again, more ambitious than us relative to wealth, but really with a main ambition of trying to do okay relative to their means. There's a lot of faults with the club like the cup policy and the Europa policy. In terms of squad, what we're likely to achieve with a good coach and everything else though, we're not actually a bad prospect to take on and manage, especially with the attraction of a good size club in the premier league. There's a talented squad here with potential and we shouldn't be struggling and playing awful Pardew style Football. There's a real chance for a good coach to do something here and make a name. Pardew has literally persuaded people that because we've had the likes of him, it's the best we can do, whereas people see Swansea and Southampton as attractive because they try and get good managers in consistently. The only thing Pardew is a master of is negativity and draining a club of its very life force. Our owner is a dick like a lot of owners, but we're still a good job if we just try for a good manager. Pardew has talked us down so his mates in the media lap it up. If you listen to them you'd believe we're a much worse job than many in the league. It simply isn't the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozy Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What I'm seeing in this thread are just more reasons that Pardew is an absolute stain on the history of this Football club. He's talked us down in the media so much that everyone believes he has had nothing to work with. You'd believe from the media he has no players, we don't replace anyone and we lack the squad to achieve even a mid table finish. That couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that we don't replace people quickly enough and we are relatively tight with our money considering the wealth of the owner. However, in relation to our sales and the way we operate, we're still a good club to manage in comparison with a lot of clubs that get lauded at the moment. Everyone is busy praising Swansea, but they sell Bony without a second thought. Yes they have Gomis already, but he won't replace Bony adequately in the end. They appointed a no experience coach from within as well. Monk has done alright, but that wasn't a sure thing. If they go out and spend all that 28m I'll stand corrected, but they're on a standard self sufficient business model as well. Not a better club to manage than Newcastle, yet have attracted good managers for years. They have more ambition than us relative to wealth but not more overall ambition. The same can be said for Southampton. They sell half their team, get tipped for relegation and yet attract Koeman. They've spent to replace, but considering they got about 100m in and spent about 40m, it doesn't scream mass ambition. They've perhaps got their scouting right, or been a bit fortunate and have had a lot of the new players do well. Those players will be sold in a heart beat again though should a big club come in. Again, more ambitious than us relative to wealth, but really with a main ambition of trying to do okay relative to their means. There's a lot of faults with the club like the cup policy and the Europa policy. In terms of squad, what we're likely to achieve with a good coach and everything else though, we're not actually a bad prospect to take on and manage, especially with the attraction of a good size club in the premier league. There's a talented squad here with potential and we shouldn't be struggling and playing awful Pardew style Football. There's a real chance for a good coach to do something here and make a name. Pardew has literally persuaded people that because we've had the likes of him, it's the best we can do, whereas people see Swansea and Southampton as attractive because they try and get good managers in consistently. The only thing Pardew is a master of is negativity and draining a club of its very life force. Our owner is a dick like a lot of owners, but we're still a good job if we just try for a good manager. Pardew has talked us down so his mates in the media lap it up. If you listen to them you'd believe we're a much worse job than many in the league. It simply isn't the case. Yep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What I'm seeing in this thread are just more reasons that Pardew is an absolute stain on the history of this Football club. He's talked us down in the media so much that everyone believes he has had nothing to work with. You'd believe from the media he has no players, we don't replace anyone and we lack the squad to achieve even a mid table finish. That couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that we don't replace people quickly enough and we are relatively tight with our money considering the wealth of the owner. However, in relation to our sales and the way we operate, we're still a good club to manage in comparison with a lot of clubs that get lauded at the moment. Everyone is busy praising Swansea, but they sell Bony without a second thought. Yes they have Gomis already, but he won't replace Bony adequately in the end. They appointed a no experience coach from within as well. Monk has done alright, but that wasn't a sure thing. If they go out and spend all that 28m I'll stand corrected, but they're on a standard self sufficient business model as well. Not a better club to manage than Newcastle, yet have attracted good managers for years. They have more ambition than us relative to wealth but not more overall ambition. The same can be said for Southampton. They sell half their team, get tipped for relegation and yet attract Koeman. They've spent to replace, but considering they got about 100m in and spent about 40m, it doesn't scream mass ambition. They've perhaps got their scouting right, or been a bit fortunate and have had a lot of the new players do well. Those