Wullie Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 That's outrageous like. Sure they can argue it's in the T&Cs but I don't understand how they can get away with putting something so arbitrary in the small print. Why don't they hide away that if a goal doesn't hit the net, it doesn't count? Or if a corner is taken short, it doesn't count? Those make as much sense. You shouldn't have to go reading the small print for something so black and white. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 My my friend is claiming PR stunt . I can't see it though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I've got a Terry Phelan that the in-play offer might be on for Chelsea vs Man Utd on Monday! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 the betvictor statement Yesterday evening, we accepted a small number of bets on a #PriceItUp market, ‘Messi to score a penalty, Cavani to hit the woodwork and Barca to qualify’ at 125/1 in the Barcelona v PSG Champions League match. Customers request this type of tailored bet via Twitter and our Trading and Social Media teams price up the requests and reply to customers. We settled these particular bets as losers, as under our betting rules for #PriceItUp, which are listed on our website, we have the following rule regarding woodwork-related bets: ‘’For any bets involving players hitting the woodwork, the following rule will be applied: “The ball must make contact with the woodwork and come back in play from an attempt on the opponent’s goal during active play. Shots that hit the woodwork on their way into the goal will count.” As Cavani’s shot against the woodwork didn’t rebound back into play, we settled these bets in line with the above rule, which was designed to prevent ambiguity around shots that may or may not have skimmed the woodwork. However, we accept that in this case with #PriceItUp markets, these terms were not made clear within the individual bet, and, as such, have now settled all bets on this selection as winners. All of the customers involved have been individually contacted by us. Moving forward, to avoid any confusion, we will update the relevant rule and publish it ahead of our next #PriceItUp fixture, which is scheduled to be next Monday 13th March for the FA Cup 6th Round clash between Chelsea and Manchester United. We can confirm that any shot that hits any part of the woodwork will count going forward. We apologise for any confusion caused. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Was an absolutely ridiculous clause anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Budgie Smuggler Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 In fairness they've cleared it up there, the rule is in place to avoid ambiguity regarding whether a ball may or may not have skimmed the woodwork on the way out which does make sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Skimmed shouldn't count tbf. Balls must deviate their trajectory by more than 10 degrees to have said to have hit the woodwork. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Skims should count like, it still makes contact with the bar. If there's evidence the ball makes contact with the woodwork then they should pay out. Little ambiguity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Or they should just scrap the stupid market Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Skims should count like, it still makes contact with the bar. If there's evidence the ball makes contact with the woodwork then they should pay out. Little ambiguity. Aye, it's pretty clear that if it touches the bar in any way it should be counted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevo Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Paully I hope you aren't on Ibra FGS or the draws in the darts later because I have just jinxed both of them! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Here's to trying... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Off to a decent start #TemptingFate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
11Tino11 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I've got a Terry Phelan that the in-play offer might be on for Chelsea vs Man Utd on Monday! Doubt it, it's Cheltenham next week so there will be 5 days worth of the 4/1 winner offer instead of just the usual one on the Saturday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Stuck all draws accumulator on in the 20.05 Europa games... needing a Gent comeback and the others to hold. 2-4 at present. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Paully I hope you aren't on Ibra FGS or the draws in the darts later because I have just jinxed both of them! Bastard! Ha ha! The darts bet will never come in again mind! Skybet enhanced Saturday; NUFC Everton Leeds 13/2 £27.50 max! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevo Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Had £2.50 on Lewis, Wright, Anderson all to win and hit most 180s @ 36/1. Fucking Anderson Drew 4-4 on 180s and didn't hit one for about 7 legs after smashing out 4 in the opening couple. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Had all 5 winners in the darts as an acca. Only put 2 quid on though so winnings of 33 quid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Paully I hope you aren't on Ibra FGS or the draws in the darts later because I have just jinxed both of them! Bastard! Ha ha! The darts bet will never come in again mind! Skybet enhanced Saturday; NUFC Everton Leeds 13/2 £27.50 max! hmm, I like that one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Clark to score anytime today is 17/2 with bet365 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Not a fan of this Boro side but 10/1 feels slightly overpriced for the home team in a cup game. Likely to be value in the +2 around evens with their defensive record? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Lincoln 0-1 is 80/1. Worth a quid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Paully I hope you aren't on Ibra FGS or the draws in the darts later because I have just jinxed both of them! Bastard! Ha ha! The darts bet will never come in again mind! Skybet enhanced Saturday; NUFC Everton Leeds 13/2 £27.50 max! hmm, I like that one fuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted March 11, 2017 Share Posted March 11, 2017 Probably my worst ever day of Saturday football betting, every bet was nowhere near. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now