Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

And a 'regulatory body' for want of a better term, who have had their core product nicked and one of their key partners 'wronged' in the process.

 

Whichever way we chop it, and I really really really want it to happen, it was hardly unforeseeable that the PL wouldn't be readily compliant in approving a takeover nor would one of their key rights holders be an enabler for it.

 

Hence, it's probably legal or bust, before there's any mutually beneficial deal with Bein.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

 

This is kind of what I meant, the closest thing in the O+D test is if someone has been convicted of a crime (or theft). Nobody from the consortium has. It absolutely causes an issue for the PL with the piracy but the key thing is its not under the rules of their own test. They can't change the rules just because Bein don't like what's happened.

I guess this is where our legal team come in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

 

Well you would imagine they must have done otherwise why would there be so much confidence from the legal team employed by NUFC that we will win the case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

 

Well you would imagine they must have done otherwise why would there be so much confidence from the legal team employed by NUFC that we will win the case?

 

I hope so but part of me wonders whether Ashley just wants to be enough of an irritation to force it through (tanks on their lawn etc etc).

 

I'd also say any 'confidence' around legal cases I take with a pinch of salt given the cheerleaders around the buy side regime have been inaccurate at all turns to date.

 

It just needs to play out, minus the cheerleading from people like the NCSL knobhead, imho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

 

This is kind of what I meant, the closest thing in the O+D test is if someone has been convicted of a crime (or theft). Nobody from the consortium has. It absolutely causes an issue for the PL with the piracy but the key thing is its not under the rules of their own test. They can't change the rules just because Bein don't like what's happened.

I guess this is where our legal team come in.

 

I think you're right.

 

We'll have to either prove they've misapplied the test or have enough evidence of Bein influence/potential corruption that the PL fear this getting into the public domain.

 

You'd imagine their legal counsel will be equally as robust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's quite amazing how much influence Bein have over a takeover of our club. I know it's a piracy issue but ffs, we have a buyer and a seller.

 

If the PL have blocked the bid due to piracy then it’s perfectly reasonable to block it unless an agreement is reached between the Gulf states, otherwise BeIN will sue the fuck out of the PL imo

 

And also we have to remember that the PL themselves have desperately tried to bring legal cases against KSA directly. Seperate from Bein (albeit probably at their behest).

 

The PL, rightly, have a problem with the KSA regime. They're hardly going to be falling over themselves to let these 'thiefs' have a stake in their prime product. 1/20th of it.

 

So 5% of their core product is owned by the very people that have been nicking it.

 

It's not a stretch to see why it was never straight forward despite protestations from the buyers about their supreme confidence etc.

 

From the perspective of someone who really wants this deal done, I can only hope the PL have made some grave legal error in the application of their own Owners Test.

 

This is kind of what I meant, the closest thing in the O+D test is if someone has been convicted of a crime (or theft). Nobody from the consortium has. It absolutely causes an issue for the PL with the piracy but the key thing is its not under the rules of their own test. They can't change the rules just because Bein don't like what's happened.

I guess this is where our legal team come in.

 

I think you're right.

 

We'll have to either prove they've misapplied the test or have enough evidence of Bein influence/potential corruption that the PL fear this getting into the public domain.

 

You'd imagine their legal counsel will be equally as robust.

 

And on those two points I think we can all agree in here that through our own eyes we've seen the PL play things away from their own rule book. That's simply not allowed and it's their own fault for not making the OD tests robust enough.

 

Also I believe this has a lot more to it -

 

Bein have already paid for the new contract which apparently includes the KSA region. They need to broadcast there. Get the takeover done and you can do it is quite a checkmate position for the Saudi's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Why do you continually argue with people who want the same thing as you?  :lol:

 

You need to take a break my man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Why do you continually argue with people who want the same thing as you?  :lol:

 

You need to take a break my man.

 

You speak on Keith's name, Keith gon' clap back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Why do you continually argue with people who want the same thing as you?  :lol:

 

You need to take a break my man.

 

You speak on Keith's name, Keith gon' clap back.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just needs to play out, minus the cheerleading from people like the NCSL knobhead, imho.

 

Bit harsh Minhosa[/member] he’s took a year off work and sunk a lot of his own personal money into what seems to be part of a clever strategy in forcing the pace of pre arbitration negotiations and arbitration itself, as the EPL have to answer his claims and likely to lose costing them a lot of money therefore making them more keen along with BeIn who are equally as guilty of anti competition involvement of sorting before answering the charge. They’ve made it clear they can only answer it once arbitration is completed so it must take place unless sorted before arbitration.  Certainly amounts to more than cheerleading.

 

Am I right in thinking he must be the owner of Keith Pattinson estate agents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Well, I'm not going out of my way to sensationalise nor give anyone false hope, so there is that.

 

You'd have maintained far more credibility if you didn't engage because, every time you do, a little bit of belief you know what you're doing disappears forever.

 

Your patter on here is also relentlessly boring. If you've got positive ITK then share it, if you're just a signed up member to shout 'soon' then know that it's reassuring no fucker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Why do you continually argue with people who want the same thing as you?  :lol:

 

You need to take a break my man.

 

No break needed my man.

 

I’ve disagreed with a point of view, this place would be boring if we all agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just needs to play out, minus the cheerleading from people like the NCSL knobhead, imho.

 

Bit harsh Minhosa[/member] he’s took a year off work and sunk a lot of his own personal money into what seems to be part of a clever strategy in forcing the pace of pre arbitration negotiations and arbitration itself, as the EPL have to answer his claims and likely to lose costing them a lot of money therefore making them more keen along with BeIn who are equally as guilty of anti competition involvement of sorting before answering the charge. They’ve made it clear they can only answer it once arbitration is completed so it must take place unless sorted before arbitration.  Certainly amounts to more than cheerleading.

 

Am I right in thinking he must be the owner of Keith Pattinson estate agents?

 

IF this happens, it's not because a couple of blokes have chucked £50k at it and made a song and dance. As much as Whitley would like to believe that to be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Well, I'm not going out of my way to sensationalise nor give anyone false hope, so there is that.

 

You'd have maintained far more credibility if you didn't engage because, every time you do, a little bit of belief you know what you're doing disappears forever.

 

Your patter on here is also relentlessly boring. If you've got positive ITK then share it, if you're just a signed up member to shout 'soon' then know that it's reassuring no f***er.

 

I’m not here to reassure you pal and this false hope line is embarrassing.

 

If you want to insult someone proactively assisting this takeover then crack on.

 

But you’re own contribution is zero.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be clear when this takeovers announced I’m going to have a f***ing field day in here. You can stick you’re 48 hr ban, I’m predicting a lifetime ban for myself.  :lol:

 

 

 

A f***ing field day of celebrating whilst others are doing the same? Woo. Radical.

 

Do you seriously think there's any member on here that does not want to be taken over?

 

Just because we're not all fully fledged members of that Keith Daftcunt Brigade doesn't mean we want it any less.

 

That daft c*** is doing a lot more than yourself. You just sit back and let it play out, we’ll ignore the fact he is in contact with vital players in this process.

 

Well, I'm not going out of my way to sensationalise nor give anyone false hope, so there is that.

 

You'd have maintained far more credibility if you didn't engage because, every time you do, a little bit of belief you know what you're doing disappears forever.

 

Your patter on here is also relentlessly boring. If you've got positive ITK then share it, if you're just a signed up member to shout 'soon' then know that it's reassuring no fucker.

 

Always enjoy reading Whitley Mag, Rocky, Scotty66, reefatoon and others who try and look forward to the good times ahead with their lively posts. Honest debate is what this forum is all about.The many positive rants will always bring out the opposite feelings in others. I doubt many, if any, don't want this takeover to happen, its just that having seen so many disasterous attempts previously, people naturally feel this is going to be yet another one. I for one, though, enjoy the positive vibes of the many posters who, may not offer any itk info but through the many tweets, articles, hearsay etc try to make our day that much more cheerful. Yes, members have just as much right to disagree/disregard these posts and this is what makes the forum so interesting...lively debate. What I can't stand are the posters who deliberately wind up people just to get a reaction...fortunately these are few and far between. Let's continue with the heated dialogue, keep it civilised, whichever point of view you follow and lets hope it all ends up positively...oh and f*** off Bruce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does it work with the PL selling the licence to broadcast their games in KSA to another country? That always seemed a bit odd to me.

 

Yes they own the product - but not the national airwaves.

 

Just because the PL says ‘company x’ is the licencee, that puts the countries arbitrarily involved in the region under no legal obligation to allow them to do so.  (Does it?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...