Dinho lad Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Probably shouldn't have tweeted about it at all really. Fuck me, incredibly poor taste that. IMO, they should suspend him pending police investigation. He'll probably throw a hissy fit, but honestly, fuck him, no player is bigger than the club. Moving dangerously close to Sunderland territory here are Juventus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Juve cashing in on the incel crowd, bold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Probably shouldn't have tweeted about it at all really. Missed the GOP buying Juventus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 You must be the liberals that have dragged down the left in recent years. Fucking hell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimburst Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 You must be the liberals that have dragged down the left in recent years. Fucking hell. I'm sure everyone is concerned with your thoughts on the matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Probably shouldn't have tweeted about it at all really. Possibly the worst worded statement ever released from a football club, that. Reads like they're saying "aye he might've raped someone, but it was 10 years ago, so who cares? He's class at football y'kna?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Gotta love it when English people start hoying 'Liberals' around about people in England as if they have a fucking clue what they're on about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 You must be the liberals that have dragged down the left in recent years. Fucking hell. I'm sure everyone is concerned with your thoughts on the matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Tbf I don’t think they’ve meant it to come across as it has, it’s just the first line of the 2nd tweet is worded absolutely horrifically Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Gotta love it when English people start hoying 'Liberals' around about people in England as if they have a fucking clue what they're on about. You are unbelievably tedious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Probably shouldn't have tweeted about it at all really. Possibly the worst worded statement ever released from a football club, that. Reads like they're saying "aye he might've raped someone, but it was 10 years ago, so who cares? He's class at football y'kna?" I think KI's last post here is more applicable to you, actually. Maybe I shouldn't have been too harsh on KI. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Nike and EA will be bricking it as well, Nike can easily drop him but EA have him on every cover of the world's most popular sports game during their launch campaign. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimburst Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Careful KI, you might yet again be accused of being part of the shadowy cabal of Forum Users Inexplicably Aligned Against Dinho Lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Careful KI, you might yet again be accused of being part of the shadowy cabal of Forum Users Inexplicably Aligned Against Dinho Lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Careful KI, you might yet again be accused of being part of the shadowy cabal of Forum Users Inexplicably Aligned Against Dinho Lad. Just waiting for the next damning audio recording being posted about us all being Liberal Fanboys, putting us all right in our place having FINALLY been told it like it is. The consequences will never be the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Careful KI, you might yet again be accused of being part of the shadowy cabal of Forum Users Inexplicably Aligned Against Dinho Lad. Just waiting for the next damning audio recording being posted about us all being Liberal Fanboys, putting us all right in our place having FINALLY been told it like it is. The consequences will never be the same. Can wait to see the next picture you post claiming to be a lookalike of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rompe Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Yeah, where? What a magazine reports does not count, btw! (Because that's not how it works in the business and legal world, just before you ask why! ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimburst Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Yeah, where? What a magazine reports does not count, btw! (Because that's not how it works in the business and legal world, just before you ask why! ) The second half of the sentence tells you the answer to your question . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rompe Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. They have seen information that is credible to them, Ronaldo has pretty much admitted rape to his lawyers. Yeah, where? What a magazine reports does not count, btw! (Because that's not how it works in the business and legal world, just before you ask why! ) http://www.spiegel.de/international/cristiano-ronaldo-kathryn-mayorga-the-woman-who-accuses-ronaldo-of-rape-a-1230634-2.html In response to the question as to whether Ms. C. ever raised her voice, screamed or called out, X responded, according to the document: "She said no and stop several times." In the document, X says that she was lying on her side. "I entered her from behind. It was rude. We didn't change position. 5/7 minutes. She said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available." And further: "But she kept saying 'No.' 'Don't do it.' 'I'm not like the others.' I apologized afterwards." That's from Ronaldo himself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 Because if they didn't, they'd look as if they're not backing their player. (Which would be awkward between CR7 and them if he turns out to be innocent) Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted October 5, 2018 Share Posted October 5, 2018 How how to you come to the conclusion that Juventus have deemed this to be 'credible', then? Also, as I mentioned, just because some magazine have reported it doesn't mean that Juventus have to treat it as a legitimate source of information! Maybe if the paperwork was directly sent to them by the woman's lawyer, then I can understand. But at the moment there's nothing to suggest that Juventus have been approached by lawyers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts