Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

Don’t be a dick all your life. I simply can’t find them now. And as I state, it’s only Edwards that says it’s off. 
 

still waiting for your rebuttal of PIF having walked away which you attributed to our lawyers by the way, which was utter nonsense….

 

Sounds like Edwards is right then.

 

It was a statement made during the court hearing last year, read the previous takeover thread and you’ll see the many, many comments stating it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fantail Breeze said:

 

Sounds like Edwards is right then.

 

It was a statement made during the court hearing last year, read the previous takeover thread and you’ll see the many, many comments stating it. 

No, they said that the offer from PIF may not be the same as once agreed. Not that they had left the table. I quoted it verbatim to you. But as usual, when wrong, you ignore the truth to suit your agenda. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Manxst said:

No, they said that the offer from PIF may not be the same as once agreed. Not that they had left the table. I quoted it verbatim to you. But as usual, when wrong, you ignore the truth to suit your agenda. 

 

Here is just one of the many news reports stating it:

 

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/19614035.newcastles-lawyers-took-premier-league-competition-appeals-tribunal/

 

“We say this lobbying distorted the Premier League’s fair and objective application of the rules. The result of all of this is that PIF pulled out of the takeover.”

 

Found the sources from last night yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fantail Breeze said:

 

Here is just one of the many news reports stating it:

 

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/19614035.newcastles-lawyers-took-premier-league-competition-appeals-tribunal/

 

“We say this lobbying distorted the Premier League’s fair and objective application of the rules. The result of all of this is that PIF pulled out of the takeover.”

 

Found the sources from last night yet?

They literally went to arbitration and said they hadn’t pulled out though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

They literally went to arbitration and said they hadn’t pulled out though.

Mike literally went to try and get damages because he couldn’t agree the deal would be the same, not that they’d pulled out. Fanny is clutching onto Luke’s coattails like he did during the takeover/Mauriss. We’ll be getting Joey soon… 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

They literally went to arbitration and said they hadn’t pulled out though.

 

 

They said they would potentially come back to the deal if there was a route to the deal happening.

 

The only route to that deal was the piracy - and as I’ve said many times, aligns with the views of Edwards, Jacobs etc.

 

It’s all largely irrelevant, the discussion was about Edwards’ credential as a journalist which appear to be slightly higher than Manxst’s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

Mike literally went to try and get damages because he couldn’t agree the deal would be the same, not that they’d pulled out. Fanny is clutching onto Luke’s coattails like he did during the takeover/Mauriss. We’ll be getting Joey soon… 

 

Have you found those other sources yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fantail Breeze said:

 

:lol: Clutching at straws there. They’re always on the money with Newcastle transfer news IIRC.

They’re an Italian source dealing with an Italian club. About as reliable as your beloved Luke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scotia1997 said:

 

New on this fourm mate, I'm from Glasgow. Hadn't read back of previous pages. Seen the deal was kinda close wasn't sure how close though.

 

:thup: Welcome mate.

 

According to Edwards (and the other tweet just posted on here), it’s off.

 

Frustrating imo, hopefully we get a LB in soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

How many frustrated with the Bakker deal supposedly being off have seen him play ?

 

Not so much him specifically (although what I saw of him looked quality) but more the continuation of deals being on then off again.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Manxst said:

They’re an Italian source dealing with an Italian club. About as reliable as your beloved Luke.

 

I couldn’t really care less about Edwards, tbh.

 

I just think it’s really embarrassing when a journalist posts a negative story they are pulled up as wrong, fake, etc.

 

The same journalist posts good news and it’s accepted as fact.

 

It’s very RTG, magedia etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...