Nobody Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 25 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said: Hence the word ‘accepting’. There should have already been signings. It’s pathetic that there hasn’t been. We survived last year because of individual quality and one of them isn’t even here anymore. Accepting that there won’t be any movement before August is part of the problem. There should be hell on. There isn’t. Great result for Ashley. So what are you doing about it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, Nobody said: So what are you doing about it? Not attending matches. Packed in my ST after not missing a game for many years. Attempting to join in whatever protest/movement that is available. Encouraging protest, hopeful that one day NUST will listen to their fans and grow a backbone. Refusing to purchase anything from the club shop (or where known, any of Ashley’s tat shops), although I may accidentally due to his wide ever spanning portfolio. Let me know if I can do anything else, I’d be delighted to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 1 minute ago, Fantail Breeze said: Not attending matches. Packed in my ST after not missing a game for many years. Attempting to join in whatever protest/movement that is available. Encouraging protest, hopeful that one day NUST will listen to their fans and grow a backbone. Refusing to purchase anything from the club shop (or where known, any of Ashley’s tat shops), although I may accidentally due to his wide ever spanning portfolio. Let me know if I can do anything else, I’d be delighted to. Pretty sure Stifler doesn't go to any games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 14 minutes ago, Nobody said: Pretty sure Stifler doesn't go to any games. I packed my season ticket let in. I was involved in protest groups, and don’t buy from Ashley’s companies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Toon Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Shouldn't be allowed to loan players without the intention of buying them IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 8 hours ago, Yorkie said: Who the fuck is this charlatan on about? Those kids? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Convinced Fantail Breeze was a previous user. Similar posting style to Figures 1-0 Football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 1 minute ago, joeyt said: Convinced Fantail Breeze was a previous user. Similar posting style to Figures 1-0 Football He has to be. He was going on about Tubes a couple of days ago. He’s been gone for donkeys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 It's awful but I loved the Fanny Breeze piss pulling name, whoever came up with that, it sounds like a Gwinith Paltrow air freshener Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 3 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said: You just know Willock will be Kenedy mark II. Well he’s never going to repeat the impact he had last time. Will still be an asset though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Willock-Hayden is a decent central midfield pairing under the right manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Buzzing for us to be starting the season with the same midfield pairing we had in the championship five years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 2 hours ago, reefatoon said: He has to be. He was going on about Tubes a couple of days ago. He’s been gone for donkeys. He’s had about 30 accounts on here Has he ever left? Anyone who had browsed the forum for even the last 12 months would know all about tubes. 2 hours ago, joeyt said: Convinced Fantail Breeze was a previous user. Similar posting style to Figures 1-0 Football Incorrect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 Exactly what Figures 1-0 Football would say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 13 minutes ago, Tomato Deuce said: Exactly what Figures 1-0 Football would say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 I don't really mind Fanny tbh, i think he makes some valid points, but i'm surprised if he hasn't been under a different name in the past. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collingwood Street Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 20 minutes ago, Sima said: Buzzing for us to be starting the season with the same midfield pairing we had in the championship five years ago. Need a Batty/McCreery type in the middle. Haven’t had one for years. Hopefully we can get Willock and someone else up front. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abra Dubravka Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 4 hours ago, Away Toon said: Shouldn't be allowed to loan players without the intention of buying them IMO. Half agree, should definitely be a case that if X games played an agreed fee is met, and clause sets in. Especially loaning within PL. I think it’s pathetic we’re constantly loaning in players, especially from so called ‘big clubs’. Willock, Kenedy, all the rumours last few years of Holding, Abraham. Whilst Willock was superb, I’ll never accept my club loaning in young players just so they can develop, and parent club can benefit - financially, or getting a better player back with no long term gain earned on our end. Where not Roda JC, historically we’re a decent Premier League club. Time we started acting like one, Takeover or no-Takeover. Even Burnley, Brighton or Sheff U don’t/didnt go sniffing butthole for Phil Jones or Rob Holding on a handout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 You shouldn’t be allowed to loan players from other PL clubs at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 (edited) 13 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: You shouldn’t be allowed to loan players from other PL clubs at all. There is definitely a conflict of interest going on. Edited July 13, 2021 by ToonArmy1892 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abra Dubravka Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 1 minute ago, ToonArmy1892 said: There is definitely a conflict of interests going on. Not sure if same ruling exists nowadays, but in Italy, Spain players can play against each other. Even in PL, loan players can’t play against ‘own team’ but they can affect results for/against loanee/loan team. Especially within recent years, the loan market within the PL has been to offload players to anyone but ‘top 6’, either to hopefully develop the player for a season to increase his market interest/value (Willock, Sam Gallagher..) or just generally alleviate wage bill costs on players new management doesn’t want. The last loan deal I saw that was really successful, for player and both clubs - Ben White to Leeds, from Brighton. Leeds didn’t get screwed, prepared to pay £30M for him. Brighton got a PL ready player, and Ben White developed into a England international. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 6 hours ago, Abra Dubravka said: Even in PL, loan players can’t play against ‘own team’ but they can affect results for/against loanee/loan team. All the loanees from bigger clubs also means that - along with all their other advantages - bigger clubs are getting to play multiple smaller clubs in depleted forms - e.g. Arsenal getting us without one of our best players. It's a racket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 That works both ways though? For example Loftus-Cheek could play against Arsenal but not Chelsea, while Willock could play against Chelsea but not Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 11 hours ago, joeyt said: Convinced Fantail Breeze was a previous user. Similar posting style to Figures 1-0 Football And I’ve got a feeling his comedic sidekick Joey Linton is Luke Edwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts