Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Alexander Isak - International C*nt

Disco

by Disco
in Football

 Share

Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85

Recommended Posts

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

It’s a kick in the balls if true, but the boy did good for us, our boys upstairs didn’t, good luck to the guy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ben

Ben

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Sima said:

Anyone know how to take a name and number off the back of a shirt?

 

If you bought it from Turkey like I did with my son's, a stiff breeze should do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ponsaelius

ponsaelius

Posted
Posted

Our transfer policy of targeting more high profile 'sure things' to enhance the starting XI was probably in part dictated by our desire to keep him and prove a certain level of ambition.

 

What a mess given the way that has backfired and we have been unable to sign almost anybody.

 

Chances are he was as probably gonna try and leave anyway given it's largely down to the level of salary he could receive elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yorkie

Yorkie

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Shak said:

I wouldn’t be anywhere near as upset about this if we seemed like we had any sort of clue what we are at in the transfer market.

 

We could have had Ekitike as a replacement, probably should have checked at the time if Isak wanted to go.

 

How? Liverpool were always getting him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
gdm

gdm

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

I submitted some Newcastle kits to a YouTube channel to be reviewed. It hasn't aired yet, but... :anguish:

 

11.AwayBack-min.thumb.png.c560f4457b8ccd587a0b8ce2ebae7d1f.png

 

 

He’s signed for Motherwell?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Erikse

Erikse

Posted
Posted (edited)

Wouldn't be surprised if he would be less injured elsewhere. We demand a lot from our striker. Obviously the top clubs would be able to sub him out when necessary aswell. Doesn't change the fact that his injuries were a problem for us at times, mind.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites
bobbydazzla

bobbydazzla

Posted
Posted (edited)

People split up all the time, it happens. Such is life 

 

But refusing to go anywhere with your current girlfriend whilst sitting on the sofa at home sending dick pics to one of her pals that you fancy would be considered very unacceptable behaviour 

 

And the strong suspicion is that Isak’s got his pants round his ankles and phone in hand right now 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites
SUPERTOON

SUPERTOON

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Erikse said:

Wouldn't be surprised if he would be less injured elsewhere. We demand a lot from our striker. Obviously the top clubs would be able to sub him out when necessary aswell. Doesn't change the fact that his injuries were a problem for us at times, mind.

 

 

 

Hope not, hope he misses the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
duo

duo

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

"The rot will set in" ffs. :lol:

 

It's not long ago Torres, Suarez, Alonso, Coutinho etc were moving on to other things from Liverpool. We'll replace him and sign others. 

what are you on about? :burn2:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Green2025

Green2025

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

Liverpool had their initial bid for Wirtz rejected. Just like they also did for Ekitike.

It's just games and negotiation tactics and we fall foul to it. The selling club like to save face. For months, the reports said Ekitike will only be sold for €100m. The actual figure is way less. Bayer and Liverpool reported different figures for Wirtz. What I'm saying is all of that is just noise. Both sides want to look smart. Liverpool will have more than £200m once they sell Diaz, Nunez, Chiesa, Elliott, Doak and Morton. They will bid more than £130m with add-ons.

 

 

Edited by Green2025

Link to post
Share on other sites
Shak

Shak

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

How? Liverpool were always getting him.


Was it not widely speculated that Isak was their first choice target and they’d move on to Ekitike if we didn’t play ball?

 

Or do we not believe that?

Link to post
Share on other sites
ponsaelius

ponsaelius

Posted
Posted (edited)

Personally I'd get Wissa in ASAP and continue focusing on other targets and positions. It's not ideal but given Isak and Wilson's fitness problems last season in the interim we at least have a PL ready CF to start the season and we're not substantially worse off.

 

Dig heals in on Isak, play everything with straight bat, and say he's not being sold this summer under any circumstances. Keep contract offer (up to 200-220k) on the table with an achievable release clause next summer.

 

The optics of selling him to Liverpool this summer are abysmal and go far beyond the short term.

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites
Green2025

Green2025

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Erikse said:

Wouldn't be surprised if he would be less injured elsewhere. We demand a lot from our striker. Obviously the top clubs would be able to sub him out when necessary aswell. Doesn't change the fact that his injuries were a problem for us at times, mind.

 

 

 

Adequate cover in Ekitike that will allow him rest. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Geogaddi

Geogaddi

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, gdm said:

I’m beginning to wonder if Isak was as fucked as we all think after the cup final or is that when this current huff began?

Yep I reckon his head must have been turned even then , clearly wasn't injured as he's had no surgery or anything this summer . He was probably hoping we didn't get champions league to make it easier for him to leave .

 

 

Edited by Geogaddi

Link to post
Share on other sites
Kanj

Kanj

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

Personally I'd get Wissa in ASAP and continue focusing on other targets and positions. It's not ideal but given Isak and Wilson's fitness problems last season in the interim we at least have a PL ready CF to start the season and we're not substantially worse off.

 

Dig heals in on Isak, play everything with straight bat, and say he's not being sold this summer under any circumstances. Keep contract offer (up to 200-220k) on the table with an achievable release clause next summer.

 

The optics of selling him to Liverpool are abysmal and go far beyond the short term.

 

 

 

 

I'd do this, but offer him a 250 to stick around for the year and release or 300 and no release clause, no moving next summer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
KaKa

KaKa

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Green2025 said:

It's just games and negotiation tactics and we fall foul to it. The selling club like to save face. For months, the reports said Ekitike will only be sold for €100m. The actual figure is way less. Bayer and Liverpool reported different figures for Wirtz. What I'm saying is all of that is just noise. Both sides want to look smart. Liverpool will have more than £200m once they sell Diaz, Nunez, Chiesa, Elliott, Doak and Morton. They will bid more than £130m with add-ons.

 

 

 

 

 

man-yawn.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...