Checko Posted Sunday at 07:46 Share Posted Sunday at 07:46 This is the power of FB ref stats. And the power of being able to pad your per 90 stats through short, high intensity substitute appearences. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted Sunday at 07:46 Share Posted Sunday at 07:46 Just now, Tsunami said: Hang on; it’s either a poor deal or it’s a good deal. We could all live with 35M. How can there be such a discrepancy in the fee? No reputable source is saying ten million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted Sunday at 07:47 Share Posted Sunday at 07:47 11 minutes ago, oldtype said: I just think it’s dumb to sell a cheap, local, homegrown player who would probably been happy to stay here for at least a few years even if he isn’t starting many games, when we’ll inevitably have to spend more than 10m to replace his squad spot at some point. It’s probably the least bad option we had, but horrible planning to be in this position in the first place. Maybe the club will replace him with a more effective footballer? Just a thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted Sunday at 07:48 Share Posted Sunday at 07:48 (edited) 3 minutes ago, NE27 said: Not arguing or anything, but what would you consider his value? I'd say 15m would be absolute tops for him, he's not got a lot behind him to back up anything more, other than maybe our fanbase hopes he would come good. I'd consider £35m to be a half decent fee as it happens.... Edited Sunday at 07:48 by TRon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunk Moreland Posted Sunday at 07:48 Share Posted Sunday at 07:48 (edited) 6 minutes ago, STM said: What a fantastic piece of business Insane that people were gannin mad about £10m when the only person who'd reported that price is a Twitter ITK who also said that AC Milan want Longstaff. Edited Sunday at 07:49 by Bunk Moreland Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted Sunday at 07:48 Share Posted Sunday at 07:48 Let's just remember, Elliot Anderson is seen as a young star in football circles. Just because it hasn't quite happened yet, doesn't mean it won't. He's going to be a cracking player. That's good money though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted Sunday at 07:48 Share Posted Sunday at 07:48 4 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said: If it’s £10m, PIF, PCP and RB can… 3 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said: £35m??? I take it back. PIF, PCP and RB in!!! Areet Dave... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted Sunday at 07:49 Share Posted Sunday at 07:49 3 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said: Best get revising those opinions lads. I don't really believe it mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted Sunday at 07:49 Share Posted Sunday at 07:49 2 minutes ago, Tsunami said: Hang on; it’s either a poor deal or it’s a good deal. We could all live with 35M. How can there be such a discrepancy in the fee? Because the 10m thing was a bullshit tweet from a bullshit tweet merchant? Everyone just ran with it so they could have a whinge about selling a mediocre player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted Sunday at 07:50 Share Posted Sunday at 07:50 35m no way surely!? Absolutely dont believe that. It would be like selling sand in the Sahara desert for coke prices. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cf Posted Sunday at 07:50 Share Posted Sunday at 07:50 £35m Fair fucking play it that's true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Sunday at 07:51 Share Posted Sunday at 07:51 There’s just no way he goes for £35m. £25m I could possibly imagine. I think he is worth decent money but he’s not played enough at the highest level and shown enough yet to command a £35m fee. I say that as a big fan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted Sunday at 07:51 Share Posted Sunday at 07:51 2 minutes ago, TRon said: I'd consider £35m to be a half decent fee as it happens.... I have impeccable timing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted Sunday at 07:51 Share Posted Sunday at 07:51 £35m, is an insane deal, as much as I want the guy to stay, as I think he could be a great player, you can't really turn that down. Pure profit too which covers us for a while wouldn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted Sunday at 07:51 Share Posted Sunday at 07:51 New sponsors coming in for Forest or an overpriced sale to us i Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Charlton Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 (edited) We must be buying someone from there in return,Gibbs White please Edited Sunday at 07:52 by Steve Charlton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 7 minutes ago, STM said: Hahahahahahaha. No way we’re getting that. Genuinely gone full Chelsea if we can sell two prospects for £68m. It covers the Hall and Tino purchases in their entirety and creates net zero spend on two of our chunkiest outlays in the period. Expect this means we give Forest something back in a slightly inflated MGW fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweMag Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 4 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: I’d be shocked if we don’t buy a forest player if 35 million is correct Neco Williams on his way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 4 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said: Maybe the club will replace him with a more effective footballer? Just a thought. How good do you want our fifth choice CM to be? Particularly given that PSR apparently has a permanent chokehold on our spending. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuv Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 Pretty gutted about this tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted Sunday at 07:53 Share Posted Sunday at 07:53 35 million for Anderson??? Hats to whoever got thar for him. Hopefully most if that fee rolls over into next seasons accounting period and sets us up nicely for the next 2 months... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted Sunday at 07:53 Share Posted Sunday at 07:53 (edited) I’m absolutely certain that Forest and us have a good bond, mainly because of FFP/PSR and similar restrictions. You got my back and I have yours kind of thing. Not a bad thing for them either to have us by their side going forward. But still, I struggle with the 35m fee Edited Sunday at 07:54 by Ikon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted Sunday at 07:53 Share Posted Sunday at 07:53 £35m 😳😂😂😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted Sunday at 07:53 Share Posted Sunday at 07:53 1 minute ago, Steve Charlton said: We must be buying someone from there in return,Gibbs White please Return of the king... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted Sunday at 07:54 Share Posted Sunday at 07:54 Just now, gbandit said: There’s just no way he goes for £35m. £25m I could possibly imagine. I think he is worth decent money but he’s not played enough at the highest level and shown enough yet to command a £35m fee. I say that as a big fan Suppose could be something like 25million with some appearence add-ons. Still that would a good fee for him and it'll be a good move for him. At his age he just has to play now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now