Jump to content

Bruno Guimarães


Fantail Breeze

Recommended Posts

Arsenal haven't been big spenders historically - they then splurged on Rice, Havertz & Timber last summer. If they're going to sign someone from us it isn't going to be Bruno.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

Arsenal haven't been big spenders historically - they then splurged on Rice, Havertz & Timber last summer. If they're going to sign someone from us it isn't going to be Bruno.

Spent £72m on Nicolas Pepe a few years ago, lest we forget. Aubameyang, Lacazette also both around the £50m mark. It's not as sustained as Man City or Chelsea but they do have form for forking out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Parsley said:

Spent £72m on Nicolas Pepe a few years ago, lest we forget. Aubameyang, Lacazette also both around the £50m mark. It's not as sustained as Man City or Chelsea but they do have form for forking out. 

 

Lacazette 2017

Aubameyang 2018

Pepe 2019

Partey 2020

White 2021

Gabriel Jesus 2022

 

Then you've got the radge Rice, Havertz & Timber summer in 2023

Isak 2024

 

Yeah, looks like it's generally one big name per year. Funny how Pepe turned out for them, he was horse shit from day one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

Rumours abound that Liverpool are gunna put a bid in. 
 

Anybody but those cunts.


Mate who supports Liverpool saying the same thing. Fucking hope not. Last place on earth I would want him to end up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BennyBlanco said:

Rumours abound that Liverpool are gunna put a bid in. 
 

Anybody but those cunts.

We’ll get this all summer until the window shuts. He’ll be here for next season. Let them dream. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sima said:

RAWK talking about £70m for him.

 

Aye, right.


Not sure Matteo is old enough to go out on loan. Would be a decent loan fee mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sima said:

RAWK talking about £70m for him.

 

Aye, right.

70m, the thinking from the scouse is the FFP issues we are seemingly have will force us to sell. To be frank just take the points deduction it won’t cost us 30m even if we lose 10 points. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

70m, the thinking from the scouse is the FFP issues we are seemingly have will force us to sell. To be frank just take the points deduction it won’t cost us 30m even if we lose 10 points. 

If thats their thinking then theres nowt to worry about as RAWK dont run Liverpool, thankfully we wont roll over for those entitled nutcases either

Link to post
Share on other sites

TAA is pretty realistic for us with them having a new manager and players not being sure about their playing time. He could learn from Tino and Trippier. About £30m should do it. C*n*s

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sima said:

RAWK talking about £70m for him.

 

Aye, right.

 

If AI took over the world with a view to protect humans at all costs, RAWK would be the first webpage they would shut down. Then theyd nuke Liverpool

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think £80m is realistic considering his age but obviously he's worth more than that to us long term. Hopefully if no one coughs up the alledged £100m release clause he'll be staying......

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beth said:

I think £80m is realistic considering his age but obviously he's worth more than that to us long term. Hopefully if no one coughs up the alledged £100m release clause he'll be staying......

 

:dowiespin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beth said:

I think £80m is realistic considering his age but obviously he's worth more than that to us long term. Hopefully if no one coughs up the alledged £100m release clause he'll be staying......

 

He's 26 years old :lol:

 

Beth have you ever considered badminton instead?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KaKa said:

 

He's 26 years old :lol:

 

Beth have you ever considered badminton instead?

 

We've probably only got about 8 years left to sell him then. Maybe £70m is fair after all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool is the last destination I could ever imagine Bruno leaving for. I think that club are about to go get a shock, I think their post-Klopp odyssey might not be as fruitful as they expect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Novocastrian said:

Liverpool is the last destination I could ever imagine Bruno leaving for. I think that club are about to go get a shock, I think their post-Klopp odyssey might not be as fruitful as they expect.

 

Yeah, with Klopp gone and such big changes, the pull won't be the same at the minute.

 

Similarly with Pep now expected to leave in a couple of years, and with all the drama around city with this conflict with the Premier League, and the 115 charges, not sure the pull for City is quite the same either.

 

Think Bruno stays. Unless someone big from abroad comes in for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Beth said:

I think £80m is realistic considering his age but obviously he's worth more than that to us long term. Hopefully if no one coughs up the alledged £100m release clause he'll be staying......

360486D2-0DFE-484C-97CF-52AB1646AA31.gif.c6f733edaae41975ca5724322c29ed32.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...