Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Hudson said:

Which club’s top 4 place do we want to take the most.

 

Liverpool for me personally.

 

Joint with Man U for me. Both sets of fans would provide the greatest melt down I think aswell, if we were keeping them out of the top 4 year on year.

 

I really hope we turn into an absolute powerhouse down the line, not soon or anything I love the slow growth, but I want us to reach a point that even if the owners left it would be quite difficult for us to fall that far back, with all the infrastructure that would've been put in place by that point.

 

Newcastle United as a fully established top 4 team, competiting for the title and cups each season would be some fucking turn around from the shit we've had.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BonesJones said:

 

Joint with Man U for me. Both sets of fans would provide the greatest melt down I think aswell, if we were keeping them out of the top 4 year on year.

 

I really hope we turn into an absolute powerhouse down the line, not soon or anything I love the slow growth, but I want us to reach a point that even if the owners left it would be quite difficult for us to fall that far back, with all the infrastructure that would've been put in place by that point.

 

Newcastle United as a fully established top 4 team, competiting for the title and cups each season will be some fucking turn around from the shit we've had.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, midds said:

Got a feeling this will be like the 5 subs rule. They'll just continue to put it up for a vote until it eventually passes and then that'll be that. They'll wait until Sheff U go down and try again and it'll (probably rightly) pass. It's a rule that could benefit us in the short term but it's not great for the game in general just moving players around a group of owned clubs on a whim, Watford/Udinese have taken the piss recently - not broken any rules but it's not 'right' imo

 

Agree with this tbf, just the audacity of Brighton, Bournemouth and one or two others voting against this when they exploit the fuck out of it with clubs the other way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

Agree with this tbf, just the audacity of Brighton, Bournemouth and one or two others voting against this when they exploit the fuck out of it with clubs the other way.

Aye the hypocrisy is ridiculous but they've used the vote the way they see fit and it's now out in the open for all to see. 

 

Completely torn between deliberately ignoring the option that's still available to make them look like the gaggle of paranoid reactionary cunts they are and drafting in Neves, Kante, Mahrez, Laporte and Benzema on about 10% of their wages purely to see the fume 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BonesJones said:

 

Joint with Man U for me. Both sets of fans would provide the greatest melt down I think aswell, if we were keeping them out of the top 4 year on year.

 

I really hope we turn into an absolute powerhouse down the line, not soon or anything I love the slow growth, but I want us to reach a point that even if the owners left it would be quite difficult for us to fall that far back, with all the infrastructure that would've been put in place by that point.

 

Newcastle United as a fully established top 4 team, competiting for the title and cups each season would be some fucking turn around from the shit we've had.

I’d be more than happy for man united to finish second behind us every year if it meant Liverpool fucked off out of every professional league, taking Klopp with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, midds said:

Aye the hypocrisy is ridiculous but they've used the vote the way they see fit and it's now out in the open for all to see. 

 

Completely torn between deliberately ignoring the option that's still available to make them look like the gaggle of paranoid reactionary cunts they are and drafting in Neves, Kante, Mahrez, Laporte and Benzema on about 10% of their wages purely to see the fume 

No no, don't ignore it. Have no intention of using it but keep floating stories that were interested in whoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, madras said:

Right then, what does that mean for us ?

No change, related party transactions need to show fair market value but the need to show equivalent offers from other potential sponsors hasn’t passed

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SAK said:

No change, related party transactions need to show fair market value but the need to show equivalent offers from other potential sponsors hasn’t passed


Would just be creating a load of work if that had been passed (for everyone that is)

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Joelinton7 said:

Barely made it halfway through that. Newcastle……are……allowed….to…..sign…Neves.

If they're going to make out that we can now do that without referencing that othes can also, should they state that this attempt, mid way through the season, is purely about trying to stop us?

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stifler said:

Liverpool fans yet again starting say they should have kept on the Super League train.

Honestly, I’ve been saying it for a while, watch them, their fans are not as against it as they would have you believe.

Horrible fuckers so insufferable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...