Realistic Transfer Targets (2025/26)

[Froggy]

8 hours ago, SweMag said:

He’s on 120k/w.

 

No he's not. He's on exactly what I said he's on.

[The Butcher]

The arrogance

[Menace]

6am and his team just lost a cup final - cut him some slack. Changed his photo a few times already too.

[NSG]

10 minutes ago, Menace said:

6am and his team just lost a cup final - cut him some slack. Changed his photo a few times already too.

Just noticed he has nearly 36,000 posts on this forum in 15 years  

 

That’s a bit of an obsession. 

[KingArthur]

29 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

No he's not. He's on exactly what I said he's on.

No one really knows the wages mate.

[Froggy]

30 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

The arrogance

 

From SweMag telling me what Man United players are earning?  Agreed.

 

2 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

No one really knows the wages mate.

 

Sometimes this is the case. We can see our wage outgoings on our accounts though and most of our players wages are sourced well. Hojlund's is accurate.

[Froggy]

16 minutes ago, NSG said:

Just noticed he has nearly 36,000 posts on this forum in 15 years  

 

That’s a bit of an obsession. 

 

It's a good forum, with some whoppers on it.

 

27 minutes ago, Menace said:

6am and his team just lost a cup final - cut him some slack. Changed his photo a few times already too.

 

No, someone changed my photo for me.  I changed it back.

 

I'm in work now, which is when I post. 

[Nucasol]

16 hours ago, Rich said:

Two of Juventus, Lazio, and Roma will be added to this, too. Quite a few in here you'd think could be a fit, though I appreciate an equal number wouldn't.

Cheeky bid for L.Kelly? Too soon?

[KingArthur]

2 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

From SweMag telling me what Man United players are earning?  Agreed.

 

 

Sometimes this is the case. We can see our wage outgoings on our accounts though and most of our players wages are sourced well. Hojlund's is accurate.

If these are from the accounts. shouldn't ALL the players' wages be 100 % certain? You can see every player's wage if you can see the actual accounts.

[Nucasol]

Just now, Froggy said:

 

It's a good forum, with some whoppers on it.

 

 

No, someone changed my photo for me.  I changed it back.

 

I'm in work now, which is when I post. 

Froggster coming out swinging this morning

 

[Froggy]

3 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

If these are from the accounts. shouldn't ALL the players' wages be 100 % certain? You can see every player's wage if you can see the actual accounts.

 

No, you can't see individual wages. But you can see the full wage outgoings, and it can be cross-referenced fairly easily with the reported salaries, especially when there's 3 or 4 tier 1 sources reporting the same thing.

 

Anyway, this isn't important.

[WilliamPS]

Man Utd have incredibly low player salaries as they are such a well managed club with earnest players, unfortunately they have been the victim of the greediest tea ladies, kit men, receptionists and cleaners in world football, thankfully Sir Jim is sorting those bastards out

[KingArthur]

7 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

No, you can't see individual wages. But you can see the full wage outgoings, and it can be cross-referenced fairly easily with the reported salaries, especially when there's 3 or 4 tier 1 sources reporting the same thing.

 

Anyway, this isn't important.

What are these tier 1 sources? Please don't say Capology. 

 

And it is not important, but the wages really are not public.

[Froggy]

Just now, KingArthur said:

What are these tier 1 sources? Please don't say Capology. 

 

And it is not important, but the wages really are not public.

 

Capology isn't a source itself, it "verifies" a wage based on other sources. 

 

We can agree to disagree and everyone can just continue to trust these sources for good or evil when the argument suits them.  

[Ben]

9 minutes ago, WilliamPS said:

Man Utd have incredibly low player salaries as they are such a well managed club with earnest players, unfortunately they have been the victim of the greediest tea ladies, kit men, receptionists and cleaners in world football, thankfully Sir Jim is sorting those bastards out

 

Darn Tootin 

[r0cafella]

Capology is nonsense for players salaries and should be ignored. 

[KingArthur]

16 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Capology isn't a source itself, it "verifies" a wage based on other sources. 

 

We can agree to disagree and everyone can just continue to trust these sources for good or evil when the argument suits them.  

As a rule, you shouldn't trust these sources. Most likely they are guessing.  

But yea, not important. 

[Froggy]

12 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Capology is nonsense for players salaries and should be ignored. 

 

Everyone loved Capology until it stated that Lloyd Kelly was on £150,000 a week.

[SweMag]

2 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

No he's not. He's on exactly what I said he's on.

No he’s not. He’s on 120k/w. And that’s according to reliable media in Denmark who’s close to Anders Hojlund and SEG.

 

[Froggy]

2 minutes ago, SweMag said:

No he’s not. He’s on 120k/w. And that’s according to reliable media in Denmark who’s close to Anders Hojlund and SEG.

 

 

I'll trust the reliable sources of Manchester United cheers.

[Conjo]

Ain't no way a player that cost £64-75m is on anything less than £100k a week, especially for a club like man utf. I don't care even if Højlund posts a screenshot of his taxes or pay slip that contradicts it.

[Optimistic Nut]

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Everyone loved Capology until it stated that Lloyd Kelly was on £150,000 a week.

 

Think it was the Targett one that made it look bollocks, mind. Think it's accurate for US sports where these sorts of things are in the public domain but for football it's basically relying on newspaper sources.