Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

So good it had to be posted in its entirety twice...

 

Twice !!

 

It needs to be posted TWENTY times, at least !!

 

I am just ashamed that I did not do what those two have done, ashamed.

 

Actually, there was a reason it was posted a second time, the first time it had to be done in a hurry (another member had asked for it, and I didn't have much time) and I had not been able to "highlight" the many sub-headings in the article . . so it was very difficult to read, just 'one long mass' of words. So, I took my time and did it again - properly.

 

Then (having done that) I actually went back and modified my original posting as well!

 

There, I've explained it for you, though I do not know why you would be so 'churlish' as to mention it in the first place . . . that is a FANTASTIC article, from some real NUFC patriots.

 

Should be re-posted first thing every morning, in my opinion !!!! 

 

Funny, my thoughts were - there he goes, using the million words of another to shout “I told you so” at the NO brethren.

 

You then compounded the point by using a million of your own words to call out my churlishness. See, it’s not your opinions, it’s your manner of expressing them. I’ve even tried blocking you, but everyone else either shares your relentless enthusiasm and quotes you, or thinks your relentless enthusiasm is a fucking bore and quotes you.

 

We get it, you were on the “always happening” train from the start. But you’re seriously worse than the most garrulous cross-training vegan in existence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So good it had to be posted in its entirety twice...

 

Twice !!

 

It needs to be posted TWENTY times, at least !!

 

I am just ashamed that I did not do what those two have done, ashamed.

 

Actually, there was a reason it was posted a second time, the first time it had to be done in a hurry (another member had asked for it, and I didn't have much time) and I had not been able to "highlight" the many sub-headings in the article . . so it was very difficult to read, just 'one long mass' of words. So, I took my time and did it again - properly.

 

Then (having done that) I actually went back and modified my original posting as well!

 

There, I've explained it for you, though I do not know why you would be so 'churlish' as to mention it in the first place . . . that is a FANTASTIC article, from some real NUFC patriots.

 

Should be re-posted first thing every morning, in my opinion !!!! 

 

Funny, my thoughts were - there he goes, using the million words of another to shout “I told you so” at the NO brethren.

 

You then compounded the point by using a million of your own words to call out my churlishness. See, it’s not your opinions, it’s your manner of expressing them. I’ve even tried blocking you, but everyone else either shares your relentless enthusiasm and quotes you, or thinks your relentless enthusiasm is a fucking bore and quotes you.

 

We get it, you were on the “always happening” train from the start. But you’re seriously worse than the most garrulous cross-training vegan in existence.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed the Newcastle Consortium supporters group have had their twitter account suspended today.

Hmmm. I hope that's not a bad thing.

While it was funny, their rhyme tweet yesterday felt a little cocky and unprofessional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So good it had to be posted in its entirety twice...

 

Twice !!

 

It needs to be posted TWENTY times, at least !!

 

I am just ashamed that I did not do what those two have done, ashamed.

 

Actually, there was a reason it was posted a second time, the first time it had to be done in a hurry (another member had asked for it, and I didn't have much time) and I had not been able to "highlight" the many sub-headings in the article . . so it was very difficult to read, just 'one long mass' of words. So, I took my time and did it again - properly.

 

Then (having done that) I actually went back and modified my original posting as well!

 

There, I've explained it for you, though I do not know why you would be so 'churlish' as to mention it in the first place . . . that is a FANTASTIC article, from some real NUFC patriots.

 

Should be re-posted first thing every morning, in my opinion !!!! 

 

Funny, my thoughts were - there he goes, using the million words of another to shout “I told you so” at the NO brethren.

 

You then compounded the point by using a million of your own words to call out my churlishness. See, it’s not your opinions, it’s your manner of expressing them. I’ve even tried blocking you, but everyone else either shares your relentless enthusiasm and quotes you, or thinks your relentless enthusiasm is a fucking bore and quotes you.

 

We get it, you were on the “always happening” train from the start. But you’re seriously worse than the most garrulous cross-training vegan in existence.

 

 

How long did your "lets get everything 100% wrong / lets misunderstand peoples motives" Training Course last? 

 

Must have been at least a week.

 

Have you any idea how ridiculous your contrived fantasy sounds man??

 

You should be able to recognise what is not being said and why, and what is being said, and why.

 

You should be able to recognise what peoples motives are, and not 'invent motives' for them.

 

Yes, I am disappointed that another Newcastle United supporter (you) could so misunderstand (or 'appear' to) what is being written on a Newcastle United Fans Forum.

 

Yes (again) I am responding again because (surely) I can get through to you!

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to relax man.  You go 100mph relentlessly.

 

There was no need at all to post the article twice tbh. Is it a big deal that you did? Not really. Just calm down :lol:

 

Agree with your sentiments . . but can you write to our tame fantasist as well please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

How long did your "lets get everything 100% wrong / lets misunderstand peoples motives" Training Course last? 

 

Must have been at least a week.

 

Have you any idea how ridiculous your contrived fantasy sounds man??

 

You should be able to recognise what is not being said and why, and what is being said, and why.

 

You should be able to recognise what peoples motives are, and not 'invent motives' for them.

 

Yes, I am disappointed that another Newcastle United supporter (you) could so misunderstand (or 'appear' to) what is being written on a Newcastle United Fans Forum.

 

Yes (again) I am responding again because (surely) I can get through to you!

 

 

 

 

 

 

But you’re seriously worse than the most garrulous cross-training vegan in existence.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a waste of a non-reply!

