bowlingcrofty Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-plot-transfer-swoop-chelsea-10478424 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-plot-transfer-swoop-chelsea-10478424 Loan is more realistic for sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Reckon those late-season goals will make him think he can get in their side tbh, particularly if there's still uncertainty over the future of Diego Costa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Day Gadgie Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Can't see us having any chance of signing Batshuayi on loan until the Diego Costa situation is sorted out at Chelsea. Big money involved so it could drag on all summer, i wouldn't want us be waiting until to end of the window to get a striker in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-plot-transfer-swoop-chelsea-10478424 We're after five first teamers and five squad players according to that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why would Chelsea let Batsuite go when they have the Champions League added to their fixtures next season, that would be nuts unless they intend to buy another striker, which would be nuts as they already have Batfink. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why would Chelsea let Batsuite go when they have the Champions League added to their fixtures next season, that would be nuts unless they intend to buy another striker, which would be nuts as they already have Batfink. Think Lukaku, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why would Chelsea let Batsuite go when they have the Champions League added to their fixtures next season, that would be nuts unless they intend to buy another striker, which would be nuts as they already have Batfink. Of course they will, it's Chelsea we are talking about here. If he stays he'll be exactly in the same position as this year assuming Costa actually leaves. I have no doubt they'll spend big on a striker though, probably Lukaku. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why would Chelsea let Batsuite go when they have the Champions League added to their fixtures next season, that would be nuts unless they intend to buy another striker, which would be nuts as they already have Batfink. Think Lukaku, I was about to go to bed and that's just strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Why would Chelsea let Batsuite go when they have the Champions League added to their fixtures next season, that would be nuts unless they intend to buy another striker, which would be nuts as they already have Batfink. Of course they will, it's Chelsea we are talking about here. If he stays he'll be exactly in the same position as this year assuming Costa actually leaves. I have no doubt they'll spend big on a striker though, probably Lukaku. True it is Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Definitely see Chelsea going back in for Lukaku. Didn't Lukaku say he wants to move back there? Anyway I'd love to see us get the lad in on loan. To me he'd be one of the most positive signings we've made in years. From what I've seen of him he tends to play quite similar to Lukaku. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Still think Lukaku could backfire for a top club. His linkup play is poor and he's very streaky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Still think Lukaku could backfire for a top club. His linkup play is poor and he's very streaky. I actually think he could be the kind of player a team like Arsenal have been looking for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Even when Lukaku goes there to replace Costa, why would Chelsea flog their #2 striker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Even when Lukaku goes there to replace Costa, why would Chelsea flog their #2 striker? They wouldn't flog him, they'll loan him out to develop him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Even when Lukaku goes there to replace Costa, why would Chelsea flog their #2 striker? They wouldn't flog him, they'll loan him out to develop him. So they'll have to buy another striker, or trust Tammy Abraham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Even when Lukaku goes there to replace Costa, why would Chelsea flog their #2 striker? They wouldn't flog him, they'll loan him out to develop him. So they'll have to buy another striker, or trust Tammy Abraham. Quite possible. Not like they can't afford it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stottie Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Can't see us having any chance of signing Batshuayi on loan until the Diego Costa situation is sorted out at Chelsea. Big money involved so it could drag on all summer, i wouldn't want us be waiting until to end of the window to get a striker in. For this plan to work, it might be an idea to first sign a #10 who can also play as a lone striker, Josh King being the name put forward. For the same reason, I like the idea of Cairney since he could play in the two or fill in as AM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddy Chibas Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 On principle I'm against the likes of Chelsea stockpiling Europe & England's top youth talent, only to loan them out to EPL sides (to develop & evaluate them in the top flight). I oppose the system, so it's a No from me ie. Batsuhayai. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Would have kept the little fella: http://www.shieldsgazette.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/vurnon-anita-and-yoan-gouffran-heading-for-summer-exits-at-newcastle-1-8556313 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Still think Lukaku could backfire for a top club. His linkup play is poor and he's very streaky. Agreed. He might develop into Drogba Mk 2, but he's nowhere near that yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Would have kept the little fella: http://www.shieldsgazette.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/vurnon-anita-and-yoan-gouffran-heading-for-summer-exits-at-newcastle-1-8556313 It's the right decision imo. If we're going to develop the club we need to upgrade on players like Gouff and Anita. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Would have kept the little fella: http://www.shieldsgazette.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/vurnon-anita-and-yoan-gouffran-heading-for-summer-exits-at-newcastle-1-8556313 Means we have the funds to go out and improve on them both. I like Anita as well, but this is actually good news Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Would have kept the little fella: http://www.shieldsgazette.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/vurnon-anita-and-yoan-gouffran-heading-for-summer-exits-at-newcastle-1-8556313 Means we have the funds to go out and improve on them both. I like Anita as well, but this is actually good news Doubt Sterry and Yedlin will be enough so no doubt Rafa will be going shopping. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Would have kept Anita - going to cost a fair amount of money to get in a player to replace him when we've got far more important issues to resolve. As others have said, hopefully it means Rafa has a lot of money to spend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts