Dr Venkman Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 5 hours ago, STM said: Newcastle fans: Sign some players damn you. *Newcastle start to make some moves* Newcastle fans: Woah there, you aren't planning on selling someone are you? Can you cunts not enjoy anything at all. Perhaps we are, you know, trying to improve the squad for next season. Spot on mate. I don’t see why we would have to sell anyone to fund a couple of buys which are around 120m total. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, The College Dropout said: Banter aside I understand the business of football and the game itself better than most. According to who? Steve Bruce managed 1000 games lest we forget. It’s a good job you’re so humble otherwise you’d come across like a right prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said: Spot on mate. I don’t see why we would have to sell anyone to fund a couple of buys which are around 120m total. We'll not be selling any starters. Not a chance Gordon goes as an example. Edited June 7 by Super Duper Branko Strupar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, Ben said: I don't have a fucking clue Never stopped you before, Ben, wade in lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 That Sam C is reliable fwiw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 (edited) Player wants to come then. Problem will be Brighton. Edited June 7 by nufc123 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 (edited) 2 minutes ago, nufc123 said: Player wants to to come then. Problem will be Brighton. Aye, problem will be agreeing a reasonable fee, no issue with them wanting to sell. That’s what they do. Edited June 7 by SUPERTOON Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 We know they want him out because of disciplinary issues. Should help with the fee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, gbandit said: We know they want him out because of disciplinary issues. Should help with the fee Just about to sign a replacement as well apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Wonder what Howe's thinking behind this is in terms of our no dickheads rule. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Wasn't he more or less signed, before he joined Brighton, but we pulled out when Watford started dicking around with the fee? Shame, would have cost around half the price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Just now, Kid Icarus said: Wonder what Howe's thinking behind this is in terms of our no dickheads rule. Was about to ask. Must’ve passed the test last time we were in for him. How’s his English? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Just now, The Prophet said: Wasn't he more or less signed, before he joined Brighton, but we pulled out when Watford started dicking around with the fee? Shame, would have cost around half the price. Yeah, although not sure if that was the reason. Most reports I've read are that Wilson's injury made us have a rethink of our priorities, combined with us being urged to 'go big' by PIF before signing Isak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said: Yeah, although not sure if that was the reason. Most reports I've read are that Wilson's injury made us have a rethink of our priorities, combined with us being urged to 'go big' by PIF before signing Isak. Thought the reports at the time were that we wanted both. Can't really remember though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 7 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Wasn't he more or less signed, before he joined Brighton, but we pulled out when Watford started dicking around with the fee? Shame, would have cost around half the price. We went for Isak instead if I remember correctly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 I'm not keen on him but I suppose he did thump Van Hecke in training, so I'm warming to the idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 52 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said: Spot on mate. I don’t see why we would have to sell anyone to fund a couple of buys which are around 120m total. Because 120m is most of our budget, and we need more than 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, The College Dropout said: Think JP goes some way to address that. Would stilll get in 1 body though. But if we plan to play 2 in midfield frequently it’s less of an issue. You would expect JP to start 80% of games meaning 1 of the midfield 3 or Isak gets a rest. I dont believe a second that Howe changes his system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 8 minutes ago, Ashley17 said: I'm not keen on him but I suppose he did thump Van Hecke in training, so I'm warming to the idea. He’s been getting a lot of negative press for this but to me it sounds like a reasonable thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 9 minutes ago, KingArthur said: I dont believe a second that Howe changes his system. It’s the only way spending £50m+ on JP makes sense. JP best position is at 10/second striker. Why would you spend so much money on him and play him in a position that’s not his best? It also puts the Cunha links into context. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Think no matter what combo you go with our midfield will struggle in a 2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, nemtizz said: Think no matter what combo you go with our midfield will struggle in a 2. I mean if someone can do it its Bruno and Tonali. Both are at the top of distance covered stats. Never stops running(well if you can call what Bruno does running). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 (edited) 17 minutes ago, KingArthur said: Because 120m is most of our budget, and we need more than 2. Yeah I’ll rephrase that. I don’t see why we should have to sell anyone effective. Edited June 7 by Dr Venkman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Aye, looking at some fag packet maths, it seems like we'd need a sale or two to fund Pedro and Elanga. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 7 Share Posted June 7 Luckily for us Forest will ask for way more money than we are prepared to pay. Thank God! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now