 

It's more than you deserve, but you've prompted me to mirror your turgid verbosity.

 

When I first joined this board, there were two old timers. NE5 and HTL. Both absolute fucking bores when they got on their hobby horse of how Shepherd wasn't that bad, and to be careful what we wished for. These two drove posters from the board with their interminable hammering of the same points.

 

You, sir, are worse than either of them. And so I'll refrain from making snide comments even when you punch people in the face with your utter tedium. I'll not interact with you again :thup:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d happily take manorparks positivity over the turgid negativity and general downbeat to the point of absurdity of some other folk who post on here. Crack on manorpark. (Although please don’t post that same article 20 times, as good as it is!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a waste of a non-reply!

 

It's more than you deserve, but you've prompted me to mirror your turgid verbosity.

 

When I first joined this board, there were two old timers. NE5 and HTL. Both absolute fucking bores when they got on their hobby horse of how Shepherd wasn't that bad, and to be careful what we wished for. These two drove posters from the board with their interminable hammering of the same points.

 

You, sir, are worse than either of them. And so I'll refrain from making snide comments even when you punch people in the face with your utter tedium. I'll not interact with you again :thup:

 

Yet they were both correct.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d happily take manorparks positivity over the turgid negativity and general downbeat to the point of absurdity of some other folk who post on here. Crack on manorpark. (Although please don’t post that same article 20 times, as good as it is!)

 

19?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can people give Manor Park a break?

He’s a bit over positive, but theirs a few in here and on the forum who are over negative, in fact we have people filling every match thread wishing we lose. If we have to accept them then by the same standard we have to accept Manor Park with his level of positivity as well. His positivity is a welcome change to the normal narrative in my opinion.

 

So he posted the same article twice, he’s apologised for that and maybe it was a mistake. Plenty of people repeatedly post long articles and posts, including HTT’s posts which are twice as long. No offence HTT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Equally no problem with manorpark

 

In fact the ageist remark from Raconteur was quite unpleasant

 

You're having a laugh - I call my father old timer. It's a term of affection - they were actually pretty decent posters when not drivelling on about Shepherd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can people give Manor Park a break?

He’s a bit over positive, but theirs a few in here and on the forum who are over negative, in fact we have people filling every match thread wishing we lose. If we have to accept them then by the same standard we have to accept Manor Park with his level of positivity as well. His positivity is a welcome change to the normal narrative in my opinion.

 

So he posted the same article twice, he’s apologised for that and maybe it was a mistake. Plenty of people repeatedly post long articles and posts, including HTT’s posts which are twice as long. No offence HTT.

 

I like him. He’s just very excitable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Equally no problem with manorpark

 

In fact the ageist remark from Raconteur was quite unpleasant

 

You're having a laugh - I call my father old timer. It's a term of affection - they were actually pretty decent posters when not drivelling on about Shepherd.

 

It wasn’t just that phrase the whole post just reeked of the superiority of youth.

 

FWIW Manorpark has been posting on this forum for 13 years and whilst I have been aware of his existence until now I can’t really remember any particularly strong opinions on anything. Opinions on whatever are always kept where they are meant to be, on threads about the subject.

 

Compare that to NE5, you’d be talking about Darren Ambrose scoring for Charlton and then suddenly the thread would be taken nicer by chain quotes about the board, with plenty of  :spit: thrown in

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed the Newcastle Consortium supporters group have had their twitter account suspended today.

Hmmm. I hope that's not a bad thing.

While it was funny, their rhyme tweet yesterday felt a little cocky and unprofessional.

 

The PL will be well aware of the account now, I wouldn’t be surprised if they reported them. However, while I agree they need to keep it professional, I don’t think at this point they’ve done anything wrong.

 

If anything it may even show how rattled PL are, and the tit for tat we can expect. Our clubs relationship with the league is toxic at this point.

 

But I do agree with manorpark, these 2 lads have stood up for the supporters of this club and showed we’re not taking this lying down. It most definitely got the blood pumping reading Keith Patterson in the gazette yesterday, great stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Equally no problem with manorpark

 

In fact the ageist remark from Raconteur was quite unpleasant

 

You're having a laugh - I call my father old timer. It's a term of affection - they were actually pretty decent posters when not drivelling on about Shepherd.

 

It wasn’t just that phrase the whole post just reeked of the superiority of youth.

 

FWIW Manorpark has been posting on this forum for 13 years and whilst I have been aware of his existence until now I can’t really remember any particularly strong opinions on anything. Opinions on whatever are always kept where they are meant to be, on threads about the subject.

 

Compare that to NE5, you’d be talking about Darren Ambrose scoring for Charlton and then suddenly the thread would be taken nicer by chain quotes about the board, with plenty of  :spit: thrown in

 

PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

This maybe answers it re their twitter account.

 

steve

@oldheatonian

·

29m

Understand its Nothing to worry about at this stage regarding

@NCSL1892

twitter.

Simple problem of twitter acct verification reacting to a dodgy handset and number of failed attempts to access the acct over the last 12 hours

Link to post
Share on other sites

This maybe answers it re their twitter account.

 

steve

@oldheatonian

·

29m

Understand its Nothing to worry about at this stage regarding

@NCSL1892

twitter.

Simple problem of twitter acct verification reacting to a dodgy handset and number of failed attempts to access the acct over the last 12 hours

 

Premier league hackers trying to access their PM's. Bastard hackers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...