Jump to content

Financial Fair Play / Profit & Sustainability


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

They only got 55m yikes very little value from a powerful card. 

 

Proper kicks can down the road to next summer, because they'll spend and be in same situation next summer.

 

Monchi going to be wheeling and dealing like mad, once again. Clubs should stay away from signing Villa players and let them get fucked (at least to the point they have to sell top players for below value due to being in a weak position). Sure they will end up peddling Bailey and Buendia to Saudi for like £70m between them though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

 

Proper kicks can down the road to next summer, because they'll spend and be in same situation next summer.

 

Monchi going to be wheeling and dealing like mad, once again. Clubs should stay away from signing Villa players and let them get fucked (at least to the point they have to sell top players for below value due to being in a weak position). Sure they will end up peddling Bailey and Buendia to Saudi for like £70m between them though.


Flogging players to Saudi is no issue for them - guaranteed inflated income  

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, gdm said:

 


PSR died as a serious concept with this Hotel/Womans team nonsense. 
 

Im not a hater of PSR in general and think things could be quite grim without it but it feels like we’ve crossed the Rubicon of allowing teams to circumvent it. 
 

Sticking to the rules gets you nowhere, starting to feel we should try and burn the whole thing to the ground. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

Mmmm, more US investment companies. We'll not bemoan all of this in the future at all. 

 

We're gaslighted daily that middle eastern sovereign funds are the issue.

 

Turns out football imitates real life politics. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don’t have any other assets to sell, it’s our men’s team, a decent training ground, a leasehold position on the stadium and i guess the fee interest in the stack site. Our women’s team is far off. So please stop mentioning our owners aren’t using any loopholes to use because we don’t have anything to move.
 

And the one time we sold a player to Saudi, we were run thru the mud in the press and made to defend why Maxi was a 25m player despite his age and helping us qualify for CL. Meanwhile Dhuran has one good half season and goes for double. 
 

finally - I don’t want to use loopholes. I want to do this the right way. 

 

 

Edited by Kanj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just passing on what I read the other day when looking for info on Villa and PSR, but....

Quote

 

Following Chelsea’s big sale, football finance expert Stefan Borson claims that Villa could value their women’s side at more than £100 million.

"If Chelsea's women's team is worth £200m, all of the value in the women's team that justifies £200m is about what the women's game looks like in 2050," he said on talkSPORT. "It's not about what it looks like in 2025.

"It's irrelevant in the formative years of the women's game that Chelsea won trophies because it's all about the future value. So if it's all about the future value of a top football club franchise in the women's game, that applies to almost any Premier League club regardless of their current size.

"Newcastle, Everton and Aston Villa's women's teams are all worth over £100m on the Chelsea valuation metrics because it's not about what they have won so far or the revenue or the profit - it's about what they might be worth in 25 years' time with a football brand the equivalent of Chelsea's."

 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/aston-villa-handed-100m-verdict-31948579

 

It sounds like they've settled on a valuation of closer to 60M, maybe to not ruffle feathers. My quote could still be correct though in that this valuation is based on speculation and not any actual finances of the Aston Villa women's team in 2025. We could of course do this ourselves now two others have done it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Stack anyone?


selling it at a sub 10 cap rate I assume on NOI. It’s an event space on a parking lot that otherwise is tied to the football club in Birmingham. No other investment company is buying that for that value. Absolute funny math.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Stack anyone?

Can just imagine they’re baiting us to try something like this. 

 

Moment we do its curtains and sent packing to the National League. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gdm said:

I’ve never been in the stack but there’s no way it’s worth £50m probably not even worth £2m

It made £1m in December.

 

As it happens I think we’ll sell the stack when we get our new stadium with a built in fanzone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gdm said:

I’ve never been in the stack but there’s no way it’s worth £50m probably not even worth £2m

 

Well, Chelsea were allowed to sell the women's team on future project value, not current value. So we just need a spreadsheet projecting the stack and the land it sits on will be worth £100m in a decade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair play Villa 

 

Replacing missing CL revenue with  loophole £50M

 

Doing their absolute best to try and consolidate themselves in the European spots via off the pitch methods (loopholes and singings/wages) 

 

Annoys me... We've taken a squeaky-clean approach the past couple of years. We held back on spending, sold players, relied on Eddie Howe’s magic to overachieve with minimal investment, and for what? Makes it feel like our frugality and restraint have been pointless when shit like this exists 

 

No issues with Villa doing it, hate the game not the player etc

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to get silly, the logical conclusion is that clubs start owning other businesses and stores to generate revenue. You'll get Chelsea FC Waste Management, Chelsea FC Burger Company, Chelsea FC Agreggates.

 

Let alone stockholding and dividend payouts being added to the bottom line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Selling the women’s team feels like a massively retrograde step, it’s a disgrace that the PL are effectively encouraging this (I don’t blame Villa though) 

 

They're not actually selling it though, they're 'selling' it to themselves.  It's like if you paid yourself twenty quid for moving your TV from one bedroom to another.  Still your TV, in your house, just a different room and you can go tell everyone you just made twenty quid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, gdm said:

I’ve never been in the stack but there’s no way it’s worth £50m probably not even worth £2m

It's worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...