Jack27 Posted Monday at 17:15 Share Posted Monday at 17:15 Let’s sign some questionable sponsorships while nobody is watching Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted Monday at 17:24 Share Posted Monday at 17:24 6 minutes ago, Jack27 said: Let’s sign some questionable sponsorships while nobody is watching It's NUFC, a northern club owned by the Saudis with enough money to blow the cartel clubs out of the water given a free hand. The PL were watching even before we signed any questionable deals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Monday at 17:25 Share Posted Monday at 17:25 I'm up for a few Man U type sponsorship deals, do we even have an official toothpick sponsor Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Tuesday at 10:38 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:38 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Tuesday at 10:49 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:49 So in reality, fuck all to do with us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted Tuesday at 10:51 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:51 12 minutes ago, gdm said: Fucking Martin Ziegler again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted Tuesday at 10:53 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:53 Quote Although the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which owns Newcastle, would not be part of any purchase, there could be enough of a link that would result in Monaco being viewed by Uefa as part of a multi-club ownership (MCO) structure with Newcastle. It says that Nice & Girona are being run as a "blind trust" which basically means being run completely independently of Man Utd and Man City respectively. Although they do literally have the same owners so it's not exactly the same. But that doesn't fit the "Big, bad Newcastle out to ruin football" narrative... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted Tuesday at 11:02 Share Posted Tuesday at 11:02 Yes Girona are completely independent of Man City, just ask Savio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Tuesday at 11:05 Share Posted Tuesday at 11:05 11 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: It says that Nice & Girona are being run as a "blind trust" which basically means being run completely independently of Man Utd and Man City respectively. Although they do literally have the same owners so it's not exactly the same. But that doesn't fit the "Big, bad Newcastle out to ruin football" narrative... New rules incoming.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted Tuesday at 11:07 Share Posted Tuesday at 11:07 Be funny if/when the premier league start to shit it when players start leaving for the continent when clubs can’t afford wages and transfer fees (see Olise situation). Rules would soon change then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted Tuesday at 11:09 Share Posted Tuesday at 11:09 Aren’t Girona 50% owned by Pare Guardiola (Peps Bro)? Can Andy Howe not just buy a stake in Monaco? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted Tuesday at 12:00 Share Posted Tuesday at 12:00 So we’re not even allowed to set up a MCO? Blimey Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted Tuesday at 12:02 Share Posted Tuesday at 12:02 Fold the club. No point in even trying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted Tuesday at 12:22 Share Posted Tuesday at 12:22 So they can afford another club but can't afford Calvert-Lewin? Ermmm priorities much!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted Tuesday at 12:40 Share Posted Tuesday at 12:40 Key line in the article seems to be this... Quote Although the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which owns Newcastle, would not be part of any purchase, there could be enough of a link that would result in Monaco being viewed by Uefa as part of a multi-club ownership (MCO) structure with Newcastle. How can it be a problem then, if the PIF, our owners are 'not part of any purchase'??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted Tuesday at 13:41 Share Posted Tuesday at 13:41 59 minutes ago, TK-421 said: Key line in the article seems to be this... How can it be a problem then, if the PIF, our owners are 'not part of any purchase'??? Despite the countless occasions of the sky 6 using their feeder clubs they are genuinely shit scared of things we have nothing to do with. Meanwhile the sky 6 continues to do what they are scared we will do 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likelylad Posted Tuesday at 13:51 Share Posted Tuesday at 13:51 It's obviously more understated these days but there's a real active anger/frustration both in the media and from other clubs that our takeover went through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Tuesday at 15:57 Share Posted Tuesday at 15:57 I’ve no issue with MCO being blocked in Europe tbh. Obviously that should also apply to clubs who already are in one, too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted Wednesday at 17:10 Share Posted Wednesday at 17:10 get sponsoring, Yasir!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted yesterday at 04:14 Share Posted yesterday at 04:14 Did Man City win their case ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted yesterday at 04:24 Share Posted yesterday at 04:24 8 minutes ago, Ben said: Did Man City win their case ? We don’t know the verdict yet. It’s also interesting that we were meant to have more sponsors lined up but still nothing has been announced I wonder if these two issues are related. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted yesterday at 05:22 Share Posted yesterday at 05:22 55 minutes ago, r0cafella said: We don’t know the verdict yet. It’s also interesting that we were meant to have more sponsors lined up but still nothing has been announced I wonder if these two issues are related. I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted yesterday at 05:32 Share Posted yesterday at 05:32 10 minutes ago, et tu brute said: I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. Makes sense as it’s basically lawyers who wouldn’t want to risk leaking anything for obvious reasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted yesterday at 06:01 Share Posted yesterday at 06:01 37 minutes ago, et tu brute said: I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. 27 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Makes sense as it’s basically lawyers who wouldn’t want to risk leaking anything for obvious reasons. Had it gone really well for the Premier League, you would think leaks would have came out from the usual suspects, so I’m hoping the silence means it has gone badly for the sly fuckers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted yesterday at 06:04 Share Posted yesterday at 06:04 2 minutes ago, nufcnick said: Had it gone really well for the Premier League, you would think leaks would have came out from the usual suspects, so I’m hoping the silence means it has gone badly for the sly fuckers Fingers crossed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now