Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Didn't help him that McClaren blatantly picked the wrong striker just cos he's got a new contract

Or maybe because the other one never scores

I hope you're not indicating that Perez was chosen because he's a goalscorer.

 

Neither of them will get 10 goals and that, along with being unable to keep clean sheets is why we will go down.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something had to change, it didn't work, we would have lost anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't help him that McClaren blatantly picked the wrong striker just cos he's got a new contract

Or maybe because the other one never scores

I hope you're not indicating that Perez was chosen because he's a goalscorer.

 

Neither of them will get 10 goals and that, along with being unable to keep clean sheets is why we will go down.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something had to change, it didn't work, we would have lost anyway

Its not the same thing though when we were giving our new winger, who was apparently brought in to supply our 6ft4 striker with crosses, his debut and we ultimately drop the striker from the gameplan.

 

Not to mention that Perez isn't a striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the last two second halves, away at Watford and last night at Everton, Wijnaldum completed a grand total of 18 passes, only 4 of which were forward passes in the opposition's half.

 

In the second half of the West Ham match alone, he completed 28 passes, 8 of which were forward passes in the opposition half.

 

Very worrying.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not really a number 10 IMO. More of a second striker if anything. He needs to play off of a front man that holds the ball up and links play.

 

He will not look to drop into spaces get on the ball and influence things at all. With Ayoze up front alone we needed a number 10 that played that way, and he doesn't, and it was a huge issue yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think Unbelievable said when he was in his best form that he was surprised he was playing so well and that he didn't think he'd keep it up. At the time we probably didn't want to believe it but it looks like he was probably correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't help him that McClaren blatantly picked the wrong striker just cos he's got a new contract

Or maybe because the other one never scores

I hope you're not indicating that Perez was chosen because he's a goalscorer.

 

Neither of them will get 10 goals and that, along with being unable to keep clean sheets is why we will go down.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something had to change, it didn't work, we would have lost anyway

Its not the same thing though when we were giving our new winger, who was apparently brought in to supply our 6ft4 striker with crosses, his debut and we ultimately drop the striker from the gameplan.

 

Not to mention that Perez isn't a striker.

Townsend has always been a cut in and shoot type player rather than a get down the line and cross hasn't he though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't help him that McClaren blatantly picked the wrong striker just cos he's got a new contract

Or maybe because the other one never scores

I hope you're not indicating that Perez was chosen because he's a goalscorer.

 

Neither of them will get 10 goals and that, along with being unable to keep clean sheets is why we will go down.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something had to change, it didn't work, we would have lost anyway

Its not the same thing though when we were giving our new winger, who was apparently brought in to supply our 6ft4 striker with crosses, his debut and we ultimately drop the striker from the gameplan.

 

Not to mention that Perez isn't a striker.

Townsend has always been a cut in and shoot type player rather than a get down the line and cross hasn't he though?

He has been when he's played RM but thats why we've apparently put him on the left, so he can get crosses in for Mitro.

 

Mind you, it is the local media who reported that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He struggles badly away from home because of the way we set up and the areas of the pitch we usually gain possession (deep in our own half). We either have to change tactics or we may as well not play him in away games. We were set up to fail last night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

He's been shite away, yes, but the way we set up uninterested in attacking and just booting it lot to Mitro isn't exactly helping his cause. The games he's been OK in away have unsurprisingly been the rare ones when we've looked to move the ball through the middle along the floor at a pacer quicker than 0.

 

It's a tough one to drop him as he's one of the few players we have who can score but at the same time it might be the kick up the arse he needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can use the setup as an excuse at this stage. He's not been good enough and, at this stage of the season, there really are no excuses for his inability to influence our away performances.

 

Sometimes, the player just has to look at themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can use the setup as an excuse at this stage. He's not been good enough and, at this stage of the season, there really are no excuses for his inability to influence our away performances.

 

Sometimes, the player just has to look at themselves.

 

I guess what I'm saying is that if you bring someone else in playing the same system I wouldn't fancy them to do much either. But yes, he should be doing more. If even just from a defensive and harrying POV rather than anything positive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can use the setup as an excuse at this stage. He's not been good enough and, at this stage of the season, there really are no excuses for his inability to influence our away performances.

 

Sometimes, the player just has to look at themselves.

 

I guess what I'm saying is that if you bring someone else in playing the same system I wouldn't fancy them to do much either. But yes, he should be doing more. If even just from a defensive and harrying POV rather than anything positive.

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you can use the setup as an excuse at this stage. He's not been good enough and, at this stage of the season, there really are no excuses for his inability to influence our away performances.

 

Sometimes, the player just has to look at themselves.

 

I guess what I'm saying is that if you bring someone else in playing the same system I wouldn't fancy them to do much either. But yes, he should be doing more. If even just from a defensive and harrying POV rather than anything positive.

 

:thup: Agree with that mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never known a player to be so good yet have so little involvement. Not even sure McClaren is to blame on this one. He's played LM, LW, AM, CM...far too often he just goes missing in games in any position he's put. Like he's actively trying to not be involved. Very strange. Deserved hooked today but for Perez or Doumbia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never known a player to be so good yet have so little involvement. Not even sure McClaren is to blame on this one. He's played LM, LW, AM, CM...far too often he just goes missing in games in any position he's put. Like he's actively trying to not be involved. Very strange. Deserved hooked today but for Perez or Doumbia.

 

Aye, to bring Colback on for Gini was a gutless a change as you could get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...