Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, andycap said:

I still think the only deal I would of done with liverpool involving a player plus cash would've been for nunez so 120+.

Just to add some reinforcements in that area,but he's gone now. 

I would need 120m + Ekitike now

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt1892 said:

Downie saying that if we only sign Wissa and Liverpool offer £130m-£135m, there is a small chance that we let Isak go and go with Wissa and Gordon.

 

Would be disappointed after all that flexing last night we did that. Would be bad enough if we accepted £130m and bought someone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matt1892 said:

Downie saying that if we only sign Wissa and Liverpool offer £130m-£135m, there is a small chance that we let Isak go and go with Wissa and Gordon.


Small chance? Feel like it would be absolutely nailed on that we accept. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, greenhill said:

I've been following this cunt's transfer odds for a while. It seems that whenever Liverpool's odds lengthen beyond 4/5, he'll always do something within 24 hours to push for a transfer. Did he learn anything about gambling from Tonali?[emoji38]

Liverpool's odds lengthens to 11/10 again despite the rat's antics. Which card would this clown play next?[emoji38]

 

 

Edited by greenhill

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SEMTEX said:


Small chance? Feel like it would be absolutely nailed on that we accept. 

So we end up with one recognised 29-year-old striker and Liverpool get their wish and they'd have two? I'd be raging at our people after the statement they put out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that was true and we were going Wissa and Gordon, then why would we bother giving them Isak. Just let him rot until January in that case.

 

If we have a plan to reinvest the money and the club see it as being in their best interests to sell, then fair enough, but that doesn't seem like the case. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matt1892 said:

Downie saying that if we only sign Wissa and Liverpool offer £130m-£135m, there is a small chance that we let Isak go and go with Wissa and Gordon.

So we are just going to ditch our plan with two strikers, and basically having the same problem as last season but with several more games? Asking for trouble..

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matt1892 said:

Downie saying that if we only sign Wissa and Liverpool offer £130m-£135m, there is a small chance that we let Isak go and go with Wissa and Gordon.

He has to say that, it’s becoming increasingly clear that we are not getting 2 forwards in, and Sky Sports need transfer news to continue running. This is their biggest news story and they want it running up to and including deadline day to have people sat back watching it on SSN.

 

No one watches deadline day anymore. There is no news camera vans out watching for players coming or leaving, the presenters are just given a club script to read, Stoke fans have been banned from buying dildos to bash around people’s heads, and Harry Redknapp isn’t there to hang out his car window like a bulldog trying to catch the wind.

A couple of push notifications from a few journalists on Twatter will keep you updated instantly, you might get a couple of people viewing SSN for the last hour/half an hour,  it you aren’t getting them sitting there watching it all day like you used too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, nufc123 said:

So we are just going to ditch our plan with two strikers, and basically having the same problem as last season but with several more games? Asking for trouble..

Just Gordon for the month of AFCON.

Scared The Simpsons GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andy said:

If that was true and we were going Wissa and Gordon, then why would we bother giving them Isak. Just let him rot until January in that case.

 

If we have a plan to reinvest the money and the club see it as being in their best interests to sell, then fair enough, but that doesn't seem like the case. 

 

We don't need the money just now, even if we went into hock for another striker, January is just as good, as is next June, from a PSR cycle standpoint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think everyone has bought into the posturing way too much. It’s all make believe anyway, but if we got wissa + 90 odd million for Isak, our squad would have a striker, the dark cloud of bellend isak would be gone, and we’d be 90 million better off. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SEMTEX said:

Think everyone has bought into the posturing way too much. It’s all make believe anyway, but if we got wissa + 90 odd million for Isak, our squad would have a striker, the dark cloud of bellend isak would be gone, and we’d be 90 million better off. 

£90M…………gtf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...