Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SJHL QC saying its wrong to say PIF are still at the table, though this could just be part of his argument regarding loss of sale, etc.

 

But also, confirming even if the PL approved the sale tomorrow, the CAT case may still go forward for costs claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...