Away Toon Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 For the level we are at and the lack of ambition from the club he's okay starting for us. Wonder if Rafa will look again at Sels when he comes back, he bought him (presumably) and he's having a good season in France. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 From Hardy; @mhardysport 3m3 minutes ago Martin Dubravka, 2018/19, in numbers: CLEAN SHEETS: 7 (5th highest in Premier League) GOALS CONCEDED: 34 (9th best) SAVES: 77 (6th best) PUNCHES: 10 (8th best) HIGH CLAIMS: 25 (2nd best) SWEEPER CLEARANCES: 12 (6th best) Can’t wait to see David Edgar’s star graphs proving why Darlow is even better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 For the level we are at and the lack of ambition from the club he's okay starting for us. Wonder if Rafa will look again at Sels when he comes back, he bought him (presumably) and he's having a good season in France. What the actual fuck man? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribesman Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Luke Edwards writing an article saying he has gone from our biggest strength to one of our major weaknesses. Just fuck off with that shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 For the level we are at and the lack of ambition from the club he's okay starting for us. Wonder if Rafa will look again at Sels when he comes back, he bought him (presumably) and he's having a good season in France. What the actual fuck man? Sels. That dude was whack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Sels left permanently too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Aye he's made an error or two but he's by far the best GK we've had for a long while. He's not suddenly a crap keeper, stick by him imo, he's mint. Yep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Toon Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Sels left permanently too Didn't realise we had sold Sels, where did the money go? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Bellends Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 I think the headline was sort of intended to mean"give him a break", as in 'lay off the criticism of him', but it hasn't really come across like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 I think the headline was sort of intended to mean"give him a break", as in 'lay off the criticism of him', but it hasn't really come across like that. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/support-martin-dubravka-explaining-chronicle-15824856 The Chronicle try to explain it here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gav24 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 He's still mint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 He's still mint. Aye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 the paper editor who went with that - for whatever reason needs to be reprimanded. that is bull shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 It’s weak. Yeah, you've said. Lots. It's still a foul. It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match. Refereeing decisions can go against you. Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul. In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. Some arms on him. No body. No push. Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 It’s weak. Yeah, you've said. Lots. It's still a foul. It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match. Refereeing decisions can go against you. Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul. In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. Some arms on him. No body. No push. Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo. Your post is fundamentally wrong man. 1) Rafa said the refs don't know the rules in England, implying he felt it was a foul. He even motioned it as such after the match. 2) Dubravka went up with 2 hands to catch and Boly went up and used the face/shoulders of Dubravka to gain leverage to get higher and move his head back and body back. Look at pictures if you didn't already. It wasn't some arms, arms change just as much leverage as anything else, he climbed on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NobbyOhNobby Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 It’s weak. Yeah, you've said. Lots. It's still a foul. It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match. Refereeing decisions can go against you. Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul. In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. Some arms on him. No body. No push. Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo. I'm with you man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 ‘Boly wanted it more’. What a pile of wank. Dubravka was backtracking because of a ridiculously mishit cross that favoured Boly’s starting position. Dubs was almost dead centre of his goal, Boly was running on to it from deep so was always going to have leverage. Throw in the fact he’s clearly fouled him and to say ‘he wanted it more’ is pure bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Rafa said he had hands on his face and that 'they don't know the rules in England'....not sure how that comes across as him not thinking it's a foul, unless hands in the face is allowed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyne81 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 As mentioned by myself and a few others in this thread, the players and Dubravka didn't even call for a foul at the time. You just had Lascelles shouting at him and Dubravka's face told the story afterwards. He knew he fucked up. He will learn from it, we move on chaps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Hands were on his face mate, foul. Whether he shouted or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 It’s weak. Yeah, you've said. Lots. It's still a foul. It's an absolute bullshit decision, yet again. Every single match. Refereeing decisions can go against you. Stuff like fouls on defenders and goalkeepers are fatal. This one isn’t 100% a foul. Even Rafa doesn’t think it’s a foul. In these instances you need your player to be strong and only be beaten by a massive foul/incident. Some arms on him. No body. No push. Boly wanted it more and he did so fair enough imo. De Jong wanted it more. http://a.abcnews.go.com/images/Sports/GTY_soccer_controversial_2010_kick_kab_140625_4x3_992.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackyboy Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 If Dubs catches it he can then waste vital seconds, if he punches it it probably comes straight back at him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 It WAS a foul AND a cock-up by Dubravka (who should have punched it). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now