Dr Venkman Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 On 01/02/2025 at 16:44, Miggys First Goal said: And where is the Chinese league now? China. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 Adverts for Liverpool's Official Lawn Partner on Facebook. Even just bringing in a couple of million over a dozen 'partners' would help on the PSR front, surely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 (edited) 21 hours ago, cubaricho said: Fuck I hate the photo in this. Lot of winning going on there 🙂 Best U.S president in history to be clear. Edited February 8 by Teasy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonAbroad Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 On 28/04/2023 at 19:52, ToonAbroad said: Understand it's only a 2 year deal, so gives a decent boost to current numbers but also will not be long to arrange a bigger deal once hopefully two seasons of CL football are under the belt to justify a bigger number. Apparently there was an offer of 22m for 5 years on the table too so this seems like a good outcome I think. Random Wednesday brainfart. Back in April 2023 I'd heard that the Sela deal was for 2 years initially - which would mean it's coming up for renewal this summer already. When it was announced, it was simply called a 'multi-year deal' which could mean anything. If the two years is true (and I believe it was given where it came from), would we expect an increase and more PSR headroom next season? Or same terms? Given the partnership so far feels pretty successful, it feels like one we'd probably be keen to extend. Curious if anybody heard anything about where we stand? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I’d predict a bidding war between Saudi companies to sponsor us. Probably ending in a £200m a season deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 minute ago, ToonAbroad said: Random Wednesday brainfart. Back in April 2023 I'd heard that the Sela deal was for 2 years initially - which would mean it's coming up for renewal this summer already. When it was announced, it was simply called a 'multi-year deal' which could mean anything. If the two years is true (and I believe it was given where it came from), would we expect an increase and more PSR headroom next season? Or same terms? Given the partnership so far feels pretty successful, it feels like one we'd probably be keen to extend. Curious if anybody heard anything about where we stand? Things may have changed now with Man City’s case meaning the Premier League have to prove it’s not FMV. Maybe now we might go for a bigger deal with one of the bigger names that PIF are involved in. Their new airline is launching this year as well. I think we’ll keep Sela on regardless as a secondary sponsor. They have worked well with us in terms of the shirts for deaf fans, the fanzone etc, and the club will be lean to work with them in regards to our new stadium, and it’s facilities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 minute ago, Stifler said: Things may have changed now with Man City’s case meaning the Premier League have to prove it’s not FMV. Maybe now we might go for a bigger deal with one of the bigger names that PIF are involved in. Their new airline is launching this year as well. I think we’ll keep Sela on regardless as a secondary sponsor. They have worked well with us in terms of the shirts for deaf fans, the fanzone etc, and the club will be lean to work with them in regards to our new stadium, and it’s facilities. Sela to sleeve, yeet Noon into the sun. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 55 minutes ago, JT24 said: Sela to sleeve, yeet Noon into the sun. Training kit imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 21 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: Training kit imo I wouldn't mind it but get that disgusting yellow eyesore away from our shirts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted Monday at 12:58 Share Posted Monday at 12:58 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted Monday at 14:34 Share Posted Monday at 14:34 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Monday at 19:53 Share Posted Monday at 19:53 On 12/02/2025 at 23:27, RS said: I’d predict a bidding war between Saudi companies to sponsor us. Probably ending in a £200m a season deal There was nothing stopping this from occurring previously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted Monday at 20:44 Share Posted Monday at 20:44 7 hours ago, FloydianMag said: I swear that’s one of burnsie’s 500 accounts/personalities. Layout of the tweets are the same. If it is him. I’d take tweet this with a pinch of salt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted Monday at 20:50 Share Posted Monday at 20:50 56 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: There was nothing stopping this from occurring previously. There wasn't? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted Monday at 20:55 Share Posted Monday at 20:55 1 hour ago, TheBrownBottle said: There was nothing stopping this from occurring previously. Wouldn’t FMV have made that a non starter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Monday at 20:57 Share Posted Monday at 20:57 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Chris L said: I swear that’s one of burnsie’s 500 accounts/personalities. Layout of the tweets are the same. If it is him. I’d take tweet this with a pinch of salt It’s reported in the Chronicle, he’s just aggregating news stories without providing the source so people think he’s ITK. