OpenC Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Woman from Barclays is entitled to her opinion; if the court wasn't sitting I'm not sure what people expect to complain about I have been called all sorts of things by barristers, and called them similar things back, when the judge isn't there or outside the court Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Yep calls her a liar. What if Staveley is lying? and if she's lying in court, then she's possibly lying to Caulkin about being confident the deal will go through. In which case, she isn't confident and the deal won't go through. The deal is off. f***, we've got 10 more years of Ashley. Go to bed Are you coming with? You're a bit weird Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Is there any indication of how long her case is going to last? Is it over today ? Likely to last a couple of month. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Yep calls her a liar. What if Staveley is lying? and if she's lying in court, then she's possibly lying to Caulkin about being confident the deal will go through. In which case, she isn't confident and the deal won't go through. The deal is off. Fuck, we've got 10 more years of Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Yep calls her a liar. What if Staveley is lying? and if she's lying in court, then she's possibly lying to Caulkin about being confident the deal will go through. In which case, she isn't confident and the deal won't go through. The deal is off. Fuck, we've got 10 more years of Ashley. Go to bed Are you coming with? ONLY to do a Bellamy, but harder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 I'd just like to clarify that the post about the deal being off & her lying to Caulkin was entirely tongue in cheek Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED209 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Woman from Barclays is entitled to her opinion; if the court wasn't sitting I'm not sure what people expect to complain about I have been called all sorts of things by barristers, and called them similar things back, when the judge isn't there or outside the court I’ve been called a liar when giving evidence a few times, all part of the game. A good bit of cross examination is quite exciting to be on the end of. Of course if it gets too hard you can always faint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Woman from Barclays is entitled to her opinion; if the court wasn't sitting I'm not sure what people expect to complain about I have been called all sorts of things by barristers, and called them similar things back, when the judge isn't there Don't think that applies when it's being streamed live mind and heard by quite a few people also. Looks like a few are reporting this also to the courts and press, may get interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jong24 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 I'd just like to clarify that the post about the deal being off & her lying to Staveley was entirely tongue in cheek Go have a beer ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 I'd just like to clarify that the post about the deal being off & her lying to Staveley was entirely tongue in cheek Go have a beer ? Not a on weekday, I'm up for a run tomorrow morning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chicken little Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 https://twitter.com/agbnufc/status/1271097034544726018 stone me, what a tart. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenC Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Woman from Barclays is entitled to her opinion; if the court wasn't sitting I'm not sure what people expect to complain about I have been called all sorts of things by barristers, and called them similar things back, when the judge isn't there Don't think that applies when it's being streamed live mind and heard by quite a few people also. Looks like a few are reporting this also to the courts and press, may get interesting. You can go and sit in any court in the country and hear legal teams talking to each other this way on the benches when the judge has gone back to their chambers. Honestly, there's nothing unusual here imo it's the nature of court hearings that one side thinks the other is lying. That's why they're there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWN Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 I'd just like to clarify that the post about the deal being off & her lying to Caulkin was entirely tongue in cheek No one cares Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Woman from Barclays is entitled to her opinion; if the court wasn't sitting I'm not sure what people expect to complain about I have been called all sorts of things by barristers, and called them similar things back, when the judge isn't there Don't think that applies when it's being streamed live mind and heard by quite a few people also. Looks like a few are reporting this also to the courts and press, may get interesting. You can go and sit in any court in the country and hear legal teams talking to each other this way on the benches when the judge has gone back to their chambers. Honestly, there's nothing unusual here imo Totally different to call someone a liar on a live stream which is off the record and which is in the public hearing, think you're kidding yourself there mind in you think that's nothing unusual. You just can't do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenC Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Well, I disagree but we'll see if it goes anywhere I watch court proceedings pretty much every day, and a lot of the time the link is still open but people are just talking. Maybe I'm just too used to that sort of thing for it to be a surprise to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 I'd just like to clarify that the post about the deal being off & her lying to Caulkin was entirely tongue in cheek No one cares meow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Well, I disagree but we'll see if it goes anywhere Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 There is probably some GDPR element in that if its recorded and they were aware that they are being recorded she has the right for it to be erased. And a possible Subject Access Request for this to be made available to her. *the above could all be bollocks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Well, I disagree but we'll see if it goes anywhere I watch court proceedings pretty much every day, and a lot of the time the link is still open but people are just talking. Maybe I'm just too used to that sort of thing for it to be a surprise to me. Makes no difference if you do listen or not, you cannot call people a liar on a live stream off the record, that is defamation of character and I'm quite sure Slaveley will be clapping her hands when this is pointed out. Anyway we're not going to agree, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Is there any indication of how long her case is going to last? Is it over today ? Likely to last a couple of month. Wew. Lass has a few things on her plate at the moment, then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Aye, I've covered plenty of court cases and there's all sorts said between barristers when the judge and jury aren't sitting. What's happened is just unprofessional, more than owt else. I'd have thought especially in the current climate people would be checking when their microphones and/or cameras are on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Lovely to see Newcastle fans uniting in defence of the horrendous treatment of massive Tory Amanda Staveley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Lovely to see Newcastle fans uniting in defence of the horrendous treatment of massive Tory Amanda Staveley What's her politics got to do with it? It could be Labour Jim from Sunderland or SNP Stewart from Glasgow and I would still be saying the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Lovely to see Newcastle fans uniting in defence of the horrendous treatment of massive Tory Amanda Staveley What's her politics got to do with it? It could be Labour Jim from Sunderland or SNP Stewart from Glasgow and I would still be saying the same. He's taking the piss man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts