Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Geogaddi]

I would be stunned and also disappointed in the club if we sell Isak this summer mind . We hold all the power with 3 years left on his contract. Even if he kicks up a fuss which I don't think he will we still should be saying no and making him give us another season. Not a lot we can do next summer with only two years left but it sends out the totally wrong message about our ambitions etc if we sell him this window.

[Loki679]

He doesn't seem the type to kick up a fuss and try and force a move.

[gdm]

7 minutes ago, Rich said:

Would people rather sell Isak for £150M and sign Ekitike for £80M, or sign Isak up to a new contract and not get Ekitike at all?

Sigh Isak up 

[GWN]

fuck me we are the richest club in the world, show it ! 

 

Sign them both up 

[Dr.Spaceman]

8 minutes ago, Rich said:

Would people rather sell Isak for £150M and sign Ekitike for £80M, or sign Isak up to a new contract and not get Ekitike at all?

 

You have to ask, really 

[HayDen Traces]

I was thinking about what we could/should be offering him on his new contract... 

£250k p/w and a £10m signing bonus which is spread out over the term of the contract? 

It's comfortably our highest paid but not so far ahead of Bruno etc?

[Shadow Puppets]

1 minute ago, HayDen Traces said:

I was thinking about what we could/should be offering him on his new contract... 

£250k p/w and a £10m signing bonus which is spread out over the term of the contract? 

It's comfortably our highest paid but not so far ahead of Bruno etc?

How does that affect PSR?

[HayDen Traces]

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:

How does that affect PSR?

Not a clue man. Just wanted to get the discussion started

[r0cafella]

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:

How does that affect PSR?

I think the point is we could essentially give him a new contract which would reduce his amortization and it's essentially free in accounting terms as we've stretched the amortisation over a longer period. 

[Maggies]

2 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

How does that affect PSR?

He has book value of £31m left which is roughly £10m per year.

 

Extending by 2 years brings the £31m to £6.2m per year.

 

We could offer him a £75k p/week rise without having an affect on PSR.

[GallowgatePigeon]

20 minutes ago, Rich said:

Would people rather sell Isak for £150M and sign Ekitike for £80M, or sign Isak up to a new contract and not get Ekitike at all?

 

Keep Isak every day of the week and twice on a Sunday. 

 

I love the idea of getting both but Isak is simply the best player I've ever seen at Newcastle and a genuine world class talent.

[levelsevenlee]

1 hour ago, Geogaddi said:

That 120 million thing makes no sense at all if you think about it . Liverpool know we won't sell for that and by all accounts have already told them where to go. it's almost as if they are just acting like twats for the sake of it .

 

I thought the bin dippers had hit peak cunt under Klopp, who knew there were still levels to go.

[HayDen Traces]

9 minutes ago, Maggies said:

He has book value of £31m left which is roughly £10m per year.

 

Extending by 2 years brings the £31m to £6.2m per year.

 

We could offer him a £75k p/week rise without having an affect on PSR.

Awesome analysis, cheers mate.

 

That wouldn't put him even on £200k p/w so likely wouldn't be enough to tempt him to resign? 

[JT24]

and Newcastle are right to tell them to fuck off!

[Coffee_Johnny]

1 hour ago, christ said:

I’d like us to retire the term ‘bed wetting’. It’s RTG-coded.

 

Instead can I suggest ‘pant shitting’?

Fair enough, but there might be times when we’re likely to be ‘spending threepence’. Like a deer voiding everything when a pack of wolves are in  hot pursuit! 

[Colos Short and Curlies]

7 minutes ago, HayDen Traces said:

Awesome analysis, cheers mate.

 

That wouldn't put him even on £200k p/w so likely wouldn't be enough to tempt him to resign? 

 

The numbers aren't quite right - they don't include National Insurance (I'll assume no pension!) so it's more like £65k a week

[CheikBoom]

Call their bluff. Pay the fee for Ekitike & plan on keeping Isak. 

[The Prophet]

4 minutes ago, CheikBoom said:

Call their bluff. Pay the fee for Ekitike & plan on keeping Isak. 

 

Isak signs a new deal, unveil both at the same time.

[Skeletor]

2 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Isak signs a new deal, unveil both at the same time.

 

And unveil Trafford at the same time just to send a message to the journos that they know nothing.

[GallowgatePigeon]

26 minutes ago, JT24 said:

and Newcastle are right to tell them to fuck off!

 

WTF kind of a wanky nothing article is this?

 

Wow, well done Liverpool for displaying such mighty courage by enquiring about the availability of the best striker in the world who plays for a club below you in the football food chain before retreating back to your hovel when you find out that the selling club won't be short changed and the player won't agitate for a move.

 

Stunning and brave.

[levelsevenlee]

3 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Isak signs a new deal, unveil both at the same time.

[La Parka]

Tbh, if we get Hugo I expect it's at the cost of Isak. 

 

We need to reinvest that money in the defence though. 

[HayDen Traces]

1 minute ago, La Parka said:

Tbh, if we get Hugo I expect it's at the cost of Isak. 

 

We need to reinvest that money in the defence though. 

If Isak goes we need 2 strikers

[Kid Icarus]

58 minutes ago, Rich said:

Would people rather sell Isak for £150M and sign Ekitike for £80M, or sign Isak up to a new contract and not get Ekitike at all?

I'd be tempted to sell Isak in that scenario if it was to a club abroad. As it's Liverpool though, definitely not.

[Whitley mag]

Yasir is not happy and is very much involved is the word.

 

Expect this touted power play by Liverpool and heralded by their cock sucking journos to look laughable very soon.