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/what-yasir-al-rumayyan-said-31014973 Edited Monday at 20:59 by Stifler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Monday at 21:32 Share Posted Monday at 21:32 39 minutes ago, Unbelievable said: There wasn't? 34 minutes ago, SAK said: Wouldn’t FMV have made that a non starter? No, if there was no direct link to PIF (ie they are private companies) and / or there are multiple bids then there is no issue under the rules. KSA companies could have done this at any time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McDog Posted Monday at 21:35 Share Posted Monday at 21:35 3 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: No, if there was no direct link to PIF (ie they are private companies) and / or there are multiple bids then there is no issue under the rules. KSA companies could have done this at any time. That would have triggered an emergency meeting no doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris L Posted Monday at 21:38 Share Posted Monday at 21:38 40 minutes ago, Stifler said: It’s reported in the Chronicle, he’s just aggregating news stories without providing the source so people think he’s ITK. https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/what-yasir-al-rumayyan-said-31014973 Sounds like something he would do. wouldn’t be surprised if he’s another account that comments on all of that one disagreeing with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Monday at 21:39 Share Posted Monday at 21:39 Just now, McDog said: That would have triggered an emergency meeting no doubt. Hard to see how that would or could’ve been blocked - if you don’t allow competitive market tenders what can you allow? Or bids from the same nation as the owners - can’t see that being popular. PIF haven’t even used their position within KSA to ‘encourage’ these kind of deals. Everyone seems to be waiting for the dominos to fall and then they spring into action. To date, that hasn’t occurred. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Monday at 21:41 Share Posted Monday at 21:41 Just now, Chris L said: Sounds like something he would do. wouldn’t be surprised if he’s another account that comments on all of that one disagreeing with it. He does. He has one attacking journalists and other accounts, then one defending them and calling out his alt accounts. He’s a fucking freak, and it’s shocking to think that he’s a father. The general rule of thumb for any account that shares ‘NUFC news’ without having someone actually show their face, then it’s one of his accounts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted Monday at 21:49 Share Posted Monday at 21:49 7 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Hard to see how that would or could’ve been blocked - if you don’t allow competitive market tenders what can you allow? Or bids from the same nation as the owners - can’t see that being popular. PIF haven’t even used their position within KSA to ‘encourage’ these kind of deals. Everyone seems to be waiting for the dominos to fall and then they spring into action. To date, that hasn’t occurred. Like anyone else on here you have no idea what PIF have or haven't done with regards to sponsorhip, nor what the PL have done to block deals. 13 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: No, if there was no direct link to PIF (ie they are private companies) and / or there are multiple bids then there is no issue under the rules. KSA companies could have done this at any time. I imagine you won't find many Saudi companies large enough to sponsor a major PL team without ties to PIF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Monday at 21:54 Share Posted Monday at 21:54 2 minutes ago, Unbelievable said: Like anyone else on here you have no idea what PIF have or haven't done with regards to sponsorhip, nor what the PL have done to block deals. I imagine you won't find many Saudi companies large enough to sponsor a major PL team without ties to PIF. The PL cannot block sponsorship deals which pass both the APT and FMV rules. Simply not true - ‘ties’ don’t matter. KSA has a significant private sector. The rules are absolutely clear - they are pretty much standard procurement rules for proving FMV; multiple quotes. Any idea that PIF couldn’t leverage this is daft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted Monday at 21:55 Share Posted Monday at 21:55 1 hour ago, Chris L said: I swear that’s one of burnsie’s 500 accounts/personalities. Layout of the tweets are the same. If it is him. I’d take tweet this with a pinch of salt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT24 Posted Monday at 22:07 Share Posted Monday at 22:07 11 minutes ago, LFEE said: Aye the information is readily available on LinkedIn too. It definitely happened and was posted by the people there. No need for ITK-nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now