Scoot Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 This has gone weirdly very quiet. Never seen that coming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The quieter the better. The transfer deadline has nothing to do with the takeover. I suspect if he was thinking of selling it would have been in April or May (speculation). The leak coming out has put the spotlight on something that isn’t done yet. The only news agency that’s written it said anything that can be trusted to this point is the WSJ. The guy who wrote the article said they wouldn’t have published it if it wasn’t very likely to happen. Anyone mentioning timelines or anything else to do with it since is pure guess work/speculation. Those claiming to have sources at the club didn’t know jack before the WSJ wrote their piece. The fucking balls on you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The quieter the better. The transfer deadline has nothing to do with the takeover. I suspect if he was thinking of selling it would have been in April or May (speculation). The leak coming out has put the spotlight on something that isn’t done yet. The only news agency that’s written it said anything that can be trusted to this point is the WSJ. The guy who wrote the article said they wouldn’t have published it if it wasn’t very likely to happen. Anyone mentioning timelines or anything else to do with it since is pure guess work/speculation. Those claiming to have sources at the club didn’t know jack before the WSJ wrote their piece. As opposed to your complete bullshit speculation? How are you even still here ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Just because he bullshitted about the last takeover, it doesn’t mean he isn’t talking sense now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Oh how I long for the days before the internet when the world wasn't ending if you didn't have an update every 5 minutes or need everyone to publicly announce their decisions. For all we know MA had a decision to make, he made it on Tuesday and the process is continuing between the 2 parties - as it should. It's either bollocks or we will know when its done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Little Waster Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 That professor bloke who’s usually fairly astute and fair - Simon Chadwick I think he’s called - has apparently done some digging in Saudi about this rumour. Come up sucking his thumb by all accounts, the chief response being “why would we buy Newcastle when we have the money to buy Man Utd?”. So that’s errrr, a bit shit really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweMag Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Simon Chadwick knows nothing. I think it’s very clear the people from Saudi Arabia are involved in this deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Because Manchester United aren't for sale? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 He sounds , er I don't know..jeleous? Envious? Of what could happen to us? What club does he support? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Cos Man U rejected their approach? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The professor is a manc. https://www.salford.ac.uk/business-school/our-staff/business-academics/simon-chadwick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooonDoom Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The line that came out earlier in the week was that they wound't sell and they didn't think they'd change their mind as the Glazers are raking it in. I still think the leak could be the final roll of the dice for them to get Man Utd. Especially since it came from the Saudi's autobiographer and "both sides are irritated with the leak". Both sides could mean Staveley and Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 He keeps asking the same question, not realising that the answer has always been because Man Utd are not for sale. Staveley tried to buy Liverpool twice as well, the reason she never did, because it wasn’t for sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 The quieter the better. The transfer deadline has nothing to do with the takeover. I suspect if he was thinking of selling it would have been in April or May (speculation). The leak coming out has put the spotlight on something that isn’t done yet. The only news agency that’s written it said anything that can be trusted to this point is the WSJ. The guy who wrote the article said they wouldn’t have published it if it wasn’t very likely to happen. Anyone mentioning timelines or anything else to do with it since is pure guess work/speculation. Those claiming to have sources at the club didn’t know jack before the WSJ wrote their piece. The fucking balls on you. Aye. Can he not be 'stored' alongside anything from the chronicle? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 He keeps asking the same question, not realising that the answer has always been because Man Utd are not for sale. Staveley tried to buy Liverpool twice as well, the reason she never did, because it wasn’t for sale. Is NUFC for sale though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 He keeps asking the same question, not realising that the answer has always been because Man Utd are not for sale. Staveley tried to buy Liverpool twice as well, the reason she never did, because it wasn’t for sale. Is NUFC for sale though? Well we'll see. But the question was 'why doesn't he just buy Man Utd?' And I think the answer is fairly obvious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Because Manchester United aren't for sale? And you could buy us and invest 1 Billion in us and it would still all cost less than it would cost to acquire Man United Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooonDoom Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Because Manchester United aren't for sale? And you could buy us and invest 1 Billion in us and it would still all cost less than it would cost to acquire Man United Are Man City considered as "big" a club as Man Utd/Liverpool now? (Honest question). If not the argument would be that they don't get the kudos in the medium term with Newcastle no matter what they do, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Because Manchester United aren't for sale? And you could buy us and invest 1 Billion in us and it would still all cost less than it would cost to acquire Man United Are Man City considered as "big" a club as Man Utd/Liverpool now? (Honest question). If not the argument would be that they don't get the kudos in the medium term with Newcastle no matter what they do, Nope, not in my mind. I still think we're a bigger club than Man City though, so what do I know :-D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 He sounds , er I don't know..jeleous? Envious? Of what could happen to us? What club does he support? You only need to look at the Uni he lectures at to answer that question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Additionally, if they are investing in the Newcastle area alongside the Reuben brothers, that’s also a reason why to invest in us as well. It’s well known that the Man City owners have done exactly that in Manchester. If they came to Newcastle then they would be able to buy land/property with virtually no competition. Doing the same in Manchester could easily just result in a dick waving challenge where the two groups would just be trying to outbid each other. Land and property would be much cheaper here than it would be in Manchester to begin with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejeck Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 No one has told him it isn't happening, they're questioning why it would happen. Secondly, it's not just about the acquisition of a football club, there is potentially a much bigger project on the cards involving regional development. A successful football team would only be one piece of the jigsaw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Slight deviation here but there is a company in Dubai looking at investing around £500m into Swansea (not involving the football club) so I could easily see Saudi Arabia looking to invest significant amounts of cash into a UK city that maybe isn't one of the glamour cities. To them £350m on NUFC as part of this would then make perfect sense rather than buying Man U and its actually a small piece of a bigger puzzle. They probably missed the boat on Liverpool mind with G&H were forced out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ankles Bennett Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Additionally, if they are investing in the Newcastle area alongside the Reuben brothers, that’s also a reason why to invest in us as well. It’s well known that the Man City owners have done exactly that in Manchester. If they came to Newcastle then they would be able to buy land/property with virtually no competition. Doing the same in Manchester could easily just result in a dick waving challenge where the two groups would just be trying to outbid each other. Land and property would be much cheaper here than it would be in Manchester to begin with. I was thinking that if this does happen they may be able to buy back the land that Ash sold so that we can immediately increase the size of SJP to something like a 100k seater stadium. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now