Jump to content

Jonjo Shelvey (now playing for Burnley)


Recommended Posts

Guest neesy111

He hasn't been a good signing at all, needs loads of time and space when attacking and it's like he's not there when we're defending. Maybe he can improve but I would be playing him at the moment.

 

It's going to take a huge change in attitude for him to become someone dependable in the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't agree with dropping him but it worked for team shape. He could be a really good player, I have hope he can be a good all-rounder under Rafa.

 

He'll ah

 

Can't blame him for that, everybody likes a good ah now and again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's more of a number 10,just add him to the list of number 10s in the squad.

He isn't, his long passing is his best attribute by a mile. He's not agile or skillful enough to be a number 10

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get what he is. He's supposed to be a proficient long range passer (which is questionable imo), so should surely sit deeper...but he looks terrible there. He's not got the guile, agility or intelligence to play in behind a striker. He couldn't play anywhere on the sides due to his lack of athleticism...so what the hell is he? Really don't like him, technically or attitude-wise. English tho

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get what he is. He's supposed to be a proficient long range passer (which is questionable imo), so should surely sit deeper...but he looks terrible there. He's not got the guile, agility or intelligence to play in behind a striker. He couldn't play anywhere on the sides due to his lack of athleticism...so what the hell is he? Really don't like him, technically or attitude-wise. English tho

 

If we had a couple of engines in front of him, he would be fine imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he was playing in a team that was usually better than the opposition, he'd be fine because he'd have a bit more time and space in which to operate. In a team that's struggling, his lack of mobility and pace gets exposed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get what he is. He's supposed to be a proficient long range passer (which is questionable imo), so should surely sit deeper...but he looks terrible there. He's not got the guile, agility or intelligence to play in behind a striker. He couldn't play anywhere on the sides due to his lack of athleticism...so what the hell is he? Really don't like him, technically or attitude-wise. English tho

 

He can pick a good pass, of that there shouldn't be much doubt, there's been some beauties even in his short time here. The question should be, is the odd Hollywood pass more effective over 90 mins than a succession of quick short passes? If you compare with Leicester this season then you'd have to say no. The basics of hard work and team ethic come first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

He needs a free role because he's not disciplined enough to hold down a set position (a bit like Gerrard really)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: spot on Joey.

 

Ramsey is pretty mobile, is well suited to playing in the best passing team in the league, he can operate out wide, he can play behind the striker or as a centre mid.  I would say comparing him to Charlie Adam and Jonjo Shelvey, is a bit of an odd one? 

 

As for Shelvey.  I think Cronky is spot on with his assessment.  In a team that can control possession and dominate games.  I think he'd actually be a very good player.  For a team like us, that do neither of those things.  He's pretty ineffective and is actually a bit of a hindrance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know why everyone keeps banging on about him being a luxury player, have you seen the points he does? The ones where he points at a player telling a player to pick the man up despite the fact that either 1) he's closer or 2) he's making no effort to close down the player closest to him with the ball. f***ing brilliant, man. Just what we need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ramsey is mobile but he has zero positional discipline.  He leaves massive gaps in CM with his forward runs.  Without the ball unless he's charging around putting in tackles he's useless.  Often that charging leaves gaps to be exploited. 

 

To me that's the Gerrard legacy on British football. 'Central midfielders ' largely incapable of playing in a midfield 2 against players of similar ability because of ill-discipline off the ball and sometimes on it.  Lots of running and slide tackles masking the fact they leave the team vulnerable. In a midfield 2 - a tactical liability.  Perfectly fine in a midfield 3 btw. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TCD man! Fucking relentless  :lol: Can't remember the last time Aaron bloody Ramsey was flying into tackles

 

Don't know why everyone keeps banging on about him being a luxury player, have you seen the points he does? The ones where he points at a player telling a player to pick the man up despite the fact that either 1) he's closer or 2) he's making no effort to close down the player closest to him with the ball. f***ing brilliant, man. Just what we need.

 

:thup:

 

A luxury player would also sort of mean that he has a specific ability that, in the right environment, is mercurial, special, useful or at least commendable. He doesn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...