Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It'll take some getting used to and they'll figure out ways of shortening the process with experience, but I don't see how getting the right decision can in any way be a bad thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's absolute nonsense man.

 

You can't just correct 'game-changing' decisions. Every single action and motion in a football match is potentially gamechanging. If you start correcting 'big' decisions it just creates a new unfairness at the numerous small, cumulative decisions in a game. Each and every one of them that could directly or indirectly lead to a team scoring a goal or winning a game.

 

The whole idea is completely and utterly flawed at a fundamental level due to the flowing nature of the sport. And in enforcing it you force the game to be stopped endlessly contributing to the destruction of the aspect of the game that makes it 10 times more exciting than every other shite sport that nobody watches.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's absolute nonsense man.

 

You can't just correct 'game-changing' decisions. Every single action and motion in a football match is potentially gamechanging. If you start correcting 'big' decisions it just creates a new unfairness at the numerous small, cumulative decisions in a game. Each and every one of them that could directly or indirectly lead to a team losing.

 

The whole idea is completely and utterly flawed at a fundamental level due to the flowing nature of the sport.

 

But Liverpool would be 1-3 down due to a missed offside and missed foul in the box, those aren't small decisions in games, they're the very reasons it's been brought in to stop the unfairness. Totally agree about the flow of the game mind, they need to tune Vars up in that respect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll take some getting used to and they'll figure out ways of shortening the process with experience, but I don't see how getting the right decision can in any way be a bad thing.

change

 

some people cant deal with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

A small foul might lead to a change of possession that 2 minutes later leads to a goal for a team, it won't get reviewed due to the 'small' nature of the foul but it's impact on the game has indirectly led to a goal.

 

Every small incremental thing that happens in football is potentially equally as important as every 'big' thing. There is no hierarchy. You can't just start correcting and tampering with 'big' decisions, because it's a slippery slope to either messing with everything or simply creating new unfairness due to the selective decisions you're reversing.

 

It's fundamentally broken as a concept for this reason. That's before you even get onto time stoppages and the fact that 50% of the reversed decisions remain debatable anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A small foul might lead to a change of possession that 2 minutes later leads to a goal for a team, it won't get reviewed due to the 'small' nature of the foul but it's impact on the game has indirectly led to a goal.

 

Every small incremental thing that happens in football is potentially equally as important as every 'big' thing. There is no hierarchy. You can't just start correcting and tampering with 'big' decisions, because it's a slippery slope to either messing with everything or simply creating new unfairness due to the selective decisions you're reversing.

 

:thup:

 

Goal line technology was a black and white area. This VAR bollocks is very grey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Just make it 1 var for each team in each game that the manager has to signal for as then it'll only be used for stuff that is clear cut wrong imo.  Puts the pressure away from the ref.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...