Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[The Prophet]

The breif makes sense. Even if we're not being entirely sincere,  it means we can stick to our asking price and look at other strikers without getting completely ripped off.

 

Whether Isak stays or goes, he still needs replacing this window.

[relámpago blanco]

Who takes our pens now?  Gordon overthinks them too much.

[gbandit]

Just now, relámpago blanco said:

Who takes our pens now?  Gordon overthinks them too much.

Give them to Tonali

[relámpago blanco]

1 minute ago, gbandit said:

Give them to Tonali

Is he good at pens?  Seems he's never taken one professionally in play.

[gbandit]

Just now, relámpago blanco said:

Is he good at pens?  Seems he's never taken one professionally in play.

His striking of the ball and set pieces are extremely good and he’s got a steely character. Be amazed if he’s not quality at pens

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

23 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:

You hate Luke Edwards

 

Edward’s is the singular possession i.e. used for something that belongs to Edward

 

Kudos for the use of unequivocal though 

 

 

 

 

 

Would you put the statue at gallogate entrance or leases ?

 

tough one 

[relámpago blanco]

Just now, gbandit said:

His striking of the ball and set pieces are extremely good and he’s got a steely character. Be amazed if he’s not quality at pens

That is true.  Stick him upfront as well. Fuck it.

[Joelinton7]

We won’t be allowed any penalties if we don’t give Isak to Liverpool 

[Mike]

2 minutes ago, Joelinton7 said:

We won’t be allowed any penalties if we don’t give Isak to Liverpool 

 

 Were we getting pens?

[RUHRLYASLEEVESUP]

13 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Who takes our pens now?  Gordon overthinks them too much.

Schar 

[Stottie]

I don't like Edwards but his wording is probably correct here.

"no chance he will be allowed to leave" = We ain't just letting him go on the cheap on his terms with us looking like passive idiots.

"Liverpool nowhere near matching" = A price likely exists, but Liverpool nowhere near it.

These are not contradictory statements. The message is "pay up or shut up".

 

My guess is that Liverpool come back in big, maybe not big enough, near deadline day. If someone else hasn't done so first. 

 

 

[Wandy]

1 hour ago, Ronson333 said:

 

 

Sorry like but that's definitely a backtracking tweet.  Therefore his headline yesterday was clickbait sensationalism. There are terms that must be be met for a sale to happen, which is very different from the player being told "your not moving, no matter what", which is how he painted the situation yesterday.

 

And based on his claimed "terms of a sale" I'm still not confident Isak stays. If we sign Jackson as the "replacement" that triggers the Isak sale we really are fucking clueless.

 

 

[KingArthur]

20 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

 

Ramos I feel would come. Not sure about the other fella.

I mean it is possible that we asked and he said what the hell is Newcastle. 

[midds]

Yeah, 'you're not going anywhere' is basically saying 'you're not going anywhere unless someone comes up with an astronomically high number that meets our valuation which seems incredibly unlikely, (so to all intents and purposes, you're going nowhere as no fucker can afford you)'

[KingArthur]

3 minutes ago, Wandy said:

 

Sorry like but that's definitely a backtracking tweet.  Therefore his headline yesterday was clickbait sensationalism. There are terms that must be be met for a sale to happen, which is very different from the player being told "your not moving, no matter what", which is how he painted the situation yesterday.

 

And based on his claimed "terms of a sale" I'm still not confident Isak stays. If we sign Jackson as the "replacement" that triggers the Isak sale we really are fucking clueless.

 

 

Every player has a price. Even Wirtz or Salah will be sold if the offer is good enough. So saying ”you will not be sold no matter what” is not true, but Liverpool’s valuation and the current striker market means we are not selling. 

[Joelinton7]

4 minutes ago, Stottie said:

I don't like Edwards but his wording is probably correct here.

"no chance he will be allowed to leave" = We ain't just letting him go on the cheap on his terms with us looking like passive idiots.

"Liverpool nowhere near matching" = A price likely exists, but Liverpool nowhere near it.

These are not contradictory statements. The message is "pay up or shut up".

 

My guess is that Liverpool come back in big, maybe not big enough, near deadline day. If someone else hasn't done so first. 

 

 

If we’ve got nothing lined up then we’re not selling him anywhere near deadline day. 

[PauloGeordio]

1 hour ago, Vaj said:

The only good Luke Edward’s is doing here is pissing off the irritating Liverpool twitter fans in the same way he does us

Getting double the clicks he usually gets if they’re piling in 

[Joelinton7]

9 minutes ago, Mike said:

 

 Were we getting pens?

Isak and Wilson scored a lot. Definitely have been getting more under Eddie than previous years because we actually get in the box.

[Stottie]

4 minutes ago, Mike said:

 

 Were we getting pens?

Gordon alone won 6 in 23/24, the most in a season by any player since VAR was introduced. Only one last time though.

For some folk, pens won don't count as assists. They do on Transfermarkt but not on other sites.

[andycap]

1 hour ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58053653

 

 

That was because he was promised a move. 

[andycap]

Trippier more than likely will take them. 

[relámpago blanco]

12 minutes ago, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said:

Schar 

I was thinking that.

[Wandy]

4 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Every player has a price. Even Wirtz or Salah will be sold if the offer is good enough. So saying ”you will not be sold no matter what” is not true, but Liverpool’s valuation and the current striker market means we are not selling. 

 

As long as they don't get Jackson in I agree it's unlikely. If we get Jackson & Wissa in though I will be very worried.

[PauloGeordio]

43 minutes ago, Ankles Bennett said:

After 2 wembley defeats they are clearly going to submit a £150m bid for Isak which we will reject as we haven't signed any replacements.  I can see the bindippers only just finishing top 5 this season.

Yes because they signed one of them. Oh the irony 

[relámpago blanco]

Just now, andycap said:

Trippier more than likely will take them. 

I think your recollection of the past is not that strong young man.  His set piece taking ability is excellent, the way he strikes a ball etc.  But pens, no.