Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Pearljam10]

Wait another year before selling. There will be more clubs interested next summer who will push up the price.

[gdm]

A bid will come in for Isak as soon as the middle of next week I guarantee it 

[Pearljam10]

First bid £120

Second bid £120 + 10 

Third bid £130 + 10
 

 

[Displayname]

6 minutes ago, gdm said:

A bid will come in for Isak as soon as the middle of next week I guarantee it 

Have a feeling it's more about us finding a replacement first. 

No way we are going to let Isak go before we have.

[Shak]

Does seem like it would be ideal to sell Isak next summer when we’ll hopefully not be the complete mess we appear to be in terms of recruitment at the moment.

 

If we want to play hardball with him he’s not in the best spot, three years left on his deal means he will probably just have to sack up and get on with it this year.

 

I’d be quite tempted to just insist he’s going nowhere this summer and not offer him any sort of improved deal in the meantime. Sell him next summer, don’t think the market for him is going anywhere.

 

The counterpoint is that Eddie probably doesn’t want an unhappy player in the squad and if he really likes Sesko as the replacement and we can get it done now then maybe just make the move and get it over with.

[gallowghoul]

3 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Have a feeling it's more about us finding a replacement first. 

No way we are going to let Isak go before we have.

My hunch is the isak fee has to be agreed and deal is subject to ins and outs at both clubs, stating the obvious but we can’t agree Wissa and Sesko and keep isak because we can’t agree a fee

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by gallowghoul

[r0cafella]

12 minutes ago, gdm said:

A bid will come in for Isak as soon as the middle of next week I guarantee it 

70m bayern are such mugs. 

[Mattoon]

9 minutes ago, Pearljam10 said:

First bid £120

Second bid £120 + 10 

Third bid £130 + 10
 

 

And I'd turn every one of them down, he's irreplaceable so he commands an irreplaceable fee

[et tu brute]

Just now, Mattoon said:

And I'd turn every one of them down, he's irreplaceable so he commands an irreplaceable fee

They will the Saudis won't be fucked about, it will be £150 plus or he's going nowhere 

[Shearergol]

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:

They will the Saudis won't be fucked about, it will be £150 plus or he's going nowhere 

Sadly I don’t think this is true 

[Mattoon]

Just now, et tu brute said:

They will the Saudis won't be fucked about, it will be £150 plus or he's going nowhere 

This is what I think too, Yassir has made it blatantly clear he doesn't want him to go anywhere so the fee has to be irresistible, not a cut down price on what we value him at.

[Whitley mag]

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:

They will the Saudis won't be fucked about, it will be £150 plus or he's going nowhere 

Agree with this not a chance we sell him for under 150 million. If they want him it’s going to cost them big time.

[r0cafella]

Despite Eddie deflecting id be shocked if anyone else is deciding other than him. He has the final say remember?

[Mattoon]

Just now, r0cafella said:

Despite Eddie deflecting id be shocked if anyone else is deciding other than him. He has the final say remember?

 

It's also reported that Eddie is in lockstep with Yassir over Isak

[r0cafella]

Just now, Mattoon said:

 

It's also reported that Eddie is in lockstep with Yassir over Isak

Let's see how it plays out then. Tough call for them though. 

[et tu brute]

3 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

Sadly I don’t think this is true 

I think it's 100% true. Time will tell

[gallowghoul]

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:

I think it's 100% true. Time will tell

none of these movements would be happening without a fee being pretty clear 

[NEEJ]

Not in the starting line up today. Worrying. 

[et tu brute]

3 minutes ago, gallowghoul said:

none of these movements would be happening without a fee being pretty clear 

You think a fee has been agreed. Sorry I think thats a load of shit 

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by et tu brute

[Ketsbaia]

One worry is that £150m is the online fans' fee but the board have a different opinion, like even £130m would smash the all-time British transfer record by quite a bit.

 

It's certainly a big moment for the Saudi owners, though. To test how serious they are.

 

 

Edited July 27, 2025 by Ketsbaia

[et tu brute]

2 minutes ago, Ketsbaia said:

One worry is that £150m is the online fans' fee but the board have a different opinion, like even £130m would smash the all-time British transfer record by quite a bit.

 

It's certainly a big moment for the Saudi owners, though. To test how serious they are.

 

 

 

It's been reported by several journalists also 

[Nucasol]

Just now, Ketsbaia said:

One worry is that £150m is the online fans' fee but the board have a different opinion, like even £130m would smash the all-time British transfer record.

 

It's certainly a big moment for the Saudi owners, though. To test how serious they are.

If they were that serious they wouldn’t be letting an asset drift rudderless and spending a shitload strengthening rivals. We’re a pocket change investment and a bottom of the list priority when compared with their Clearlake stake and the whole grand scheme around the 2034 World Cup.

 

Even a 5% stake in Clearlake (£60bn overall investments) is worth 10x their initial £300m in NUFC.

[duo]

Anything less than £150 mil and Liverpool have got a steal.

[andycap]

7 minutes ago, Ketsbaia said:

One worry is that £150m is the online fans' fee but the board have a different opinion, like even £130m would smash the all-time British transfer record by quite a bit.

 

It's certainly a big moment for the Saudi owners, though. To test how serious they are.

 

 

 

Before long average players will be going for that fee. So I'd ask for the most we can get. 

[madras]

2 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

If they were that serious they wouldn’t be letting an asset drift rudderless and spending a shitload strengthening rivals. We’re a pocket change investment and a bottom of the list priority when compared with their Clearlake stake and the whole grand scheme around the 2034 World Cup.

 

Even a 5% stake in Clearlake (£60bn overall investments) is worth 10x their initial £300m in NUFC.

But Chelsea to Clearlake is like NUFC to PIF, a small part of its overall investments It sounds like you are saying they are prioritising Chelsea.