Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Still not worthy of a thread

gbandit

by gbandit
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

maybe_next_year

maybe_next_year

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Dancing Brave said:

Match of the Day: Who could replace Gary Lineker as host?

 

BBC have their list of who is next [emoji38]  

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8el9d56yy6o

 

 

 

 

My favourite part of the BBC article about him leaving (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdd456rzg75o) 

 

"BBC News understands....His departure is expected to be announced officially by the BBC on Tuesday."

 

I mean you've literally wrote that in an article about him leaving, I think that counts as announcing it :lol:. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Checko

Checko

Posted
Posted

Of that list I'd pick Gabby Logan. Take aside the fact she's a toon fan, she's just generally an excellent presenter whatever sport she's covering.

 

I like Mark chapman too, though his more informal style might be better for MOTD2

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dancing Brave

Dancing Brave

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Checko said:

Of that list I'd pick Gabby Logan. Take aside the fact she's a toon fan, she's just generally an excellent presenter whatever sport she's covering.

 

I like Mark chapman too, though his more informal style might be better for MOTD2

Mark Chapman is the only one on that list who should get the job. 

Imagine if Micah Richards got the job [emoji38]  It would be an hour of him giggling [emoji38]

Shearer getting the job would be class, just for the mackem outrage !

Link to post
Share on other sites
madras

madras

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

The brave but controversial shout would be putting Adrian Chiles back where he belongs. Oh, you want braver? How about Mark Clemmitt, everyone?

 

Chiles where he belongs ? Local radio in the West Midlands?

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites
ponsaelius

ponsaelius

Posted
Posted (edited)

Not sure I've watched a full episode of MOTD in years. I binge all the other highlights straight after on YouTube and then will only watch MOTD if we've won, skipping straight to our game.

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites
madras

madras

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ponsaelius said:

Not sure I've watched a full episode of MOTD in years. I binge all the other highlights straight after on YouTube and then will only watch MOTD if we've won, skipping straight to our game.

 

 

 

How many "that's me" will that post get ?

 

That's me (1).

Link to post
Share on other sites
ponsaelius

ponsaelius

Posted
Posted (edited)

Those little three minute clips on YouTube are perfect for most games, I don't need longer highlights or analysis. If it's a big game chances are I watched it live anyway.

 

Sad in a way but like with many things the consumption model has changed so dramatically. For me MOTD was at its best pre-smartphone when it was reasonably possible you'd actually avoid all results and watch it without knowing the scores. Almost unthinkable/impossible now. I still remember sticking the TV on during highlights of our Carling Cup penalty shoot out win against Watford in 2006, having completely forgotten we had played, and effectively watched it 'as live'. I kind of wish I could be that unplugged these days.

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites
Checko

Checko

Posted
Posted (edited)

Trouble with MOTD is that the analysis is superficial to the point of irrelevance. I'd rather see more highlights than have half the show being people talking vaguely about a game they haven't even properly watched.

 

On the flip side you can get the OTT 442-style anaylsis 'OMG Longstaff was moving a little bit before a throw in was taken, what a genius bit of play' trying to make everything seem far deeper than it actually is.

 

But somewhere between the two there is a sweet spot. MOTD doesn't have time for both thorough highlights and decent analysis, so might as well just spend more time on highlights IMO.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Checko
spelling

Link to post
Share on other sites
toon25

toon25

Posted
Posted
Just now, Checko said:

Trouble with MOTD is that the analysis is superficial to the point of irrelevance. I'd rather see more highlights than have half the show being people talking vaguely about a game they haven't even properly watched.

 

On the flip side you can get the OTT 442-style anaylsis 'OMG Longstaff was moving a little bit before a throw in was taken, what a genius bit of play' trying to make everything seem far deeper than it actually is.

 

But somwhere between the two there is a sweet spot. MOTD doesn't have time for both thorough highlights and decent analysis, so might as well just spend more time on highlights IMO.

 

 

The quality of punditry is so fucking bad these days too that it's just not worth listening to anyway. Give me someone who's been there, done it, and won more than a 'club bants merchant' award and maybe I'd change my mind. But the likes of Richards, Jenas, Murphy and Merson? Not watching.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scotty66

Scotty66

Posted
Posted

I remember when G.Nev first joined Monday night football. His insight was absolute top class. Like nothing we had seen before.

Love it when they get current managers on too, when Rafa was on etc it makes you realise exactly why they're at the elite level.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yorkie

Yorkie

Posted
Posted

You do wonder what the fuck all of the broadcasters are thinking at times. MOTD2 the other night was Troy Deeney and Theo Walcott. The former doesn't deserve to be anywhere near a position like that and the latter is so mild-mannered and uninteresting, you wonder what the point is. There are definitely plenty of decent pundits out there (even if you don't agree with them), but there's some proper bilge. Incredible how Murphy has had that amazing gig for so long.

 

I also dislike the trend of broadcasters appearing on multiple channels now, rather being a BBC guy, or whatever. Matterface is doing TNT this season, for eg. :anguish:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Froggy

Froggy

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, 54 said:

It'll rightfully go to Mark Chapman, who is a very solid understudy and great on 5live (Along with Steve Crossman fwiw), but I'd love it to go to Colin Murray, he's another great presenter. 

 

I also think I speak for everyone when I say, thank fuck its not going to be Jenas. 

 

Colin Murray? Surely not. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tiresias

Tiresias

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Yorkie said:

You do wonder what the fuck all of the broadcasters are thinking at times. MOTD2 the other night was Troy Deeney and Theo Walcott. The former doesn't deserve to be anywhere near a position like that and the latter is so mild-mannered and uninteresting, you wonder what the point is. There are definitely plenty of decent pundits out there (even if you don't agree with them), but there's some proper bilge. Incredible how Murphy has had that amazing gig for so long.

 

I also dislike the trend of broadcasters appearing on multiple channels now, rather being a BBC guy, or whatever. Matterface is doing TNT this season, for eg. :anguish:

 

Good that motd2 lineup was dreadful, stayed up to watch following our win and just ended up annoyed

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yorkie

Yorkie

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Tiresias said:

 

Good that motd2 lineup was dreadful, stayed up to watch following our win and just ended up annoyed

 

I got sucked into Deliverance on BBC2 and there was honestly more charisma there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...