players will be sold in a heart beat again though should a big club come in. Again, more ambitious than us relative to wealth, but really with a main ambition of trying to do okay relative to their means. There's a lot of faults with the club like the cup policy and the Europa policy. In terms of squad, what we're likely to achieve with a good coach and everything else though, we're not actually a bad prospect to take on and manage, especially with the attraction of a good size club in the premier league. There's a talented squad here with potential and we shouldn't be struggling and playing awful Pardew style Football. There's a real chance for a good coach to do something here and make a name. Pardew has literally persuaded people that because we've had the likes of him, it's the best we can do, whereas people see Swansea and Southampton as attractive because they try and get good managers in consistently. The only thing Pardew is a master of is negativity and draining a club of its very life force. Our owner is a dick like a lot of owners, but we're still a good job if we just try for a good manager. Pardew has talked us down so his mates in the media lap it up. If you listen to them you'd believe we're a much worse job than many in the league. It simply isn't the case. (Why you got my vote in the recent awards) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gino14 Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 (Why you got my vote in the recent awards) Thanks . I just had to go and look at the results. I didn't even realise I'd been on that poll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndegwa Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What I'm seeing in this thread are just more reasons that Pardew is an absolute stain on the history of this Football club. He's talked us down in the media so much that everyone believes he has had nothing to work with. You'd believe from the media he has no players, we don't replace anyone and we lack the squad to achieve even a mid table finish. That couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that we don't replace people quickly enough and we are relatively tight with our money considering the wealth of the owner. However, in relation to our sales and the way we operate, we're still a good club to manage in comparison with a lot of clubs that get lauded at the moment. Everyone is busy praising Swansea, but they sell Bony without a second thought. Yes they have Gomis already, but he won't replace Bony adequately in the end. They appointed a no experience coach from within as well. Monk has done alright, but that wasn't a sure thing. If they go out and spend all that 28m I'll stand corrected, but they're on a standard self sufficient business model as well. Not a better club to manage than Newcastle, yet have attracted good managers for years. They have more ambition than us relative to wealth but not more overall ambition. The same can be said for Southampton. They sell half their team, get tipped for relegation and yet attract Koeman. They've spent to replace, but considering they got about 100m in and spent about 40m, it doesn't scream mass ambition. They've perhaps got their scouting right, or been a bit fortunate and have had a lot of the new players do well. Those players will be sold in a heart beat again though should a big club come in. Again, more ambitious than us relative to wealth, but really with a main ambition of trying to do okay relative to their means. There's a lot of faults with the club like the cup policy and the Europa policy. In terms of squad, what we're likely to achieve with a good coach and everything else though, we're not actually a bad prospect to take on and manage, especially with the attraction of a good size club in the premier league. There's a talented squad here with potential and we shouldn't be struggling and playing awful Pardew style Football. There's a real chance for a good coach to do something here and make a name. Pardew has literally persuaded people that because we've had the likes of him, it's the best we can do, whereas people see Swansea and Southampton as attractive because they try and get good managers in consistently. The only thing Pardew is a master of is negativity and draining a club of its very life force. Our owner is a dick like a lot of owners, but we're still a good job if we just try for a good manager. Pardew has talked us down so his mates in the media lap it up. If you listen to them you'd believe we're a much worse job than many in the league. It simply isn't the case. Awesome post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 @CPFC: AP on Sanogo: "Strikers in the PL don't always have to contribute goals. He offers a chaos factor - you're not sure what he's going to do." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 @CPFC: AP on Sanogo: "Strikers in the PL don't always have to contribute goals. He offers a chaos factor - you're not sure what he's going to do." Sounds ideal for the manager who also has no idea what to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 "The most important thing is that he's huge so we can lump balls up to him with some degree of confidence that it will stick" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 They do if you're in the relegation zone ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 @CPFC: AP on Sanogo: "Strikers in the PL don't always have to contribute goals. He offers a chaos factor - you're not sure what he's going to do." Should have signed shola then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc4eva Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 They do if you're in the relegation zone ffs Chaos factor is a new one he's such a cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Chaos factor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts