Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lazarus said:

Is it Arsenal who have Visit Rwanda?


Aye, says Rwanda pays £7m for their brand to be on the Arsenal sleeve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite clever this. Saudi give “development money” to Botswana. Perhaps for say infrastructure project or something.Botswana become our sponsor. Very difficult to prove the money is coming from PIF.

 

 

Would be great if we could open up an academy similar to that of “right to dream” there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30/05/2022 at 18:02, TheBrownBottle said:

Aren’t Saudia owned by the state?  I’m not sure if the ‘related parties’ / separation thing will rear its ugly head, but you can guarantee a number of clubs will cry foul if we’re sponsored by Saudia next season for a jillion quid a year

 

Of course, I suspect they could wrap up the PL in litigation as a giant ‘FU’ but Staveley said they intended to play by the rules

 

It strikes me that we might end up with non-Saudi sponsorship - from large organisations who have or want links to PIF …

Botswana sponsorship was the sort of thing I was on about - chuck several million in sponsorship money, and bag yourself some inward investment from PIF … nowt in writing, of course …

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II
9 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said:

Anyone else sensing a big day tomorrow?

 

multiple announcements??

Friday 3.00pm is the usual drill

 

 

Edited by HTT II

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

The hilarious part of all of this - if it turns out to be the case - is that the Super League Six can’t whinge, as Arsenal have already had a similar arrangement.  :) 


Exactly why they’re doing it, also opens the door for visit Saudi the year after

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RodneyCisse said:

 
You’re telling me Claire’s don’t sell diamonds?

I'll be right pissed off if the £3.50 diamond hair pin I got the missus isn't real diamond like!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, huss9 said:

chelsea had a load of debt. theyve had to clear it for the buy out.

They didn’t HAVE to clear it. It’s just been written off by Abramovich.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Manxst said:

They didn’t HAVE to clear it. It’s just been written off by Abramovich.

yeah sure, but i meant technically they weren't debt free like that article mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, huss9 said:

yeah sure, but i meant technically they weren't debt free like that article mentioned.

But that article is from today. Today they’re literally debt free. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Manxst said:

They didn’t HAVE to clear it. It’s just been written off by Abramovich.

Didn’t the Boehly consortium pay off the debt just that it goes to charitable causes and not to Abramovich or did I imagine that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...