Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't understand why we never really rotate based on opposition, isn't that a quite normal thing to do when you have the players to do so? We've improved our squad depth last season, but we're not really taking full advantage of it imo. For example Burn automatically playing at LB every single game over Tino, even when he was bound to get bullied by a fast winger. We're playing Longstaff over Tonali in games where we're likely to have the ball quite a lot. What is the tactical reasoning behind that?

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Erikse said:

I don't understand why we never really rotate based on opposition, isn't that a quite normal thing to do when you have the players to do so? We've improved our squad depth last season, but we're not really taking full advantage of it imo. For example Burn automatically playing at LB every single game over Tino, even when he was bound to get bullied by a fast winger. We're playing Longstaff over Tonali in games where we're likely to have the ball quite a lot. What is the tactical reasoning behind that?

 

 

 

 

Doesn't like to change an undefeated team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think in many ways he was let down tonight by individual errors similar to the Chelsea game. Kelly a catastrophe.

 

But the second half was a train wreck with long spells of players not looking like they knew what position they were meant to be playing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That wasn't great, at all. Can't put it all on Eddie of course but it turned into an absolute muddle after about 50 minutes and was still very much salvageable even at 0-2, but it was a proper mess. Created nowt of note other than the pen shout in the second half, not enough quality or goal threat at all. A shit show of a second half, so many passes over or under hit.

 

In a display with hardly any quality from us whatsoever, centre half and right wing looked absolutely minging in particular and just highlighted our pathetic summer window not for the first time this season. Doesn't help himself by holding back Tonali, like. Corners and set pieces routinely awful from an attacking perspective yet again. Whatever work is being done on these through the week isn't effective enough.

 

Free transfer or not, if Lloyd Kelly is Howe's man it only strengths the argument that he shouldn't have the keys to the kingdom and needs to work in the structure we're setting up.

 

We can't afford to fuck up too many more of these home games after this and Brighton. You'll get the odd result like this or shitty draw but if we start losing to the non-top-6 teams too often we'll be looking at another lower midtable finish again.

 

Hopefully one to forget about quickly and a reality check we can use to propel us into the next few games, but it was really shit and Eddie should rightly be fuming with some aspects of it, and take some of the flak for it also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same old, same old with Howe.

 

On 28/09/2024 at 14:47, Beren said:

Good performance, good result. I want to see if this sticks.

 

Think it's a bit easier in some ways to show that kind of intensity against Man City. Want to see it vs a Fulham or an Everton.

 

Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City - you'll see performances to be proud of most of the time.

 

There's more Everton, Fulham and West Ham fixtures in the season though. Had hoped the Forest game was a turning-the-corner moment. Alas, two steps forward...

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he first came one of his biggest strengths was that he'd studied the modern game with Atletico and really seemed to have his finger on the button with regards to the gegenpress. But football has evolved in the last two seasons. Every top team has a number 10 and can open up teams that play a low block (which is anyone we play who isn't one of the top teams). He doesn't seem to be evolving this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Butcher said:

Just too limited. Plan A is the only plan. It's great when it works. More or less useless when it doesn't.

 

Reckon the board and Mitchell will have a list of potential replacements drawn up?

No, I don’t think we are a that proactive tbh. Not that it’s time to start talking about him getting sacked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

Doesn't like to change an undefeated team. 

 

Seems like it, but the whole Burn thing was every game regardless of result and performance. Will be interesting to see whether we make a change for the next one. Generally I'd like the lineups to be a little more proactive.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Erikse said:

 

Seems like it, but the whole Burn thing was every game regardless of result and performance. Will be interesting to see if we make a change for the next one.

Would imagine it will be the usual Barnes for Willock and Tonali for Longstaff. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...