Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest neesy111

Video reffing is going to cause some serious anger when it comes to red cards and penalties. At least offsides are a basically black and white decision.

 

Sanchez looks offside for the last goal as well

 

That is what it should only be used for, or if a foul is inside or outside a box.

 

Agree to a point but what if the replay shows it wasn't a foul?

 

Original decision stands, the referee has given the foul but he's wanting clarification of whether it was inside the box or not.  The whole thing that needs to be sorted out are the rules around it and the process of making a decision.  The referee watching the game needs to be proactive and understanding where they will be called for, for me they seem very bone idle at the moment hence why decisions are taking too long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

DCoRZcKWAAEcvj0.jpg

 

Looks offside to me. Don't think they even looked at it

 

Can't make anything out from that angle since it doesn't cover the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

DCoRZcKWAAEcvj0.jpg

 

 

Looks offside to me. Don't think they even looked at it

Is he not being played on by their left back (out of view)? There's only 3 defenders there.

The LB is the one right in front of him (whoever it is playing the ball) :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

DCoRZcKWAAEcvj0.jpg

 

 

Looks offside to me. Don't think they even looked at it

Is he not being played on by their left back (out of view)? There's only 3 defenders there.

The LB is the one right in front of him (whoever it is playing the ball) :lol:

:lol: aye I've just watched it. So yeah, just an embarrassment all round then. Ref makes the wrong call then the VAR misses an actual offside.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Video reffing is going to cause some serious anger when it comes to red cards and penalties. At least offsides are a basically black and white decision.

 

Sanchez looks offside for the last goal as well

 

That is what it should only be used for, or if a foul is inside or outside a box.

 

Agree to a point but what if the replay shows it wasn't a foul?

 

Original decision stands, the referee has given the foul but he's wanting clarification of whether it was inside the box or not.  The whole thing that needs to be sorted out are the rules around it and the process of making a decision.  The referee watching the game needs to be proactive and understanding where they will be called for, for me they seem very bone idle at the moment hence why decisions are taking too long.

 

But ultimately how will that be satisfactory? If it's not a foul what can he give inside or outside the box and what can the VAR give inside or outside the box?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Video reffing is going to cause some serious anger when it comes to red cards and penalties. At least offsides are a basically black and white decision.

 

Sanchez looks offside for the last goal as well

 

That is what it should only be used for, or if a foul is inside or outside a box.

 

Agree to a point but what if the replay shows it wasn't a foul?

 

Original decision stands, the referee has given the foul but he's wanting clarification of whether it was inside the box or not.  The whole thing that needs to be sorted out are the rules around it and the process of making a decision.  The referee watching the game needs to be proactive and understanding where they will be called for, for me they seem very bone idle at the moment hence why decisions are taking too long.

 

But ultimately how will that be satisfactory? If it's not a foul what can he give inside or outside the box and what can the VAR give inside or outside the box?

 

That's a good point that I hadn't thought of.  Then would a challenge system when a team gets a challenge each be better, teams would only use them for when blatant mistakes have been made and you would only get a few challenges a game so little disruption to the game overall.

 

As usual FIFA have implemented it an absolutely shambolic way.  If you get the process right then imo, decisions should only take a matter of seconds to decide for stuff like offsides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's not a foul but the ref went to VAR, he gave the advantage and opportunity to the attacking team.  If it turns out not to be a foul (or a dive), just give a free kick to the defending team where it incident was imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

If it's not a foul but the ref went to VAR, he gave the advantage and opportunity to the attacking team.  If it turns out not to be a foul (or a dive), just give a free kick to the defending team where it incident was imo

 

Could say it's technically something that might happen where referee gives the foul but linesman then says it was a clear dive and then ref reverses the decision?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who the hell is the right mid for Cameroon, he's fucking rapid.

Bassogog. Noted it earlier, his acceleration is mental. 0-100 instantly :lol:

 

Just had a look at him, see who he plays for etc

 

He was born in 1995 apparently (meaning he was between 19-21 on this pic)

 

http://i.imgur.com/0pDPvPh.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who the hell is the right mid for Cameroon, he's fucking rapid.

Bassogog. Noted it earlier, his acceleration is mental. 0-100 instantly :lol:

 

Just had a look at him, see who he plays for etc

 

He was born in 1995 apparently (meaning he was between 19-21 on this pic)

 

http://i.imgur.com/0pDPvPh.jpg

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not been watching football in the last few days but it sounds like a lot of decisions have gone to review. And that's one of the problems, in cricket the on-field umpires are basically pointless now.

 

Fuck it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not been watching football in the last few days but it sounds like a lot of decisions have gone to review. And that's one of the problems, in cricket the on-field umpires are basically pointless now.

 

f*** it off.

 

That really isn't true about cricket tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aye, the review system in cricket is only to overturn significantly wrong decisions in cricket. Anything that's marginal still goes with the on field umpire. System works well but maybe needs a couple of tweaks like the % of the ball that has to be hitting the stumps for it to be umpires call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...