Guest neesy111 Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 The RSPCC have complained to the FA doubt there will be any punishment for the club, but there should be. Do you mean the NSPCC or the RSPCA? Could be either. Both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 The RSPCC have complained to the FA doubt there will be any punishment for the club, but there should be. Do you mean the NSPCC or the RSPCA? Could be either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
summerof69 Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Wasn't Johnson signed by O'Neil ? Who just happened to choose Roy Keane as his assistant manager for Republic of Ireland....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Well my very restrained replies correcting people on the facts of the case or things like ages of consent in different countries on his sister's Facebook support page have been deleted. Anything calling the victim a slag is still there though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 King of Rocking Roll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Can the lass and her family not press charges against his sister? Surely you're not allowed to promote the harassment of victims of sexual abuse. Or is it just one them things? I assume they just want it to all fuck off like without going through court again either way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 If it was a Newcastle player who had done the same as Johnson, they would be calling for him to be given the electric chair Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'. Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Imagine being in prison and all of your wealth and fame count for absolutely fuck all while your daughter grows up and you miss it all. Excellent, hope the jumped up little twat rots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Kudos for revelling in a girl growing up without a father. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'. Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson This is exactly the point. You know what you're doing from a very young age, the law is there because nigh on everyone looks back and thinks 'what was I doing?' with a lot of things from being that age, not least something that serious. Their opinions on it completely correlate with how much they know about it and how much they know in general. The perfect mix of arrogance and ignorance, we're living in an idiocracy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Publicly calling her a slag and promoting contradictions the court could have them sued for libel defamation. But that's an expensive process as the victim has to prove, not them disproving. From what I understand it's quite the opposite. If someone writes something potentially defamatory the burden of proof in court would be on them to demonstrate that what they wrote is true, not the other way around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'. Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson This is exactly the point. You know what you're doing from a very young age, the law is there because nigh on everyone looks back and thinks 'what was I doing?' with a lot of things from being that age, not least something that serious. Their opinions on it completely correlate with how much they know about it and how much they know in general. The perfect mix of arrogance and ignorance, we're living in an idiocracy. And layer on top of that the imbalance in the power dynamic as the age between the perpetrator and victim increases. It's ludicrous to condemn a 15 year old for not being more effective in repelling the advances of a 28 year old who has specifically targeted her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 "She knew what she was doing" Aye definitely, that's why she tried to kill herself a few weeks ago. Had it all planned out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 "She knew what she was doing" Aye definitely, that's why she tried to kill herself a few weeks ago. Had it all planned out. even at its highest that logic is essentially it's ok to sexually exploit children. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pons Alias Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Kudos for revelling in a girl growing up without a father. Given the amount of Dog/Kiddie Fucker jokes she is likely to get, I imagine she'll change her name and deny him. Good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 Got to say if I was him I wouldn't want to come out. He's been outed as a paedophile, someone who likes sex with animals, dogs in particular, a groomer, a nonce and also a retard. I'd just tell them to throw away the key because I couldn't take the shame if I were him. No wonder the mackems love him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 He will have a comfortable life waiting for him when he gets out. The lass will probably need therapy for a long time, possibly need to change her name and move away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 At this point, given all that we know, we can only assume that anyone calling some poor young schoolgirl a slag whilst brushing Johnson's acts off as idiocy is a massive paedophile and should be charged as such. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 The idea a 28 year old grown fucking man has been exploited and reeled in by a cunning 15 year old lass is absolutely ridiculous, and it's part of a long standing problem of stereotyping both abusers and victims. We had this with perpetrators back in the 80s, the stereotype of the paedophile was some loner weirdo with pebbly glasses lurking in the park. "Stranger danger". That's what allowed people like Jimmy Savile get away with it, because charismatic famous people weren't child abusers. Everyone knew Jimmy, he was the opposite of the scary stranger That's why uncles and parents managed to abuse kids for so long, even though most kids are abused by family members. Ian Watkins is the antithesis of the scary paedo, a young, attractive and talented rock star. We've done the same with victims, victims of paedophiles are blue eyed kids playing on the swings while their parents have turned their back for a second and some guy in a flasher mac snatches them. We saw it with Rotherham, police didn't care about young teenage girls being repeatedly returned to their abusers because they were smoking, spitting, swearing and drinking. They were acting older, but it's chicken and egg. They've grown up too fast because of the conditions they found themselves in, and adults who want to exploit them see them as an easy target for abuse because people won't take it seriously as they're "bad kids", who have an attitude and might have already slept with kids their own age. That's why it's so poisonous for people to be talking about what this *child* was 'like' and how it absolves Johnson of blame. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 The idea a 28 year old grown fucking man has been exploited and reeled in by a cunning 15 year old lass is absolutely ridiculous, and it's part of a long standing problem of stereotyping both abusers and victims. We had this with perpetrators back in the 80s, the stereotype of the paedophile was some loner weirdo with pebbly glasses lurking in the park. "Stranger danger". That's what allowed people like Jimmy Savile get away with it, because charismatic famous people weren't child abusers. Everyone knew Jimmy, he was the opposite of the scary stranger That's why uncles and parents managed to abuse kids for so long, even though most kids are abused by family members. Ian Watkins is the antithesis of the scary paedo, a young, attractive and talented rock star. We've done the same with victims, victims of paedophiles are blue eyed kids playing on the swings while their parents have turned their back for a second and some guy in a flasher mac snatches them. We saw it with Rotherham, police didn't care about young teenage girls being repeatedly returned to their abusers because they were smoking, spitting, swearing and drinking. They were acting older, but it's chicken and egg. They've grown up too fast because of the conditions they found themselves in, ans adults who want to exploit them see them as an easy target for abuse because people won't take it seriously as they're "bad kids", who have an attitude and might have already slept with kids their own age. That's why it's so poisonous for people to be talking about what this *child* was like and how it absolves Johnson of blame. I cannot get over it Of all the widespread ludicrous opinions I've seen on social media this is by far the most bizarre. People are actually defending a paedophile at the expense of his victim, I've never heard anything like it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 The 'Facebook intellects' have had a field day over this like, just ignore them. No point in trying to change their minds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newsted Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 I think he's irredeemable but SAFC should have a cleanout of anyone who facilitated this, which must have been more than one person. Are you taking the piss? SAFC, along with the vast majority of the cretins they call a fanbase have already deleted the whole incident from their history. I read yesterday "why do they keep saying ex sunderland player when he played for city, boro etc?" Here's why. You knew. You all knew, and you all kept him in the first eleven to save your PL status, you all chanted his name like a hero, you all danced like gibbons when he scored in the 90th minute and you all hounded a child on social media to the point of suicide. sunderland and their fascist defending, nonce loving, backwards racist sh*tstain fans are a disgrace to the game. But yeah, I punched a horse that time so equals pequals... Hang on, do you think I'm a mackem? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicane Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 I thought the title was some sort of joke I didn't get but jfc it's actually a thing What a fucking freak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted March 25, 2016 Share Posted March 25, 2016 I think he's irredeemable but SAFC should have a cleanout of anyone who facilitated this, which must have been more than one person. Are you taking the p*ss? SAFC, along with the vast majority of the cretins they call a fanbase have already deleted the whole incident from their history. I read yesterday "why do they keep saying ex sunderland player when he played for city, boro etc?" Here's why. You knew. You all knew, and you all kept him in the first eleven to save your PL status, you all chanted his name like a hero, you all danced like gibbons when he scored in the 90th minute and you all hounded a child on social media to the point of suicide. sunderland and their fascist defending, nonce loving, backwards racist sh*tstain fans are a disgrace to the game. But yeah, I punched a horse that time so equals pequals... Hang on, do you think I'm a mackem? Heh, it was more a public service broadcast to the mackem nashun.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts