gjohnson Posted Wednesday at 17:51 Share Posted Wednesday at 17:51 1 hour ago, Froggy said: I never said it wasn't crass mind. At the end of the day there's going to be a lot of people out of a job. My point is that if there has been a review and the workforce is overinflated, I don't see what people expect a business owner to do. Continue losing £7.5m a year so you're seen as a nice No matter what business it is, when you're paying under performers more in a week than most of these 250 will see in 10 years, then it doesn't really suggest they're the problem Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted Wednesday at 17:59 Share Posted Wednesday at 17:59 6 minutes ago, gjohnson said: No matter what business it is, when you're paying under performers more in a week than most of these 250 will see in 10 years, then it doesn't really suggest they're the problem Nope, but what footballers are getting paid isn't Jim Ratcliffe's fault either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCK Posted Wednesday at 18:07 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:07 Froggy and Jim up a tree... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted Wednesday at 18:10 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:10 2 minutes ago, OCK said: Froggy and Jim up a tree... W-I-N-N-I-N-G Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Wednesday at 18:11 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:11 Just now, Froggy said: W-I-N-N-I-N-G This is a quality line in fairness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted Wednesday at 18:12 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:12 7 minutes ago, Froggy said: Nope, but what footballers are getting paid isn't Jim Ratcliffe's fault either. Maybe not but he's choosing to sacrifice the ones who probably need the wage most to subsidise them. Totally typical of modern business practices unfortunately and is common place in every industry....the ones who do the actual work are the easiest to sacrifice. It's not a Man U thing, just a reality of our current economy. With any luck man u will bin the guy who knows all the legacy systems thinking he's just another cog... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Wednesday at 18:16 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:16 5 minutes ago, Froggy said: W-I-N-N-I-N-G Well played Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted Wednesday at 18:16 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:16 6 minutes ago, Froggy said: W-I-N-N-I-N-G Superb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCK Posted Wednesday at 18:29 Share Posted Wednesday at 18:29 Froggy has clearly been bullied a lot. Well played. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted Wednesday at 20:57 Share Posted Wednesday at 20:57 2 hours ago, OCK said: Froggy has clearly been bullied a lot. Well played. Every day on here to be fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted Thursday at 06:47 Share Posted Thursday at 06:47 14 hours ago, Froggy said: I never said it wasn't crass mind. At the end of the day there's going to be a lot of people out of a job. My point is that if there has been a review and the workforce is overinflated, I don't see what people expect a business owner to do. Continue losing £7.5m a year so you're seen as a nice guy? If nigh in a quarter of the workforce has been deemed surplus to requirements, best hope the decision making was correct. Might be the case that a cull like that leads to all sorts of gaps and, paradoxically, inefficiency. The responsible managers, closer to the actual work, might be the ones who face the ‘karma’ for the human cost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Thursday at 08:01 Share Posted Thursday at 08:01 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Thursday at 08:03 Share Posted Thursday at 08:03 Haha I put it in wrong thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Thursday at 14:20 Share Posted Thursday at 14:20 Has Ashworth just confirmed he has been working for Man Utd for ages now ? Ten Hag was confirmed as manager weeks ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted Thursday at 14:27 Share Posted Thursday at 14:27 I recon we've upgraded- cheers Dan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted Thursday at 14:45 Share Posted Thursday at 14:45 24 minutes ago, Ben said: Has Ashworth just confirmed he has been working for Man Utd for ages now ? Ten Hag was confirmed as manager weeks ago Not sure how others feel but after this bloke forgot to switch off to his gmail before sending illicit communications, and now this.... Feeling more and more like we've pulled the wool over ManU's eyes with this one... Mitchell in and an incompetent out for some several million pound profit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted Thursday at 15:09 Share Posted Thursday at 15:09 23 minutes ago, Upthemags said: Not sure how others feel but after this bloke forgot to switch off to his gmail before sending illicit communications, and now this.... Feeling more and more like we've pulled the wool over ManU's eyes with this one... Mitchell in and an incompetent out for some several million pound profit This 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted Thursday at 15:23 Share Posted Thursday at 15:23 34 minutes ago, Upthemags said: Not sure how others feel but after this bloke forgot to switch off to his gmail before sending illicit communications, and now this.... Feeling more and more like we've pulled the wool over ManU's eyes with this one... Mitchell in and an incompetent out for some several million pound profit I don't think email expertise is essential criteria to be a successful sporting director. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionOfGosforth Posted Thursday at 15:25 Share Posted Thursday at 15:25 Just now, Froggy said: I don't think email expertise is essential criteria to be a successful sporting director. Admit it, you're sweating slightly you might have picked the wrong one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted Thursday at 15:26 Share Posted Thursday at 15:26 Man Utd are probably still running on fax. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted Thursday at 15:30 Share Posted Thursday at 15:30 3 minutes ago, LionOfGosforth said: Admit it, you're sweating slightly you might have picked the wrong one Another jammy Southgate run to the final, coinciding with a dodgy ten Hag start to the season, and reality will hit him like a ton of bricks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted Thursday at 15:44 Share Posted Thursday at 15:44 The only way I could see him writing that is if the agreement for compensation included a clause such that we would not go after him for communicating with ManUtd during his employment here. If the agreement included that the compensation amount would have reflected it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted Thursday at 15:47 Share Posted Thursday at 15:47 1 minute ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: The only way I could see him writing that is if the agreement for compensation included a clause such that we would not go after him for communicating with ManUtd during his employment here. If the agreement included that the compensation amount would have reflected it. Yeah, I’m sure that the final compensation accounted for the breach of contract and compensated with agreement for no further litigation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted Thursday at 15:48 Share Posted Thursday at 15:48 1 hour ago, Ben said: Has Ashworth just confirmed he has been working for Man Utd for ages now ? Ten Hag was confirmed as manager weeks ago I think the we is used as meaning Manchester United football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Thursday at 15:50 Share Posted Thursday at 15:50 Just now, SAK said: I think the we is used as meaning Manchester United football club. I don't read it that way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now