JigsawGoesToPieces Posted Monday at 10:43 Share Posted Monday at 10:43 Maybe a more pay as you play deal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted Monday at 10:44 Share Posted Monday at 10:44 We will never learn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted Monday at 10:44 Share Posted Monday at 10:44 Just now, JigsawGoesToPieces said: Maybe a more pay as you play deal? Wilson would be at the food bank by the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallumG6 Posted Monday at 10:44 Share Posted Monday at 10:44 Incentive based = pay per game?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted Monday at 10:44 Share Posted Monday at 10:44 Just now, JigsawGoesToPieces said: Maybe a more pay as you play deal? See this suggested every now and then, are there any examples of this actually being a thing at the top level? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted Monday at 10:45 Share Posted Monday at 10:45 Just now, CallumG6 said: Incentive based = pay per game?? No chance it will be a lower basically salary with more bonuses. Tells me we aren't signing a striker this window unless we can't get him to sign which is a mistake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Cardigan Posted Monday at 10:45 Share Posted Monday at 10:45 I’ve defended him a fair bit, but it does feel like now is the time to go. I can’t see a guy with his ego accepting a bit part role on lower wages, it’s his last chance to get a good deal for himself. if a Leeds come in I’d still expect him to leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted Monday at 10:45 Share Posted Monday at 10:45 The only way it’s acceptable is if he’s getting paid per goal, if he has a stinker he gets £0 that week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted Monday at 10:46 Share Posted Monday at 10:46 Pay as you play still doesn't help us, he runs like he's wearing jeans and doc martins and limits Osula or whoever else we buy getting onto the pitch who might actually do something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izakaya Posted Monday at 10:46 Share Posted Monday at 10:46 We appear to be far too sentimental with players that are well expired. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieT Posted Monday at 10:46 Share Posted Monday at 10:46 Just now, CallumG6 said: Incentive based = pay per game?? That makes sense if his fitness was the only doubt, however it’s his contributions on the pitch that are as much the issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted Monday at 10:47 Share Posted Monday at 10:47 Eddie fuck off man on this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted Monday at 10:47 Share Posted Monday at 10:47 Pay as you play literally doesn't exist at the top level - I wonder what that tweet actually means Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Monday at 10:48 Share Posted Monday at 10:48 That wasn’t the first Ornstein embedded tweet I was hoping for Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted Monday at 10:48 Share Posted Monday at 10:48 Just now, Alberto2005 said: Eddie fuck off man on this one. Bloke needs to be shipped out - offers nothing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheikBoom Posted Monday at 10:49 Share Posted Monday at 10:49 He's leaving. He'll have known the club wouldn't renew & offer an incentive based contract. Great servant and wish him all the best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted Monday at 10:49 Share Posted Monday at 10:49 What an awful decision, bloke is absolutely finished. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted Monday at 10:49 Share Posted Monday at 10:49 (edited) Don't think it's sentiment at all tbh. We just have a lot of positions to fill in the window and finding a rotation option for Isak is difficult in the market. We'll be seeing if we can keep him around on the mega cheap as a failsafe. I don't agree with it but it's not sentiment. It's trying to navigate PSR as best we can. Think the chances are he'll have better offers from a promoted club or abroad. Edited Monday at 10:50 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted Monday at 10:49 Share Posted Monday at 10:49 Surely low base, high bonuses is a massive risk from his point of view? He'd be better off taking a step down or 2, or going abroad etc Even if he played for free, he'd feel like a waste of a bench space imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted Monday at 10:50 Share Posted Monday at 10:50 Pretty clear Eddie sees Osula as a winger then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted Monday at 10:51 Share Posted Monday at 10:51 1 minute ago, ponsaelius said: Don't think it's sentiment at all tbh. We just have a lot of positions to fill in the window and finding a rotation option for Isak is difficult in the market. We'll be seeing if we can keep him around on the mega cheap as a failsafe. I don't agree with it but it's not sentiment. It's trying to navigate PSR as best we can. Think the chances are he'll have better offers from a promoted club or abroad. He isn’t a rotation option though, he offers nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted Monday at 10:51 Share Posted Monday at 10:51 3 minutes ago, Menace said: Pay as you play literally doesn't exist at the top level - I wonder what that tweet actually means 5 minutes ago, r0cafella said: No chance it will be a lower basically salary with more bonuses. Tells me we aren't signing a striker this window unless we can't get him to sign which is a mistake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted Monday at 10:51 Share Posted Monday at 10:51 What the actual fuck man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiLvOR Posted Monday at 10:51 Share Posted Monday at 10:51 Oh ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted Monday at 10:51 Share Posted Monday at 10:51 I don't see the point of this, surely we know we need another striker who will be fit enough to cover for Isak? If Wilson stayed then we'd have 4 strikers? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now